Comparison of machine learning methodologies for predicting kinetics of hydrothermal carbonization of selective biomass

被引:0
|
作者
Mohammadreza Aghaaminiha
Ramin Mehrani
Toufiq Reza
Sumit Sharma
机构
[1] Ohio University,Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Russ College of Engineering and Technology
[2] Ohio University,Department of Mechanical Engineering, Russ College of Engineering and Technology
[3] Florida Institute of Technology,Department of Biomedical and Chemical Engineering and Sciences
来源
关键词
Supervised machine learning; Hydrothermal carbonization; Hydrochar; Biomass; Reaction kinetics;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We have examined performance of various machine learning (ML) methods (artificial neural network, random forest, support vector-machine regression, and K nearest neighbors) in predicting the kinetics of hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) of cellulose, poplar, and wheat straw performed under two different conditions: first, isothermal conditions at 200, 230, and 260 °C, and second, with a linear temperature ramp of 2 °C/min from 160 to 260 °C. The focus of this study was to determine the predictability of the ML methods when the biomass type is not known or there is a mixture of biomass types, which is often the case in commercial operations. In addition, we have examined the performance of ML methods in interpolating kinetics results when experimental data is available for only a handful of time-points, as well as their performance in extrapolating the kinetics when the experimental data from only a few initial time-points is available. While these are stringent tests, the ML models were found to perform reasonably well in most cases with an averaged mean squared error (MSE) and R2 values of 0.25 ± 0.06 and 0.76 ± 0.05, respectively. The ML models showed deviation from experimental data under the conditions when the reaction kinetics were fast. Overall, it is concluded that ML methods are appropriate for the purpose of interpolating and extrapolating the kinetics of the HTC process.
引用
收藏
页码:9855 / 9864
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of machine learning methods for predicting the methane production from anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass
    Wang, Zhengxin
    Peng, Xinggan
    Xia, Ao
    Shah, Akeel A.
    Yan, Huchao
    Huang, Yun
    Zhu, Xianqing
    Zhu, Xun
    Liao, Qiang
    ENERGY, 2023, 263
  • [22] Hydrothermal carbonization of the waste straw: A study of the biomass transient heating behavior and solid products combustion kinetics
    Sobek, S.
    Tran, Q-K
    Junga, R.
    Werle, S.
    FUEL, 2022, 314
  • [23] Machine Learning Methodologies for Predicting Autism Spectrum Disorder across Generations
    Keren, F.
    Keziah, F.
    Kumar, Rubesh T.
    Vanitha, L.
    Venmathi, A. R.
    Gnanaraj, Fredrick F.
    2024 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN COMPUTING, COMMUNICATION AND APPLIED INFORMATICS, ACCAI 2024, 2024,
  • [24] Improved Machine Learning Models for Predicting Selective Compounds
    Ning, Xia
    Walters, Michael
    Karypisxr, George
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2012, 52 (01) : 38 - 50
  • [25] Studies on thermal degradation kinetics and machine learning modeling of hydrochar produced from hydrothermal carbonization of municipal sewage sludge and key lime peel
    Padma, D. Venkata
    Kumar, Kottala Ravi
    Sastry, S. V. A. R.
    Barmavatu, Praveen
    BIOMASS CONVERSION AND BIOREFINERY, 2024,
  • [26] Machine learning methodologies versus cardiovascular risk scores, in predicting disease risk
    Dimopoulos, Alexandros C.
    Nikolaidou, Mara
    Felix Caballero, Francisco
    Engchuan, Worrawat
    Sanchez-Niubo, Albert
    Arndt, Holger
    Luis Ayuso-Mateos, Jose
    Maria Haro, Josep
    Chatterji, Somnath
    Georgousopoulou, Ekavi N.
    Pitsavos, Christos
    Panagiotakos, Demosthenes B.
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2018, 18
  • [27] Application of Machine Learning Methodologies for Predicting Corn Economic Optimal Nitrogen Rate
    Qin, Zhisheng
    Myers, D. Brenton
    Ransom, Curtis J.
    Kitchen, Newell R.
    Liang, Sang-Zi
    Camberato, James J.
    Carter, Paul R.
    Ferguson, Richard B.
    Fernandez, Fabian G.
    Franzen, David W.
    Laboski, Carrie A. M.
    Malone, Brad D.
    Nafziger, Emerson D.
    Sawyer, John E.
    Shanahan, John F.
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2018, 110 (06) : 2596 - 2607
  • [28] Machine learning methodologies versus cardiovascular risk scores, in predicting disease risk
    Alexandros C. Dimopoulos
    Mara Nikolaidou
    Francisco Félix Caballero
    Worrawat Engchuan
    Albert Sanchez-Niubo
    Holger Arndt
    José Luis Ayuso-Mateos
    Josep Maria Haro
    Somnath Chatterji
    Ekavi N. Georgousopoulou
    Christos Pitsavos
    Demosthenes B. Panagiotakos
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18
  • [29] PREDICTING MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT AND DEMENTIA: MACHINE LEARNING VERSUS TRADITIONAL METHODOLOGIES
    Kang, Bada
    Hong, Dahye
    Kim, Jennifer
    Oh, Sarah
    INNOVATION IN AGING, 2024, 8 : 1032 - 1033
  • [30] Numerical Comparison of a Combined Hydrothermal Carbonization and Anaerobic Digestion System with Direct Combustion of Biomass for Power Production
    Heidari, Mohammad
    Salaudeen, Shakirudeen
    Norouzi, Omid
    Acharya, Bishnu
    Dutta, Animesh
    PROCESSES, 2020, 8 (01)