Ancillary benefits of climate policy in a small open economy: The case of Sweden

被引:22
|
作者
Riekkola, Anna Krook [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ahlgren, Erik O. [2 ]
Soderholm, Patrik [1 ]
机构
[1] Lulea Univ Technol, Econ Unit, SE-97187 Lulea, Sweden
[2] Chalmers Univ Technol, Environm & Energy Dept, Div Energy Technol, SE-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr, Inst Energy, NL-1755 ZG Petten, Netherlands
关键词
Ancillary benefits; Climate policy; Swedish energy system; AIR-POLLUTION; ELECTRICITY; GENERATION; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2011.06.015
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
It is increasingly recognised that GHG reduction policies can have important ancillary benefits in the form of positive local and regional environmental impacts. The purpose of this paper is to estimate the domestic ancillary pollution benefits of climate policy in Sweden, and investigate how these are affected by different climate policy designs. The latter differ primarily in terms of how the country chooses to meet a specific target and where the necessary emission reductions take place. The analysis relies on simulations within the energy system optimisation model TIMES-Sweden, and focuses on four non-GHG pollutants: Nitrogen Oxides (NOx), Non Methane Volatile Organic Compounds (NMVOC), inhalable particles (PM2.5), and Sulphur dioxide (SO2). The simulations permit detailed assessments of the respective technology and fuel choices that underlie any net changes in the estimated ancillary effects. The results indicate that the ancillary benefits constitute a far from insignificant share of total system costs, and this share appears to be highest in the scenarios that entail the largest emission reductions domestically. This result reflects the fact that carbon dioxide emission reductions abroad also implies a lost opportunity of achieving substantial domestic welfare gain from the reductions of regional and local environmental pollutants. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4985 / 4998
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ancillary benefits of climate policy
    Markandya, A
    Rübbelke, DTG
    [J]. JAHRBUCHER FUR NATIONALOKONOMIE UND STATISTIK, 2004, 224 (04): : 488 - 503
  • [2] The Ancillary Benefits from Climate Policy in the United States
    Groosman, Britt
    Muller, Nicholas Z.
    O'Neill-Toy, Erin
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2011, 50 (04): : 585 - 603
  • [3] The Ancillary Benefits from Climate Policy in the United States
    Britt Groosman
    Nicholas Z. Muller
    Erin O’Neill-Toy
    [J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2011, 50 : 585 - 603
  • [4] Policy frameworks for the ancillary benefits of climate change policies
    Pearce, D
    [J]. ANCILLARY BENEFITS AND COSTS OF GREENHOUSE GAS MITIGATION, 2000, : 517 - 560
  • [5] Monetary policy in a small open economy: The case of Malaysia
    Umezaki, So
    [J]. DEVELOPING ECONOMIES, 2007, 45 (04): : 437 - 464
  • [6] The effects of monetary policy in a small open economy: the case of Portugal
    Sousa, Ricardo M.
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2014, 46 (02) : 240 - 251
  • [7] Optimal monetary policy in a small open economy: The case of Korea
    Chung, Jaesik
    Jung, Yongseung
    Yang, Doo Yong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ASIAN ECONOMICS, 2007, 18 (01) : 125 - 143
  • [8] Climate policy and ancillary benefits: A survey and integration into the modelling of international negotiations on climate change
    Pittel, Karen
    Ruebbelke, Dirk T. G.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 68 (1-2) : 210 - 220
  • [9] Monetary and fiscal policy mix in a small open economy: the case of Croatia
    Coric, Tomislav
    Simovic, Hrvoje
    Deskar-Skrbic, Milan
    [J]. ECONOMIC RESEARCH-EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA, 2015, 28 (01): : 407 - 421