Life cycle assessment of electric kick scooters: consolidating environmental impact quantification and concluding climate-friendly use options

被引:2
|
作者
Baumgartner, Corinna [1 ]
Helmers, Eckard [2 ]
机构
[1] Zurich Univ Appl Sci, Sch Engn, Technopk Str 2,POB, CH-8401 Winterthur, Switzerland
[2] Univ Appl Sci Trier, Dept Environm Planning & Technol, Umwelt Campus,POB 1380, D-55761 Birkenfeld, Germany
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Micro-mobility; Electric kick scooter; Carbon footprint; Environmental impact; Shared fleet application greenhouse gases; Mobility mode; Global warming potential (GWP); CARBON;
D O I
10.1186/s12302-024-00920-x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Background The environmental impact of electric scooters has been the subject of critical debate in the scientific community for the past 5 years. The data published so far are very inhomogeneous and partly methodologically incomplete. Most of the data available in the literature suffer from an average bias of 34%, because end-of-life (EOL) impacts have not been modelled, reported or specified. In addition, the average lifetime mileage of shared fleets of e-scooters, as they are operated in cities around the world, has recently turned out to be much lower than expected. This casts the scooters in an unfavourable light for the necessary mobility transition. Data on impact categories other than the global warming potential (GWP) are scarce. This paper aims to quantify the strengths and weaknesses of e-scooters in terms of their contribution to sustainable transport by more specifically defining and extending the life cycle assessment (LCA) modelling conditions: the modelling is based on two genuine material inventories obtained by dismantling two different e-scooters, one based on a traditional aluminium frame and another, for the first time, based on plastic material.Results This study provides complete inventory data to facilitate further LCA modelling of electric kick scooters. The plastic scooter had a 26% lower lifetime GWP than the aluminium vehicle. A favourable choice of electric motor promises a further reduction in GWP. In addition to GWP, the scooter's life cycles were assessed across seven other impact categories and showed no critical environmental or health impacts compared to a passenger car. On the other hand, only the resource extraction impact revealed clear advantages for electric scooters compared to passenger cars.Conclusions Under certain conditions, scooters can still be an important element of the desired mobility transition. To assure a lifetime long enough is the crucial factor to make the electric scooter a favourable or even competitive vehicle in a future sustainable mobility system. A scooter mileage of more than 5400 km is required to achieve lower CO2eq/pkm emissions compared to passenger cars, which seems unlikely in today's standard use case of shared scooter fleets. In contrast, a widespread use of e-scooters as a commuting tool is modelled to be able to save 4% of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions across the German mobility sector.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] Life cycle assessment of a climate-friendly data center cooling device
    Isler-Kaya, Asli
    Karaosmanoglu, Filiz
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2023, 288
  • [2] Quantification of the environmental impact of lumpfish farming through a life cycle assessment
    Gaeta, Federico Haland
    Parolini, Marco
    Bacenetti, Jacopo
    AQUACULTURE, 2022, 549
  • [3] Use of life cycle assessment to characterize the environmental impacts of polyol production options
    Helling, Richard K.
    Russell, David A.
    GREEN CHEMISTRY, 2009, 11 (03) : 380 - 389
  • [4] Quantification of Cherry Production Impact with the Use of Life Cycle Assessment Methodology
    Spanos, Konstantinos
    Zapounidis, Konstantinos
    Galiagousi, Iliana
    Aidonis, Dimitrios
    SUPPLY CHAINS, PT II, ICSC 2024, 2025, 2111 : 225 - 234
  • [5] Environmental impact assessment of pesticide use within the framework of Life Cycle Assessment
    Heuer, E
    Flake, M
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PFLANZENKRANKHEITEN UND PFLANZENSCHUTZ-JOURNAL OF PLANT DISEASES AND PROTECTION, 2000, : 735 - 744
  • [6] Environmental impact assessment of municipal solid waste management options using life cycle assessment: a case study
    Yadav, Pooja
    Samadder, Sukha Ranjan
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2018, 25 (01) : 838 - 854
  • [7] Environmental impact assessment of municipal solid waste management options using life cycle assessment: a case study
    Pooja Yadav
    Sukha Ranjan Samadder
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2018, 25 : 838 - 854
  • [8] Life Cycle Assessment Perspective for Sectoral Adaptation to Climate Change: Environmental Impact Assessment of Pig Production
    Ndue, Kennedy
    Pal, Goda
    LAND, 2022, 11 (06)
  • [9] Climate and environmental effects of nutritional mitigation options to reduce enteric methane in dairy cattle: A life cycle assessment
    Dorca-Preda, Teodora
    Olijhoek, Dana W.
    Mogensen, Lisbeth
    Lund, Peter
    Kristensen, Troels
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2024, 47 : 528 - 543
  • [10] Impact of the electricity mix and use profile in the life-cycle assessment of electric vehicles
    Faria, Ricardo
    Marques, Pedro
    Moura, Pedro
    Freire, Fausto
    Delgado, Joaquim
    de Almeida, Anibal T.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 24 : 271 - 287