The comparative utility of fluorescence in situ hybridization and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction in the diagnosis of alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma

被引:0
|
作者
Khin Thway
Jayson Wang
Dorte Wren
Melissa Dainton
David Gonzalez
John Swansbury
Cyril Fisher
机构
[1] The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust,Sarcoma Unit
[2] Royal Marsden Hospital,Department of Histopathology
[3] Royal Marsden Hospital,Molecular Diagnostics
[4] Royal Marsden Hospital,Clinical Cytogenetics
来源
Virchows Archiv | 2015年 / 467卷
关键词
Alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma; Fluorescence in situ hybridization; Molecular diagnostics; Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction; Sarcoma;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for FOXO1 gene rearrangement and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for PAX3/7-FOXO1 fusion transcripts have become routine ancillary tools for the diagnosis of alveolar rhabdomyosarcomas (ARMS). Here we summarize our experience of these adjunct diagnostic modalities at a tertiary center, presenting the largest comparative series of FISH and PCR for suspected or possible ARMS to date. All suspected or possible ARMS tested by FISH or PCR for FOXO1 rearrangement or PAX3/7-FOXO1 fusion transcripts over a 7-year period were included. FISH and PCR results were correlated with clinical and histologic findings. One hundred samples from 95 patients had FISH and/or PCR performed. FISH had higher rates of technical success (96.8 %) compared with PCR (88 %). Where both tests were utilized successfully, there was high concordance rate between them (94.9 %). In 24 histologic ARMS tested for FISH or PCR, 83.3 % were translocation-positive (all for PAX3-FOXO1 by PCR) and included 3 histologic solid variants. In 76 cases where ARMS was excluded, there were 3 potential false-positive cases with FISH but none with PCR. PCR had similar sensitivity (85.7 %) and better specificity (100 %) in aiding the diagnosis of ARMS, compared with FISH (85 and 95.8 %, respectively). All solid variant ARMS harbored FOXO1 gene rearrangements and PAX3-FOXO1 ARMS were detected to the exclusion of PAX7-FOXO1. In comparative analysis, both FISH and PCR are useful in aiding the diagnosis of ARMS and excluding its sarcomatous mimics. FISH is more reliable technically but has less specificity than PCR. In cases where ARMS is in the differential diagnosis, it is optimal to perform both PCR and FISH: both have similar sensitivities for detecting ARMS, but FISH may confirm or exclude cases that are technically unsuccessful with PCR, while PCR can detect specific fusion transcripts that may be useful prognostically.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 224
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Qualitative and quantitative assessment of modified in situ reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (in situ RT-PCR) method
    Watanabe, J
    Sato, Y
    Tsuchiya, B
    Kuramoto, H
    Kameya, T
    ACTA HISTOCHEMICA ET CYTOCHEMICA, 1999, 32 (05) : 423 - 430
  • [42] Rapid diagnosis of acute promyelocytic leukemia with the PML-RARA fusion gene using a combination of droplet-reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and instant-quality fluorescence in situ hybridization
    Shigeto, Shohei
    Matsuda, Kazuyuki
    Yamaguchi, Akemi
    Sueki, Akane
    Uehara, Masayuki
    Sugano, Mitsutoshi
    Uehara, Takeshi
    Honda, Takayuki
    CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2016, 453 : 38 - 41
  • [43] Impact of Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction Diagnosis of Enterovirus Infections on the Care of Febrile Children † 903
    José R Romero
    Steven Hinrichs
    Deborah Perry
    Robert Kruger
    Merrill Magelli
    Pediatric Research, 1998, 43 (Suppl 4) : 156 - 156
  • [44] A prospective clinical study on the use of reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction for the early diagnosis of dengue fever
    Singh, Kamaljit
    Lale, Ajit
    Ooi, Eng Eong
    Chiu, Lily-Lily
    Chow, Vincent T. K.
    Tambyah, Paul
    Koay, Evelyn S. C.
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2006, 8 (05): : 613 - 616
  • [45] CONTROLS FOR VALIDATION OF RELATIVE REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION-POLYMERASE CHAIN-REACTION ASSAYS
    CHEN, D
    KLEBE, RJ
    PCR-METHODS AND APPLICATIONS, 1993, 3 (02): : 127 - 129
  • [46] Detection of canine cytokine gene expression by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction
    Pinelli, E
    van der Kaaij, SY
    Slappendel, R
    Fragio, C
    Ruitenberg, EJ
    Bernadina, W
    Rutten, VPMG
    VETERINARY IMMUNOLOGY AND IMMUNOPATHOLOGY, 1999, 69 (2-4) : 121 - 126
  • [47] Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction on a microarray: the integrating concept of “active arrays”
    Markus von Nickisch-Rosenegk
    Xenia Marschan
    Dennie Andresen
    Frank F. Bier
    Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2008, 391 : 1671 - 1678
  • [48] REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION-POLYMERASE CHAIN-REACTION - AN OVERVIEW OF THE TECHNIQUE AND ITS APPLICATIONS
    OHAN, NW
    HEIKKILA, JJ
    BIOTECHNOLOGY ADVANCES, 1993, 11 (01) : 13 - 29
  • [49] Detection of extraprostatic prostate cells utilizing reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction
    Su, SL
    Boynton, AL
    Holmes, EH
    Elgamal, AAA
    Murphy, GP
    SEMINARS IN SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (01): : 17 - 28
  • [50] A stable and differentiable RNA positive control for reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction
    Ji-Ming Chen
    Li-Xia Guo
    Cheng-Ying Sun
    Ying-Xue Sun
    Ji-Wang Chen
    Lin Li
    Zhi-Liang Wang
    Biotechnology Letters, 2006, 28 : 1787 - 1792