Life cycle assessment of electric kick scooters: consolidating environmental impact quantification and concluding climate-friendly use options

被引:2
|
作者
Baumgartner, Corinna [1 ]
Helmers, Eckard [2 ]
机构
[1] Zurich Univ Appl Sci, Sch Engn, Technopk Str 2,POB, CH-8401 Winterthur, Switzerland
[2] Univ Appl Sci Trier, Dept Environm Planning & Technol, Umwelt Campus,POB 1380, D-55761 Birkenfeld, Germany
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Micro-mobility; Electric kick scooter; Carbon footprint; Environmental impact; Shared fleet application greenhouse gases; Mobility mode; Global warming potential (GWP); CARBON;
D O I
10.1186/s12302-024-00920-x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Background The environmental impact of electric scooters has been the subject of critical debate in the scientific community for the past 5 years. The data published so far are very inhomogeneous and partly methodologically incomplete. Most of the data available in the literature suffer from an average bias of 34%, because end-of-life (EOL) impacts have not been modelled, reported or specified. In addition, the average lifetime mileage of shared fleets of e-scooters, as they are operated in cities around the world, has recently turned out to be much lower than expected. This casts the scooters in an unfavourable light for the necessary mobility transition. Data on impact categories other than the global warming potential (GWP) are scarce. This paper aims to quantify the strengths and weaknesses of e-scooters in terms of their contribution to sustainable transport by more specifically defining and extending the life cycle assessment (LCA) modelling conditions: the modelling is based on two genuine material inventories obtained by dismantling two different e-scooters, one based on a traditional aluminium frame and another, for the first time, based on plastic material.Results This study provides complete inventory data to facilitate further LCA modelling of electric kick scooters. The plastic scooter had a 26% lower lifetime GWP than the aluminium vehicle. A favourable choice of electric motor promises a further reduction in GWP. In addition to GWP, the scooter's life cycles were assessed across seven other impact categories and showed no critical environmental or health impacts compared to a passenger car. On the other hand, only the resource extraction impact revealed clear advantages for electric scooters compared to passenger cars.Conclusions Under certain conditions, scooters can still be an important element of the desired mobility transition. To assure a lifetime long enough is the crucial factor to make the electric scooter a favourable or even competitive vehicle in a future sustainable mobility system. A scooter mileage of more than 5400 km is required to achieve lower CO2eq/pkm emissions compared to passenger cars, which seems unlikely in today's standard use case of shared scooter fleets. In contrast, a widespread use of e-scooters as a commuting tool is modelled to be able to save 4% of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions across the German mobility sector.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [41] Can free-floating electric bike sharing promote more sustainable urban mobility? Evidence from a life cycle environmental impact assessment
    Sun, Shouheng
    Wang, Zhenqin
    Wang, Weicai
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 415
  • [42] Effect of Climate Change and Occupant Behaviour on the Environmental Impact of the Heating and Cooling Systems of a Real Apartment. A Parametric Study through Life Cycle Assessment
    Fajilla, Gianmarco
    Borri, Emiliano
    De Simone, Marilena
    Cabeza, Luisa F.
    Braganca, Luis
    ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (24)
  • [43] Multiuse Polystyrene Plates for Phasing Out Single-Use Plastics: Chemical Performances and Environmental Impact Assessment Through a Life Cycle Approach
    Miele, Ylenia
    Esposito, Gaia
    Ricciardi, Maria
    Faggiano, Antonio
    Pulselli, Federico Maria
    Marchettini, Nadia
    Motta, Oriana
    Proto, Antonio
    ADVANCED ENERGY AND SUSTAINABILITY RESEARCH, 2024, 5 (07):
  • [44] Dissipation-based life cycle impact assessment of mineral resource use-a review, case study, and implications for the product environmental footprint
    Berger, Markus
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2024, 29 (07): : 1177 - 1189
  • [45] Environmental impact of primary beef production chain in Colombia: Carbon footprint, non-renewable energy and land use using Life Cycle Assessment
    Gonzalez-Quintero, Ricardo
    Maria Bolivar-Vergara, Diana
    Chirinda, Ngonidzashe
    Arango, Jacobo
    Pantevez, Heiber
    Barahona-Rosales, Rolando
    Solange Sanchez-Pinzon, Maria
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 773
  • [46] Environmental impact and mineral and energy requirements of the use of an electronic clinical decision support algorithm (CDSA) to manage sick children in Tanzania: A life cycle assessment
    Emery, Nina
    Karlen, Maxime
    Tan, Rainer
    Kavishe, Godfrey
    Agrea, Peter
    Renggli, Sabine
    Kulinkina, Alexandra
    Luwanda, Lameck
    Bengoa, Xavier
    D'Acremont, Valerie
    TROPICAL MEDICINE & INTERNATIONAL HEALTH, 2023, 28 : 27 - 27
  • [47] Environmental impact assessment of agricultural production systems using the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology -: II.: The application to N fertilizer use in winter wheat production systems
    Brentrup, F
    Küsters, J
    Lammel, J
    Barraclough, P
    Kuhlmann, H
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2004, 20 (03) : 265 - 279
  • [48] Climate impact and energy use of structural battery composites in electrical vehicles-a comparative prospective life cycle assessment (vol 28, pg 1366, 2023)
    Hermansson, Frida
    Edgren, Fredrik
    Xu, Johanna
    Asp, Leif E.
    Janssen, Matty
    Svanstrom, Magdalena
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2025, 30 (02): : 397 - 399