In-vitro biofilm removal from TiUnite® implant surface with an air polishing and two different plasma devices

被引:0
|
作者
Haude, Sandra [1 ]
Matthes, Rutger [1 ]
Pitchika, Vinay [1 ]
Holtfreter, Birte [1 ]
Schlueter, Rabea [2 ]
Gerling, Torsten [3 ]
Kocher, Thomas [1 ]
Jablonowski, Lukasz [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Greifswald, Dent Sch, Unit Periodontol, Dept Restorat Dent Periodontol Endodontol Prevent, Walther Rathenau Str 42a, D-17475 Greifswald, Germany
[2] Univ Greifswald, Dept Biol, Imaging Ctr, Greifswald, Germany
[3] ZIK Plasmatis Leibniz Inst Plasma Sci & Technol eV, Leibniz Res Alliance Leibniz Hlth Technol, Greifswald, Germany
来源
BMC ORAL HEALTH | 2024年 / 24卷 / 01期
关键词
Air polishing; Biofilm; Cold plasma; Anodised titanium; Peri-implantitis; Surface treatment; EXPERIMENTAL PERI-IMPLANTITIS; COLD ATMOSPHERIC PLASMA; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; OSTEOBLAST GROWTH; TITANIUM DISCS; DECONTAMINATION; DEBRIDEMENT; PROGRESSION; THERAPY; POWDER;
D O I
10.1186/s12903-024-04230-9
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background We investigated the efficacy of two different cold atmospheric pressure jet plasma devices (CAP09 and CAPmed) and an air polishing device with glycine powder (AP) either applied as monotherapies or combined therapies (AP + CAP09; AP + CAPmed), in microbial biofilm removal from discs with anodised titanium surface.Methods Discs covered with 7-day-old microbial biofilm were treated either with CAP09, CAPmed, AP, AP + CAP09 or AP + CAPmed and compared with negative and positive controls. Biofilm removal was assessed with flourescence and electron microscopy immediately after treatment and after 5 days of reincubation of the treated discs.Results Treatment with CAP09 or CAPmed did not lead to an effective biofilm removal, whereas treatment with AP detached the complete biofilm, which however regrew to baseline magnitude after 5 days of reincubation. Both combination therapies (AP + CAP09 and AP + CAPmed) achieved a complete biofilm removal immediately after cleaning. However, biofilm regrew after 5 days on 50% of the discs treated with the combination therapy.Conclusion AP treatment alone can remove gross biofilm immediately from anodised titanium surfaces. However, it did not impede regrowth after 5 days, because microorganisms were probably hidden in holes and troughs, from which they could regrow, and which were inaccessible to AP. The combination of AP and plasma treatment probably removed or inactivated microorganisms also from these hard to access spots. These results were independent of the choice of plasma device.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Efficacy of two diode lasers in the removal of calculus from the root surface: An in vitro study
    Marcattili, Domenico
    Mancini, Leonardo
    Tarallo, Francesco
    Casalena, Fabio
    Pietropaoli, Carla
    Marchetti, Enrico
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DENTAL RESEARCH, 2023, 9 (05): : 757 - 763
  • [42] In-vitro study of surface changes in fixed orthodontic appliances following air polishing with clinpro™ prophy and air-flow® [In-vitro-Untersuchung der Oberflächenveränderungen von festsitzenden kieferorthopädischen Apparaturen durch Air-Polishing mit Clinpro™ Prophy und Air-Flow®]
    Wilmes B.
    Vali S.
    Drescher D.
    Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie, 2009, 70 (5): : 371 - 384
  • [43] The In-Vitro Activity of a Cold Atmospheric Plasma Device Utilizing Ambient Air against Bacteria and Biofilms Associated with Periodontal or Peri-Implant Diseases
    Jungbauer, Gert
    Favaro, Leandro
    Mueller, Steffen
    Sculean, Anton
    Eick, Sigrun
    ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL, 2022, 11 (06):
  • [44] Characterization of the environmental quality of sediments from two estuarine systems based on different in-vitro bioassays
    Fernandes, Denise
    Pujol, Silvia
    Perez-Albaladejo, Elisabet
    Tauler, Roma
    Bebianno, Maria Joao
    Porte, Cinta
    MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2014, 96 : 127 - 135
  • [45] EFFECT ON APHERESIS PLATELET CONCENTRATES AFTER MAXIMAL PLASMA REMOVAL AND REPLACING WITH PAS 5: A COMPARISON FROM TWO DIFFERENT APHERESIS COLLECTION DEVICES
    Morrison, A.
    McMillan, L.
    Min, K.
    Petrik, J.
    VOX SANGUINIS, 2013, 105 : 132 - 132
  • [46] In Vitro Efficacy of XP-endo Finisher with 2 Different Protocols on Biofilm Removal from Apical Root Canals
    Bao, Pingping
    Shen, Ya
    Lin, James
    Haapasalo, Markus
    JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2017, 43 (02) : 321 - 325
  • [47] In-vitro effects of novel periodontal scalers with a planar ultrasonic piezoelectric transducer on periodontal biofilm removal, dentine surface roughness, and periodontal ligament fibroblasts adhesion
    Berto, Luciana Aranha
    Ettmayer, Johanna Blanda
    Stutzer, Diego
    Nietzsche, Sandor
    Niederhauser, Thomas
    Burger, Juergen
    Sculean, Anton
    Eick, Sigrun
    Hofmann, Martin
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2024, 28 (05)
  • [48] Effect of artificial landmarks of the prefabricated auxiliary devices located at different arch positions on the accuracy of complete-arch edentulous digital implant scanning: An in-vitro study
    Wu, Hio Kuan
    Chen, Guanhui
    Zhang, Zhengchuan
    Lin, Xiaoxuan
    Huang, Xiaoqiong
    Deng, Feilong
    Li, Yiming
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2024, 140
  • [49] Comparison of two different evaluation methods for biofilm formation of S. epidermidis isolated from ocular surface
    Budak, Berna Akova
    Kivanc, Sertac Argun
    Yildiz, Meral
    Kivanc, Merih
    Gullulu, Gulay
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2015, 56 (07)
  • [50] Effect of Various Irrigating Devices on the Removal of Two Different Forms of Calcium Hydroxide from Internal Resorption Cavities
    Nasab Mobarakeh, Nima Mousavi
    Taheri, Afsaneh
    Rahmanian, Hadi
    Jafarpour, Dana
    Rahmanian, Sareh
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2020, 2020