Nipple-sparing mastectomy: risk of nipple-areolar recurrences in a series of 579 cases

被引:0
|
作者
J. Y. Petit
U. Veronesi
P. Rey
N. Rotmensz
E. Botteri
M. Rietjens
C. Garusi
F. De Lorenzi
S. Martella
R. Bosco
A. Manconi
A. Luini
V. Galimberti
P. Veronesi
G. B. Ivaldi
R. Orecchia
机构
[1] European Institute of Oncology,Department of Plastic Surgery
[2] European Institute of Oncology,Scientific Direction
[3] European Institute of Oncology,Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics
[4] European Institute of Oncology,Department of Breast Surgery
[5] European Institute of Oncology,Department of Radiotherapy
来源
关键词
Nipple-sparing; Mastectomy; Breast; Conservative treatment;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background When the conservative treatment is not recommended, Nipple Sparing Mastectomy (NSM) is proposed more and more frequently for the surgical treatment of breast cancer. The risk of local recurrence behind the nipple areolar complex (NAC) is the main limiting factor of the NSM procedure. To minimize such risk, we proposed in 2002 a intraoperative radiotherapy of the preserved NAC. Patients and methods From March 2002 to November 2006, 579 cases (in 570 patients) of NSM were performed for carcinoma. The median follow up time was 19 months (Range: 1–60). The subcutaneous mastectomy was performed through an incision removing a portion of the skin overlying the tumour. An extemporaneous histological examination was performed on the retroareolar glandular tissue. If the histology was positive the patient was not considered eligible. Then an intraoperative radiotherapy with electrons (ELIOT) of 16 Gy in one shot was delivered on the NAC area. An immediate breast reconstruction was done using implants in most cases and in several cases a musculocutaneous flaps, usually in large breast. The number of local recurrences was recorded and the correlation between their occurrence and the clinical and histological criteria were analysed using the Gray test statistical method in a competing framework. Results In 516 cases the negative retroareolar frozen section biopsy was confirmed by the final histology, while in 63 cases, the final histology showed foci of carcinoma. Seven out of these 63 cases underwent a secondary NAC removal. In the 56 cases which preserved areolas we did not observe any local recurrence after 19 months follow up. The probability of retro areola positive histology increases with the tumour size. and was not related to the nodal status. The rate of local relapses was 0.9% per year. We didn’t find any significant difference in the local relapse rate according to different patient’s and tumour’s features. Most relapses were located close to the tumour bed but never in the NAC area. Conclusion Our study confirms that the local recurrence rate in the NSM completed with local radiotherapy on the NAC is not higher than the usual rate observed in the literature and the preservation of the NAC does not increase the risk. The absence of local recurrence in the region where a portion of glandular tissue has been purposely preserved is a good argument in favour of ELIOT.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 101
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
    Jensen, Jay Arthur
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2018, 226 (01) : 108 - 108
  • [22] Nipple-sparing mastectomy
    Rusby, J. E.
    Smith, B. L.
    Gui, G. P. H.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 97 (03) : 305 - 316
  • [23] Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
    Spear, Scott L.
    Hannan, Catherine M.
    Willey, Shawna C.
    Cocilovo, Costanza
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2009, 123 (06) : 1665 - 1673
  • [24] Nipple-sparing mastectomy—is it worth the risk?
    Jean-Yves Petit
    Umberto Veronesi
    Visnu Lohsiriwat
    PierCarlo Rey
    Giuseppe Curigliano
    Stefano Martella
    Cristina Garusi
    Francesca De Lorenzi
    Andrea Manconi
    Edoardo Botteri
    Florence Didier
    Roberto Orecchia
    Mario Rietjens
    Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, 2011, 8 : 742 - 747
  • [25] Immediate breast reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy in an Asian population: Aesthetic outcomes and mitigating nipple-areolar complex necrosis
    Pek, Wan-Sze
    Tan, Bien-Keem
    Ng, Yvonne Ying Ru
    Tan, Veronique Kiak Mien
    Rasheed, Mohamed Zulfikar
    Tan, Benita Kiat Tee
    Ong, Kong Wee
    Ong, Yee Siang
    ARCHIVES OF PLASTIC SURGERY-APS, 2018, 45 (03): : 229 - 238
  • [26] Risk Factors for Skin Flap and Nipple-Areolar Necrosis in Patients Undergoing Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy With Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Reconstruction
    Ray, Hannah R.
    Doren, Erin L.
    Adamson, Karri
    Kong, Amanda L.
    Cortina, Chandler S.
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2024,
  • [27] Overall Survival, Disease-Free Survival, and Nipple-Areolar Recurrence in the Setting of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: A Meta-Analysis
    De La Cruz, Lucy M.
    Blankenship, Stephanie A.
    Tappy, Erryn E.
    Moody, Alison M.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 22 : 6 - 7
  • [28] Nipple-Areolar Complex Ischemia After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy With Immediate Implant-Based Reconstruction: Risk Factors and the Success of Conservative Treatment
    Dent, Briar L.
    Small, Kevin
    Swistel, Alexander
    Talmor, Mia
    AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 2014, 34 (04) : 560 - 570
  • [29] Nipple Loss following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
    Mastroianni, Melissa
    Lin, Alex M.
    Smith, Barbara L.
    Austen, William G., Jr.
    Colwell, Amy S.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 138 (01) : 24E - 30E
  • [30] Pathologic Evaluation of Nipple-Areolar Complex Sparing Mastectomy Specimens.
    Burch-Smith, R.
    Babiera, G.
    Fearmonti, R.
    Wagner, J.
    Krishnamurthy, S.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2011, 24 : 30A - 30A