The comparative utility of fluorescence in situ hybridization and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction in the diagnosis of alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma

被引:0
|
作者
Khin Thway
Jayson Wang
Dorte Wren
Melissa Dainton
David Gonzalez
John Swansbury
Cyril Fisher
机构
[1] The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust,Sarcoma Unit
[2] Royal Marsden Hospital,Department of Histopathology
[3] Royal Marsden Hospital,Molecular Diagnostics
[4] Royal Marsden Hospital,Clinical Cytogenetics
来源
Virchows Archiv | 2015年 / 467卷
关键词
Alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma; Fluorescence in situ hybridization; Molecular diagnostics; Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction; Sarcoma;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for FOXO1 gene rearrangement and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for PAX3/7-FOXO1 fusion transcripts have become routine ancillary tools for the diagnosis of alveolar rhabdomyosarcomas (ARMS). Here we summarize our experience of these adjunct diagnostic modalities at a tertiary center, presenting the largest comparative series of FISH and PCR for suspected or possible ARMS to date. All suspected or possible ARMS tested by FISH or PCR for FOXO1 rearrangement or PAX3/7-FOXO1 fusion transcripts over a 7-year period were included. FISH and PCR results were correlated with clinical and histologic findings. One hundred samples from 95 patients had FISH and/or PCR performed. FISH had higher rates of technical success (96.8 %) compared with PCR (88 %). Where both tests were utilized successfully, there was high concordance rate between them (94.9 %). In 24 histologic ARMS tested for FISH or PCR, 83.3 % were translocation-positive (all for PAX3-FOXO1 by PCR) and included 3 histologic solid variants. In 76 cases where ARMS was excluded, there were 3 potential false-positive cases with FISH but none with PCR. PCR had similar sensitivity (85.7 %) and better specificity (100 %) in aiding the diagnosis of ARMS, compared with FISH (85 and 95.8 %, respectively). All solid variant ARMS harbored FOXO1 gene rearrangements and PAX3-FOXO1 ARMS were detected to the exclusion of PAX7-FOXO1. In comparative analysis, both FISH and PCR are useful in aiding the diagnosis of ARMS and excluding its sarcomatous mimics. FISH is more reliable technically but has less specificity than PCR. In cases where ARMS is in the differential diagnosis, it is optimal to perform both PCR and FISH: both have similar sensitivities for detecting ARMS, but FISH may confirm or exclude cases that are technically unsuccessful with PCR, while PCR can detect specific fusion transcripts that may be useful prognostically.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 224
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] In situ hybridization and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction for cyclin D1 mRNA in the diagnosis of mantle cell lymphoma in paraffin-embedded tissues
    Athanasiou, E
    Kotoula, V
    Hytiroglou, P
    Kouidou, S
    Kaloutsi, V
    Papadimitriou, CS
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2001, 14 (02) : 62 - 71
  • [22] Angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma: comparison of fluorescence in situ hybridization and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction as adjunct diagnostic modalities
    Thway, Khin
    Gonzalez, David
    Wren, Dorte
    Dainton, Melissa
    Swansbury, John
    Fisher, Cyril
    ANNALS OF DIAGNOSTIC PATHOLOGY, 2015, 19 (03) : 137 - 142
  • [23] Rapid diagnosis of encephalomyocarditis virus infections in pigs using a reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction
    Vanderhallen, H
    Koenen, F
    JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 1997, 66 (01) : 83 - 89
  • [24] DIAGNOSIS OF FLAME CHLOROSIS BY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION-POLYMERASE CHAIN-REACTION (RT-PCR)
    HABER, S
    RYMERSON, RT
    PROCUNIER, JD
    MURRAY, G
    CVITKOVITCH, SE
    PLANT DISEASE, 1995, 79 (06) : 626 - 630
  • [25] A quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction for detection of Getah virus
    Sing-Sin Sam
    Boon-Teong Teoh
    Cheah-Mun Chee
    Noor-Adila Mohamed-Romai-Noor
    Juraina Abd-Jamil
    Shih-Keng Loong
    Chee-Sieng Khor
    Kim-Kee Tan
    Sazaly AbuBakar
    Scientific Reports, 8
  • [26] Impaired IMPT1 expression in kidney stone disease demonstrated by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction in situ hybridization.
    Sahota, A
    Tzortzaki, EG
    Yang, M
    Glass, D
    Barrera-Oro, J
    Deng, L
    Evan, AP
    Bledsoe, S
    Stambrook, PJ
    Tischfield, JA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2001, 69 (04) : 637 - 637
  • [27] HER-2/neu overexpression and amplification in uterine serous papillary carcinoma:: comparative analysis of immunohistochemistry, real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, and fluorescence in situ hybridization
    Odicino, F. E.
    Bignotti, E.
    Rossi, E.
    Pasinetti, B.
    Tassi, R. A.
    Donzelli, C.
    Falchetti, M.
    Fontana, P.
    Grigolato, P. G.
    Pecorelli, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2008, 18 (01) : 14 - 21
  • [28] Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction assay for rabies virus detection
    Dantas, JV
    Kimura, LMS
    Ferreira, MSR
    Fialho, AM
    Almeida, MMS
    Grégio, CRV
    Romijn, PC
    Leite, JPG
    ARQUIVO BRASILEIRO DE MEDICINA VETERINARIA E ZOOTECNIA, 2004, 56 (03) : 398 - 400
  • [29] Detection of Salmonella enteritidis by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
    Szabo, EA
    Mackey, BM
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 1999, 51 (2-3) : 113 - 122
  • [30] A reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction bioassay for avian vitellogenin mRNA
    Lorenzen, A
    Casley, WL
    Moon, TW
    TOXICOLOGY AND APPLIED PHARMACOLOGY, 2001, 176 (03) : 169 - 180