Life cycle assessment of electric kick scooters: consolidating environmental impact quantification and concluding climate-friendly use options

被引:2
|
作者
Baumgartner, Corinna [1 ]
Helmers, Eckard [2 ]
机构
[1] Zurich Univ Appl Sci, Sch Engn, Technopk Str 2,POB, CH-8401 Winterthur, Switzerland
[2] Univ Appl Sci Trier, Dept Environm Planning & Technol, Umwelt Campus,POB 1380, D-55761 Birkenfeld, Germany
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Micro-mobility; Electric kick scooter; Carbon footprint; Environmental impact; Shared fleet application greenhouse gases; Mobility mode; Global warming potential (GWP); CARBON;
D O I
10.1186/s12302-024-00920-x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Background The environmental impact of electric scooters has been the subject of critical debate in the scientific community for the past 5 years. The data published so far are very inhomogeneous and partly methodologically incomplete. Most of the data available in the literature suffer from an average bias of 34%, because end-of-life (EOL) impacts have not been modelled, reported or specified. In addition, the average lifetime mileage of shared fleets of e-scooters, as they are operated in cities around the world, has recently turned out to be much lower than expected. This casts the scooters in an unfavourable light for the necessary mobility transition. Data on impact categories other than the global warming potential (GWP) are scarce. This paper aims to quantify the strengths and weaknesses of e-scooters in terms of their contribution to sustainable transport by more specifically defining and extending the life cycle assessment (LCA) modelling conditions: the modelling is based on two genuine material inventories obtained by dismantling two different e-scooters, one based on a traditional aluminium frame and another, for the first time, based on plastic material.Results This study provides complete inventory data to facilitate further LCA modelling of electric kick scooters. The plastic scooter had a 26% lower lifetime GWP than the aluminium vehicle. A favourable choice of electric motor promises a further reduction in GWP. In addition to GWP, the scooter's life cycles were assessed across seven other impact categories and showed no critical environmental or health impacts compared to a passenger car. On the other hand, only the resource extraction impact revealed clear advantages for electric scooters compared to passenger cars.Conclusions Under certain conditions, scooters can still be an important element of the desired mobility transition. To assure a lifetime long enough is the crucial factor to make the electric scooter a favourable or even competitive vehicle in a future sustainable mobility system. A scooter mileage of more than 5400 km is required to achieve lower CO2eq/pkm emissions compared to passenger cars, which seems unlikely in today's standard use case of shared scooter fleets. In contrast, a widespread use of e-scooters as a commuting tool is modelled to be able to save 4% of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions across the German mobility sector.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [31] Use of Environmental Life Cycle Impact Assessment for power generation systems: Canadian electricity Association case study
    Kommonen, Fjalar
    Rhodes, Stanley
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2006 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ELECTRONICS & THE ENVIRONMENT, CONFERENCE RECORD, 2006, : 71 - +
  • [32] Climate impact and energy use of structural battery composites in electrical vehicles-a comparative prospective life cycle assessment
    Hermansson, Frida
    Edgren, Fredrik
    Xu, Johanna
    Asp, Leif E.
    Janssen, Matty
    Svanstrom, Magdalena
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2023, 28 (10): : 1366 - 1381
  • [33] Quantification of the Environmental Impact of Feeding Yeast Probiotic Saccharomyces cerevisiae Actisaf Sc 47 in Dairy Cow: A Life Cycle Assessment Approach
    Salah, Nizar
    Legendre, Heloise
    Paiva, Erika
    Duclos, Julie
    Briche, Maxime
    Maaoui, Mariem
    Scholten, Jasper
    Boute, Celine Garat
    ANIMALS, 2024, 14 (15):
  • [34] Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of conventional vehicles with different fuel options, plug-in hybrid and electric vehicles for a sustainable transportation system in Brazil
    de Souza, Lidiane La Picirelli
    Silva Lora, Elect Eduardo
    Escobar Palacio, Jose Carlos
    Rocha, Mateus Henrique
    Grillo Reno, Maria Luiza
    Venturini, Osvaldo Jose
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 203 : 444 - 468
  • [35] Environmental impact of single-use and reusable items in central venous catheter insertion kits: a life cycle assessment
    Hemberg, Linn
    Wessberg, Nathalie
    Leire, Charlotte
    Bentzer, Peter
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2023, 49 (06) : 662 - 664
  • [36] Environmental impact of single-use and reusable items in central venous catheter insertion kits: a life cycle assessment
    Linn Hemberg
    Nathalie Wessberg
    Charlotte Leire
    Peter Bentzer
    Intensive Care Medicine, 2023, 49 : 662 - 664
  • [37] Quantifying the environmental impact of a Li-rich high-capacity cathode material in electric vehicles via life cycle assessment
    Wang, Yuqi
    Yu, Yajuan
    Huang, Kai
    Chen, Bo
    Deng, Wensheng
    Yao, Ying
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2017, 24 (02) : 1251 - 1260
  • [38] Quantifying the environmental impact of a Li-rich high-capacity cathode material in electric vehicles via life cycle assessment
    Yuqi Wang
    Yajuan Yu
    Kai Huang
    Bo Chen
    Wensheng Deng
    Ying Yao
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2017, 24 : 1251 - 1260
  • [39] The use of life cycle assessment to compare the environmental impact of production and feeding of conventional and genetically modified maize for broiler production in Argentina
    Bennett, RM
    Phipps, RH
    Strange, AM
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL AND FEED SCIENCES, 2006, 15 (01): : 71 - 82
  • [40] The LCA4CSA framework: Using life cycle assessment to strengthen environmental sustainability analysis of climate smart agriculture options at farm and crop system levels
    Acosta-Alba, Ivonne
    Chia, Eduardo
    Andrieu, Nadine
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2019, 171 : 155 - 170