The Ancillary Benefits from Climate Policy in the United States

被引:1
|
作者
Britt Groosman
Nicholas Z. Muller
Erin O’Neill-Toy
机构
[1] Environmental Defense Fund,Economics Department
[2] Middlebury College,undefined
来源
关键词
Climate change; Co-benefits; Local air pollution; Human health; Value of a statistical life;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study investigates the benefits to human health that would occur in the United States (US) due to reductions in local air pollutant emissions stemming from a federal policy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. In order to measure the impacts of reduced emissions of local pollutants, this study considers the Warner-Lieberman bill (S.2191) of 2007 and the paper considers the impacts of reduced emissions in the transport and electric power sectors. This analysis provides strong evidence that climate change policy in the US will generate significant returns to society in excess of the benefits due to climate stabilization. The total health-related co-benefits associated with a representative climate policy over the years 2010–2030 range between $103 billion and $1.2 trillion in present value terms. Much of the co-benefit stems from between 32,000 and 189,000 avoided premature mortalities associated with exposure to PM2.5 and O3. Most of the co-benefits are due to reduced emissions of SO2 from coal-fired power plants since these are an important contribution to ambient concentrations of PM2.5. Among the most important determinants of co-benefits is the relationship between climate policy and existing policies governing SO2 discharges from coal-fired power generation capacity. If SO2 emissions are permitted to remain at current levels, total co-benefits are cut by 65%. We find that the co-benefit per ton of CO2 emissions ranges between $1 and $77 depending on modeling assumptions and year.
引用
收藏
页码:585 / 603
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The climate and air-quality benefits of wind and solar power in the United States
    Dev Millstein
    Ryan Wiser
    Mark Bolinger
    Galen Barbose
    [J]. Nature Energy, 2
  • [42] Public Good Provision and Ancillary Benefits: The Case of Climate Agreements
    Finus, Michael
    Ruebbelke, Dirk T. G.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2013, 56 (02): : 211 - 226
  • [43] Public Good Provision and Ancillary Benefits: The Case of Climate Agreements
    Michael Finus
    Dirk T. G. Rübbelke
    [J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2013, 56 : 211 - 226
  • [44] Ancillary Benefits of Climate Policies for the Mitigation of Atmospheric Mercury Emissions
    Rafaj, P.
    Cofala, J.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HEAVY METALS IN THE ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 1
  • [45] The ancillary benefits and costs of climate change mitigation: A conceptual framework
    Krupnick, A
    Burtraw, D
    Markandya, A
    [J]. ANCILLARY BENEFITS AND COSTS OF GREENHOUSE GAS MITIGATION, 2000, : 53 - 93
  • [46] GARONA BENEFITS FROM UNITED-STATES EXPERIENCE
    OLASO, J
    SENDINO, F
    [J]. NUCLEAR ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 1986, 31 (388): : 39 - 40
  • [47] Identifying the most important predictors of support for climate policy in the United States
    Goldberg, Matthew H.
    Gustafson, Abel
    Ballew, Matthew T.
    Rosenthal, Seth A.
    Leiserowitz, Anthony
    [J]. BEHAVIOURAL PUBLIC POLICY, 2021, 5 (04) : 480 - 502
  • [48] Climate policy and action 'underneath' Kyoto and Copenhagen: China and the United States
    Koehn, Peter
    [J]. WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-CLIMATE CHANGE, 2010, 1 (03) : 405 - 417
  • [49] THE CLIMATE OF THE UNITED STATES
    不详
    [J]. SOCIAL FORCES, 1926, 4 (04) : 858 - 858
  • [50] Life-cycle energy and climate benefits of energy recovery from wastes and biomass residues in the United States
    Liu, Bo
    Rajagopal, Deepak
    [J]. NATURE ENERGY, 2019, 4 (08) : 700 - 708