Content Analysis of Gender Roles in Media: Where Are We Now and Where Should We Go?

被引:0
|
作者
Rebecca L. Collins
机构
[1] RAND,
来源
Sex Roles | 2011年 / 64卷
关键词
Media effects; Content analysis; Gender roles; Sex;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper provides a commentary regarding the quantitative content analyses of gender roles in media published in the two special issues of Sex Roles (Rudy et al. 2010a, 2011). A few themes and some overarching lessons emerge from the wide variety of data presented. First, it is clear that women are under-represented across a range of media and settings. Second, when women are portrayed, it is often in a circumscribed and negative manner. Women are often sexualized—typically by showing them in scanty or provocative clothing. Women are also subordinated in various ways, as indicated by their facial expressions, body positions, and other factors. Finally, they are shown in traditionally feminine (i.e., stereotyped) roles. Women are portrayed as nonprofessionals, homemakers, wives or parents, and sexual gatekeepers. Although the studies generally support these conclusions, some interesting moderating factors are identified, such as race. It is suggested that next steps involve the development of theory and a body of empirical evidence regarding the effects of exposure to under-representation of women. Data concerning the effects of exposure to sexualized or stereotypical portrayals on young audiences is also lacking. Finally, content analyses of new media, including those created and distributed by users, are recommended as a next step. It is concluded that, while increasing the representation of women in media may be valuable, it is also critical that the manner in which they are portrayed be simultaneously considered to avoid increasing negative or stereotypical depictions that may be particularly harmful to viewers.
引用
收藏
页码:290 / 298
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Development of Individualized Education Programs: Where Have We Been and Where Should We Go Now?
    Blackwell, William H.
    Rossetti, Zachary S.
    SAGE OPEN, 2014, 4 (02): : 1 - 15
  • [43] Non-invasive diagnostics in wound healing: where are we now and where should we go?
    Romanelli, Marco
    Iannone, Michela
    JOURNAL OF WOUND CARE, 2019, 28 (12) : S3 - S3
  • [44] Twenty years of load theory-Where are we now, and where should we go next?
    Murphy, Gillian
    Groeger, John A.
    Greene, Ciara M.
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2016, 23 (05) : 1316 - 1340
  • [45] Endoscopic stenting - Where are we now and where can we go?
    McLoughlin, Mark Terence
    Byrne, Michael Francis
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 14 (24) : 3798 - 3803
  • [46] Quantum nucleonics: Where we are now and where we may go
    Rivlin, LA
    LASER PHYSICS, 2005, 15 (03) : 454 - 455
  • [47] Ten Years for GHSP: Where Are We Now? Where Will We Go?
    Bhutta, Zulfiqar A.
    Ved, Rajani
    Twum-Danso, Nana
    Saad, Abdulmumin
    Hodgins, Stephen
    GLOBAL HEALTH-SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2023, 11 (02):
  • [48] Where are we now? Where do we go from here?
    Poppe, Krijn J.
    Termeer, Catherine J. A. M.
    Slingerland, Maja
    TRANSITIONS TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE AND FOOD CHAINS IN PERI-URBAN AREAS, 2009, : 359 - 373
  • [49] Artificial photosynthesis: Where are we now? Where can we go?
    House, Ralph L.
    Iha, Neyde Yukie Murakami
    Coppo, Rodolfo L.
    Alibabaei, Leila
    Sherman, Benjamin D.
    Kang, Peng
    Brennaman, M. Kyle
    Hoertz, Paul G.
    Meyer, Thomas J.
    JOURNAL OF PHOTOCHEMISTRY AND PHOTOBIOLOGY C-PHOTOCHEMISTRY REVIEWS, 2015, 25 : 32 - 45
  • [50] COVID-19 - Where should we go now?
    Allen, Claire
    Taylor, Ben Heaven
    Winchester, Chris
    INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE RESEARCH, 2020, 9 (03)