Nipple-sparing mastectomy: risk of nipple-areolar recurrences in a series of 579 cases

被引:0
|
作者
J. Y. Petit
U. Veronesi
P. Rey
N. Rotmensz
E. Botteri
M. Rietjens
C. Garusi
F. De Lorenzi
S. Martella
R. Bosco
A. Manconi
A. Luini
V. Galimberti
P. Veronesi
G. B. Ivaldi
R. Orecchia
机构
[1] European Institute of Oncology,Department of Plastic Surgery
[2] European Institute of Oncology,Scientific Direction
[3] European Institute of Oncology,Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics
[4] European Institute of Oncology,Department of Breast Surgery
[5] European Institute of Oncology,Department of Radiotherapy
来源
关键词
Nipple-sparing; Mastectomy; Breast; Conservative treatment;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background When the conservative treatment is not recommended, Nipple Sparing Mastectomy (NSM) is proposed more and more frequently for the surgical treatment of breast cancer. The risk of local recurrence behind the nipple areolar complex (NAC) is the main limiting factor of the NSM procedure. To minimize such risk, we proposed in 2002 a intraoperative radiotherapy of the preserved NAC. Patients and methods From March 2002 to November 2006, 579 cases (in 570 patients) of NSM were performed for carcinoma. The median follow up time was 19 months (Range: 1–60). The subcutaneous mastectomy was performed through an incision removing a portion of the skin overlying the tumour. An extemporaneous histological examination was performed on the retroareolar glandular tissue. If the histology was positive the patient was not considered eligible. Then an intraoperative radiotherapy with electrons (ELIOT) of 16 Gy in one shot was delivered on the NAC area. An immediate breast reconstruction was done using implants in most cases and in several cases a musculocutaneous flaps, usually in large breast. The number of local recurrences was recorded and the correlation between their occurrence and the clinical and histological criteria were analysed using the Gray test statistical method in a competing framework. Results In 516 cases the negative retroareolar frozen section biopsy was confirmed by the final histology, while in 63 cases, the final histology showed foci of carcinoma. Seven out of these 63 cases underwent a secondary NAC removal. In the 56 cases which preserved areolas we did not observe any local recurrence after 19 months follow up. The probability of retro areola positive histology increases with the tumour size. and was not related to the nodal status. The rate of local relapses was 0.9% per year. We didn’t find any significant difference in the local relapse rate according to different patient’s and tumour’s features. Most relapses were located close to the tumour bed but never in the NAC area. Conclusion Our study confirms that the local recurrence rate in the NSM completed with local radiotherapy on the NAC is not higher than the usual rate observed in the literature and the preservation of the NAC does not increase the risk. The absence of local recurrence in the region where a portion of glandular tissue has been purposely preserved is a good argument in favour of ELIOT.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 101
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Nipple Loss following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
    Jabir, Shehab
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 139 (03) : 794E - 794E
  • [32] Surgical Delay of the Nipple–Areolar Complex: A Powerful Technique to Maximize Nipple Viability Following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
    J. Arthur Jensen
    Jennifer H. Lin
    Nimmi Kapoor
    Armando E. Giuliano
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2012, 19 : 3171 - 3176
  • [33] Nipple-areolar complex malposition in breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy: a multi-institutional retrospective observational study in Japan
    Kato, Sayuri
    Mori, Hiroki
    Saiga, Miho
    Watanabe, Satoko
    Sasada, Shinsuke
    Sasaki, Ayano
    Ogiya, Akiko
    Yamamoto, Mao
    Narui, Kazutaka
    Takano, Junji
    Seki, Hirohito
    Nagura, Naomi
    Ishitobi, Makoto
    Shien, Tadahiko
    BREAST CANCER, 2024, 31 (04) : 649 - 658
  • [34] Nipple viability after nipple-sparing mastectomy in patients with prior circum-areolar incisions
    Rose, Jessica F.
    Zavlin, Dmitry
    Lim, Sherry J.
    Spiegel, Aldona J.
    Chevray, Pierre M.
    Albright, Steven B.
    Friedman, Jeffrey D.
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2018, 24 (06): : 1028 - 1034
  • [35] Nipple-sparing mastectomy-is it worth the risk?
    Petit, Jean-Yves
    Veronesi, Umberto
    Lohsiriwat, Visnu
    Rey, PierCarlo
    Curigliano, Giuseppe
    Martella, Stefano
    Garusi, Cristina
    De Lorenzi, Francesca
    Manconi, Andrea
    Botteri, Edoardo
    Didier, Florence
    Orecchia, Roberto
    Rietjens, Mario
    NATURE REVIEWS CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 8 (12) : 742 - 747
  • [36] Ptosis and Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
    Mitchell, Sunny D.
    Beitsch, Peter
    Feldman, Sheldon
    Wiley, Shawna
    Manasseh, Donna Marie
    Unzeitig, Gary
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 21 : 83 - 84
  • [37] Nipple-sparing Mastectomy for Breast Cancer at a Japanese Institution - Risk of Nipple-areola Recurrence in a Series of 806 Cases
    Sakurai, T.
    Sakurai, T.
    Jinta, E.
    Suzuma, T.
    Umemura, T.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 48 : S189 - S189
  • [38] Contemporary mastectomy options for male breast cancer: nipple-sparing and areolar-sparing mastectomy-a case series
    Anderson, Taylor N.
    Bao, Jean
    Ayala, Carlos
    Wapnir, Irene
    Karin, Mardi R.
    ANNALS OF BREAST SURGERY, 2024, 8
  • [39] Nipple-Areolar Complex-Sparing Mastectomy: Feasibility, Patient Selection, and Technique
    Gildy Babiera
    Rache Simmons
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2010, 17 : 245 - 248
  • [40] Positive Nipple Margin After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: An Alternative and Oncologically Safe Approach to Preserving the Nipple–Areolar Complex
    Michelle L. Haslinger
    Michael Sosin
    Alex J. Bartholomew
    Andrew Crocker
    Aiste Gulla
    Shawna C. Willey
    Troy A. Pittman
    Eleni A. Tousimis
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2018, 25 : 2303 - 2307