Content Analysis of Gender Roles in Media: Where Are We Now and Where Should We Go?

被引:0
|
作者
Rebecca L. Collins
机构
[1] RAND,
来源
Sex Roles | 2011年 / 64卷
关键词
Media effects; Content analysis; Gender roles; Sex;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper provides a commentary regarding the quantitative content analyses of gender roles in media published in the two special issues of Sex Roles (Rudy et al. 2010a, 2011). A few themes and some overarching lessons emerge from the wide variety of data presented. First, it is clear that women are under-represented across a range of media and settings. Second, when women are portrayed, it is often in a circumscribed and negative manner. Women are often sexualized—typically by showing them in scanty or provocative clothing. Women are also subordinated in various ways, as indicated by their facial expressions, body positions, and other factors. Finally, they are shown in traditionally feminine (i.e., stereotyped) roles. Women are portrayed as nonprofessionals, homemakers, wives or parents, and sexual gatekeepers. Although the studies generally support these conclusions, some interesting moderating factors are identified, such as race. It is suggested that next steps involve the development of theory and a body of empirical evidence regarding the effects of exposure to under-representation of women. Data concerning the effects of exposure to sexualized or stereotypical portrayals on young audiences is also lacking. Finally, content analyses of new media, including those created and distributed by users, are recommended as a next step. It is concluded that, while increasing the representation of women in media may be valuable, it is also critical that the manner in which they are portrayed be simultaneously considered to avoid increasing negative or stereotypical depictions that may be particularly harmful to viewers.
引用
收藏
页码:290 / 298
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Joint ESC/EASD Guidelines on Diabetes, where are we Now and where should we Go?
    Ryden, Lars
    Mellbin, Linda
    CURRENT VASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY, 2012, 10 (06) : 690 - 692
  • [22] Towards improved calibration of crop models - Where are we now and where should we go?
    Seidel, S. J.
    Palosuo, T.
    Thorburn, P.
    Wallach, D.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2018, 94 : 25 - 35
  • [23] The clinical use of implantable cardioverter defibrillators: Where are we now? Where should we go?
    Buxton, AE
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 138 (06) : 512 - 514
  • [24] Nanosafety: Where Are We Now and Where Must We Go?
    Krug, Harald
    Kraegeloh, Annette
    CHEMICAL RESEARCH IN TOXICOLOGY, 2019, 32 (04) : 535 - 535
  • [25] Genes and hypertension: Where we are and where we should go
    Hamet, P
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL HYPERTENSION, 1999, 21 (5-6) : 947 - 960
  • [26] The working alliance: Where are we and where should we go?
    Castonguay, Louis G.
    Constantino, Michael J.
    Holtforth, Martin Grosse
    PSYCHOTHERAPY, 2006, 43 (03) : 271 - 279
  • [27] Where we have been and where we should go
    Stansfield, Charles W.
    LANGUAGE TESTING, 2008, 25 (03) : 311 - 326
  • [28] The microbiome in rheumatology: Where are we and where should we go?
    Manasson, Julia
    Blank, Rebecca B.
    Scher, Jose U.
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2020, 79 (06) : 727 - 733
  • [29] Tests in Europe: Where We Are and Where We Should Go
    Elosua, Paula
    Iliescu, Dragos
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TESTING, 2012, 12 (02) : 157 - 175
  • [30] Parasitic manipulation: where are we and where should we go?
    Biron, DG
    Ponton, F
    Thomas, F
    M S-MEDECINE SCIENCES, 2005, 21 (12): : 1022 - 1023