The Ancillary Benefits from Climate Policy in the United States

被引:1
|
作者
Britt Groosman
Nicholas Z. Muller
Erin O’Neill-Toy
机构
[1] Environmental Defense Fund,Economics Department
[2] Middlebury College,undefined
来源
关键词
Climate change; Co-benefits; Local air pollution; Human health; Value of a statistical life;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study investigates the benefits to human health that would occur in the United States (US) due to reductions in local air pollutant emissions stemming from a federal policy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. In order to measure the impacts of reduced emissions of local pollutants, this study considers the Warner-Lieberman bill (S.2191) of 2007 and the paper considers the impacts of reduced emissions in the transport and electric power sectors. This analysis provides strong evidence that climate change policy in the US will generate significant returns to society in excess of the benefits due to climate stabilization. The total health-related co-benefits associated with a representative climate policy over the years 2010–2030 range between $103 billion and $1.2 trillion in present value terms. Much of the co-benefit stems from between 32,000 and 189,000 avoided premature mortalities associated with exposure to PM2.5 and O3. Most of the co-benefits are due to reduced emissions of SO2 from coal-fired power plants since these are an important contribution to ambient concentrations of PM2.5. Among the most important determinants of co-benefits is the relationship between climate policy and existing policies governing SO2 discharges from coal-fired power generation capacity. If SO2 emissions are permitted to remain at current levels, total co-benefits are cut by 65%. We find that the co-benefit per ton of CO2 emissions ranges between $1 and $77 depending on modeling assumptions and year.
引用
收藏
页码:585 / 603
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Ancillary Benefits from Climate Policy in the United States
    Groosman, Britt
    Muller, Nicholas Z.
    O'Neill-Toy, Erin
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2011, 50 (04): : 585 - 603
  • [2] Ancillary benefits of climate policy
    Markandya, A
    Rübbelke, DTG
    [J]. JAHRBUCHER FUR NATIONALOKONOMIE UND STATISTIK, 2004, 224 (04): : 488 - 503
  • [3] Policy frameworks for the ancillary benefits of climate change policies
    Pearce, D
    [J]. ANCILLARY BENEFITS AND COSTS OF GREENHOUSE GAS MITIGATION, 2000, : 517 - 560
  • [4] Climate policy and ancillary benefits: A survey and integration into the modelling of international negotiations on climate change
    Pittel, Karen
    Ruebbelke, Dirk T. G.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 68 (1-2) : 210 - 220
  • [5] Ancillary benefits of climate policy in a small open economy: The case of Sweden
    Riekkola, Anna Krook
    Ahlgren, Erik O.
    Soderholm, Patrik
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (09) : 4985 - 4998
  • [6] The cost of climate policy in the United States
    Paltsev, Sergey
    Reilly, John M.
    Jacoby, Henry D.
    Morris, Jennifer F.
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2009, 31 : S235 - S243
  • [7] Climate adaptation law and policy in the United States
    Craig, Robin Kundis
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2022, 9
  • [8] Potential benefits of climate change for potatoes in the United States
    Zhao, Chuang
    Stockle, Claudio O.
    Karimi, Tina
    Nelson, Roger Leroy
    van Evert, Frits K.
    Pronk, Annette A.
    Riddle, Anne A.
    Marshall, Elizabeth
    Raymundo, Rubi
    Li, Yan
    Guan, Kaiyu
    Gustafson, Dave
    Hoogenboom, Gerrit
    Wang, Xi
    Cong, Jiahui
    Asseng, Senthold
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2022, 17 (10):
  • [9] UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS AND FAMILY POLICY IN THE UNITED-STATES
    ROSETTENSTEIN, DS
    [J]. FAMILY LAW QUARTERLY, 1986, 20 (03) : 393 - 411
  • [10] Climate policy without tears: CGE-based ancillary benefits estimates for Chile
    Dessus, S
    O'Connor, D
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2003, 25 (03): : 287 - 317