Loss Aversion Robust Optimization Model Under Distribution and Mean Return Ambiguity

被引:3
|
作者
Wang, Jia [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Mengchu [3 ]
Guo, Xiwang [4 ]
Qi, Liang [5 ]
Wang, Xu [6 ]
机构
[1] Northeastern Univ, Sch Business Adm, Shenyang 110819, Peoples R China
[2] Northeastern Univ Qinhuangdao, Sch Econ, Qinhuangdao 066004, Hebei, Peoples R China
[3] New Jersey Inst Technol, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Newark, NJ 07102 USA
[4] Liaoning Shihua Univ, Coll Comp & Commun Engn, Fushun 113001, Peoples R China
[5] Shandong Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Comp Sci & Engn, Qingdao 266590, Peoples R China
[6] Hebei Univ Environm Engn, Coll Econ, Qinhuangdao 066102, Hebei, Peoples R China
关键词
Portfolios; Loss measurement; Uncertainty; Investment; Computational modeling; Analytical models; Symbols; Ambiguity aversion; behavioral finance; human behavior; loss aversion; robust optimization; PORTFOLIO CHOICE; PROSPECT-THEORY; DECISION; ALLOCATION;
D O I
10.1109/TCSS.2022.3195816
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
From the aspect of behavioral finance, which is an emerging area integrating human behavior into finance, this work studies a robust portfolio problem for loss-averse investors under distribution and mean return ambiguity. A loss-aversion distributionally-robust optimization model is constructed if the return distribution of risky assets is unknown. Then, under the premise that the mean returns of risky assets belong to an ellipsoidal uncertainty set, a model under joint ambiguity in distribution and mean returns is constructed. This study solves both robust models and derives their analytical solutions, respectively. Moreover, the effect of ambiguity aversion and loss aversion on robust optimal portfolio returns is studied. The results show that ambiguity-neutral investors who do not know the return distribution obtain more robust optimal portfolio returns than ambiguity-averse investors who are unaware of both the distribution and mean return. The difference between them decreases with the increase of loss aversion coefficients and increases with ambiguity aversion coefficients. Both loss aversion and ambiguity aversion play important roles in investors' behavioral portfolio selection.
引用
收藏
页码:3252 / 3261
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A simple robust asset pricing model under statistical ambiguity
    Garcia-Feijoo, Luis
    Viale, Ariel M.
    [J]. QUANTITATIVE FINANCE, 2022, 22 (05) : 861 - 869
  • [22] Robust optimal reinsurance-investment problem for n competitive and cooperative insurers under ambiguity aversion
    Yang, Peng
    [J]. AIMS MATHEMATICS, 2023, 8 (10): : 25131 - 25163
  • [23] MEAN-CVAR PORTFOLIO SELECTION MODEL WITH AMBIGUITY IN DISTRIBUTION AND ATTITUDE
    Kang, Zhilin
    Li, Xingyi
    Li, Zhongfei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL AND MANAGEMENT OPTIMIZATION, 2020, 16 (06) : 3065 - 3081
  • [24] Optimal excess-of-loss reinsurance contract with ambiguity aversion in the principal-agent model
    Gu, Ailing
    Viens, Frederi G.
    Shen, Yang
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN ACTUARIAL JOURNAL, 2020, 2020 (04) : 342 - 375
  • [25] Distribution-robust loss-averse optimization
    Park, Kyungchul
    Lee, Kyungsik
    [J]. OPTIMIZATION LETTERS, 2017, 11 (01) : 153 - 163
  • [26] Distribution-robust loss-averse optimization
    Kyungchul Park
    Kyungsik Lee
    [J]. Optimization Letters, 2017, 11 : 153 - 163
  • [27] Robust Optimization Using the Mean Model with Bias Correction
    Oliver, Dean S.
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL GEOSCIENCES, 2024,
  • [28] A robust mean absolute deviation model for portfolio optimization
    Moon, Yongma
    Yao, Tao
    [J]. COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2011, 38 (09) : 1251 - 1258
  • [29] EQUILIBRIUM PER-LOSS REINSURANCE STRATEGY WITH DELAY FACTORS AND AMBIGUITY AVERSION UNDER THE COOPERATION FRAMEWORK
    Yuan, Yu
    Li, Qicai
    Sun, Wenxin
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL CONTROL AND RELATED FIELDS, 2024,
  • [30] Computationally Efficient Approximations for Distributionally Robust Optimization Under Moment and Wasserstein Ambiguity
    Cheramin, Meysam
    Cheng, Jianqiang
    Jiang, Ruiwei
    Pan, Kai
    [J]. INFORMS JOURNAL ON COMPUTING, 2022, 34 (03) : 1768 - 1794