Nipple-sparing mastectomy: risk of nipple-areolar recurrences in a series of 579 cases

被引:0
|
作者
J. Y. Petit
U. Veronesi
P. Rey
N. Rotmensz
E. Botteri
M. Rietjens
C. Garusi
F. De Lorenzi
S. Martella
R. Bosco
A. Manconi
A. Luini
V. Galimberti
P. Veronesi
G. B. Ivaldi
R. Orecchia
机构
[1] European Institute of Oncology,Department of Plastic Surgery
[2] European Institute of Oncology,Scientific Direction
[3] European Institute of Oncology,Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics
[4] European Institute of Oncology,Department of Breast Surgery
[5] European Institute of Oncology,Department of Radiotherapy
来源
关键词
Nipple-sparing; Mastectomy; Breast; Conservative treatment;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background When the conservative treatment is not recommended, Nipple Sparing Mastectomy (NSM) is proposed more and more frequently for the surgical treatment of breast cancer. The risk of local recurrence behind the nipple areolar complex (NAC) is the main limiting factor of the NSM procedure. To minimize such risk, we proposed in 2002 a intraoperative radiotherapy of the preserved NAC. Patients and methods From March 2002 to November 2006, 579 cases (in 570 patients) of NSM were performed for carcinoma. The median follow up time was 19 months (Range: 1–60). The subcutaneous mastectomy was performed through an incision removing a portion of the skin overlying the tumour. An extemporaneous histological examination was performed on the retroareolar glandular tissue. If the histology was positive the patient was not considered eligible. Then an intraoperative radiotherapy with electrons (ELIOT) of 16 Gy in one shot was delivered on the NAC area. An immediate breast reconstruction was done using implants in most cases and in several cases a musculocutaneous flaps, usually in large breast. The number of local recurrences was recorded and the correlation between their occurrence and the clinical and histological criteria were analysed using the Gray test statistical method in a competing framework. Results In 516 cases the negative retroareolar frozen section biopsy was confirmed by the final histology, while in 63 cases, the final histology showed foci of carcinoma. Seven out of these 63 cases underwent a secondary NAC removal. In the 56 cases which preserved areolas we did not observe any local recurrence after 19 months follow up. The probability of retro areola positive histology increases with the tumour size. and was not related to the nodal status. The rate of local relapses was 0.9% per year. We didn’t find any significant difference in the local relapse rate according to different patient’s and tumour’s features. Most relapses were located close to the tumour bed but never in the NAC area. Conclusion Our study confirms that the local recurrence rate in the NSM completed with local radiotherapy on the NAC is not higher than the usual rate observed in the literature and the preservation of the NAC does not increase the risk. The absence of local recurrence in the region where a portion of glandular tissue has been purposely preserved is a good argument in favour of ELIOT.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 101
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Nipple-sparing mastectomy: risk of nipple-areolar recurrences in a series of 579 cases
    Petit, J. Y.
    Veronesi, U.
    Rey, P.
    Rotmensz, N.
    Botteri, E.
    Rietjens, M.
    Garusi, C.
    De Lorenzi, F.
    Martella, S.
    Bosco, R.
    Manconi, A.
    Luini, A.
    Galimberti, V.
    Veronesi, P.
    Ivaldi, G. B.
    Orecchia, R.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2009, 114 (01) : 97 - 101
  • [2] Nipple-areolar complex ischemia and necrosis in nipple-sparing mastectomy
    Ahn, Sung Jae
    Woo, Tae Yong
    Lee, Dong Won
    Lew, Dae Hyun
    Song, Seung Yong
    EJSO, 2018, 44 (08): : 1170 - 1176
  • [3] Nipple sparing mastectomy: Nipple-areolar recurrence
    Seo, J.
    Ko, B.
    Park, E.
    Lee, W.
    Kim, H.
    Son, B.
    Ahn, S.
    BREAST, 2009, 18 : S43 - S43
  • [4] Patient satisfaction following nipple-sparing mastectomy and assessment of nipple-areolar sensation
    Shaffer, Kristina
    Danko, Melissa
    DeLaere, Angela
    Chant, Ericka
    Pople, Blerina
    Grisby, Shaunda
    Dekhne, Nayana
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2019, 25 (03): : 542 - 544
  • [5] Quantitative assessment and risk factors for nipple-areolar complex malposition after nipple-sparing mastectomy
    Makiguchi, Takaya
    Nakamura, Hideharu
    Fujii, Takaaki
    Yokoo, Satoshi
    BREAST CANCER, 2019, 26 (01) : 58 - 64
  • [6] Patient satisfaction following nipple-sparing mastectomy and assessment of nipple-areolar sensation
    Shaffer, Kristina
    Danko, Melissa
    DeLaere, Angela
    Chant, Ericka
    Pople, Blerina
    Grisby, Shaunda
    Dekhne, Nayana
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 24 : 233 - 234
  • [7] Surgical Delay of the Nipple-Areolar Complex in High-risk Nipple-sparing Mastectomy Reconstruction
    Martinovic, Maryann E.
    Pellicane, James V.
    Blanchet, Nadia P.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2016, 4 (06)
  • [8] The Role of Sharp Dissection in Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: A Safe Procedure with No Necrosis of the Nipple-Areolar Complex
    Yang, Ci-Qiu
    Ji, Fei
    Gao, Hong-Fei
    Zhang, Liu-Lu
    Yang, Mei
    Zhu, Teng
    Chen, Min-yi
    Li, Jie-qing
    Wang, Kun
    CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2019, 11 : 10223 - 10228
  • [9] Surgical Delay of the Nipple-Areolar Complex: A Powerful Technique to Maximize Nipple Viability Following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
    Jensen, J. Arthur
    Lin, Jennifer H.
    Kapoor, Nimmi
    Giuliano, Armando E.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 19 (10) : 3171 - 3176
  • [10] Minimizing Nipple-Areolar Complex Complications in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
    Perez-Otero, Sofia
    Hemal, Kshipra
    Boyd, Carter J.
    Kabir, Raeesa
    Sorenson, Thomas J.
    Jacobson, Alexis
    Thanik, Vishal D.
    Levine, Jamie P.
    Cohen, Oriana D.
    Karp, Nolan S.
    Choi, Mihye
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2024, 92 (4S) : S179 - S184