In-vitro biofilm removal from TiUnite® implant surface with an air polishing and two different plasma devices

被引:0
|
作者
Haude, Sandra [1 ]
Matthes, Rutger [1 ]
Pitchika, Vinay [1 ]
Holtfreter, Birte [1 ]
Schlueter, Rabea [2 ]
Gerling, Torsten [3 ]
Kocher, Thomas [1 ]
Jablonowski, Lukasz [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Greifswald, Dent Sch, Unit Periodontol, Dept Restorat Dent Periodontol Endodontol Prevent, Walther Rathenau Str 42a, D-17475 Greifswald, Germany
[2] Univ Greifswald, Dept Biol, Imaging Ctr, Greifswald, Germany
[3] ZIK Plasmatis Leibniz Inst Plasma Sci & Technol eV, Leibniz Res Alliance Leibniz Hlth Technol, Greifswald, Germany
来源
BMC ORAL HEALTH | 2024年 / 24卷 / 01期
关键词
Air polishing; Biofilm; Cold plasma; Anodised titanium; Peri-implantitis; Surface treatment; EXPERIMENTAL PERI-IMPLANTITIS; COLD ATMOSPHERIC PLASMA; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; OSTEOBLAST GROWTH; TITANIUM DISCS; DECONTAMINATION; DEBRIDEMENT; PROGRESSION; THERAPY; POWDER;
D O I
10.1186/s12903-024-04230-9
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background We investigated the efficacy of two different cold atmospheric pressure jet plasma devices (CAP09 and CAPmed) and an air polishing device with glycine powder (AP) either applied as monotherapies or combined therapies (AP + CAP09; AP + CAPmed), in microbial biofilm removal from discs with anodised titanium surface.Methods Discs covered with 7-day-old microbial biofilm were treated either with CAP09, CAPmed, AP, AP + CAP09 or AP + CAPmed and compared with negative and positive controls. Biofilm removal was assessed with flourescence and electron microscopy immediately after treatment and after 5 days of reincubation of the treated discs.Results Treatment with CAP09 or CAPmed did not lead to an effective biofilm removal, whereas treatment with AP detached the complete biofilm, which however regrew to baseline magnitude after 5 days of reincubation. Both combination therapies (AP + CAP09 and AP + CAPmed) achieved a complete biofilm removal immediately after cleaning. However, biofilm regrew after 5 days on 50% of the discs treated with the combination therapy.Conclusion AP treatment alone can remove gross biofilm immediately from anodised titanium surfaces. However, it did not impede regrowth after 5 days, because microorganisms were probably hidden in holes and troughs, from which they could regrow, and which were inaccessible to AP. The combination of AP and plasma treatment probably removed or inactivated microorganisms also from these hard to access spots. These results were independent of the choice of plasma device.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] In-vitro comparison of two different toothbrush bristles about peri-implant sulcus penetration
    Montevecchi, Marco
    Valeriani, Leoluca
    Bellanova, Leonardo
    Stefanini, Martina
    Zucchelli, Giovanni
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DENTAL HYGIENE, 2024, 22 (02) : 465 - 470
  • [22] In-Vitro Biofilm Removal Efficacy Using Water Jet in Combination with Cold Plasma Technology on Dental Titanium Implants
    Matthes, Rutger
    Jablonowski, Lukasz
    Miebach, Lea
    Pitchika, Vinay
    Holtfreter, Birte
    Eberhard, Christian
    Seifert, Leo
    Gerling, Torsten
    Schlueter, Rabea
    Kocher, Thomas
    Bekeschus, Sander
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2023, 24 (02)
  • [23] Artificial biofilm removal in a peri-implant mucositis model: Efficacy of air polishing technology as adjunct to ultrasonic debridement alone and impact of the site and the depth of mucosal tunnel-An in vitro study
    Discepoli, Nicola
    Mirra, Raffaele
    Vesentin, Cecilia
    Marruganti, Crystal
    Ferrari, Marco
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (02) : 242 - 250
  • [24] Air removal capacity of two different minimal invasive ECC systems: an in vitro comparison
    Stehouwer, Marco C.
    de Vroege, Roel
    PERFUSION-UK, 2019, 34 (07): : 561 - 567
  • [25] Correlation of two different devices for the evaluation of primary implant stability depending on dental implant length and bone density: An in vitro study
    Lee, Jungwon
    Lim, Young-Jun
    Ahn, Jin-Soo
    Kim, Bongju
    Baek, Yeon-Wha
    Lim, Bum-Soon
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (05):
  • [26] Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Different Irrigating Needles and Devices in Removal of Debris from Apical Third of Root Canal: An In-vitro SEM Study
    Srivastava, Isha
    Srivastava, Sanjeev
    Grover, Rohit
    Paliwal, Ajay
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL DENTISTRY, 2021, 12 (03) : 222 - 229
  • [27] In-Vitro Sorbent-Mediated Removal of Edoxaban from Human Plasma and Albumin Solution
    Angheloiu, Alexandra A.
    Tan, Yanglan
    Ruse, Cristian
    Shaffer, Scott A.
    Angheloiu, George O.
    DRUGS IN R&D, 2020, 20 (03) : 217 - 223
  • [28] In-Vitro Sorbent-Mediated Removal of Edoxaban from Human Plasma and Albumin Solution
    Alexandra A. Angheloiu
    Yanglan Tan
    Cristian Ruse
    Scott A. Shaffer
    George O. Angheloiu
    Drugs in R&D, 2020, 20 : 217 - 223
  • [29] In-vitro Sorbent-Mediated Removal of Edoxaban From Human Plasma and Albumin Solution
    Angheloiu, Alexandra A.
    Tan, Yanglan
    Ruse, Cristian I.
    Shaffer, Scott
    Angheloiu, George O.
    CIRCULATION, 2019, 140
  • [30] PHEMA cryogel for in-vitro removal of anti-dsDNA antibodies from SLE plasma
    Ozgur, Erdogan
    Bereli, Nilay
    Turkmen, Deniz
    Unal, Serhat
    Denizli, Adil
    MATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING C-MATERIALS FOR BIOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2011, 31 (05): : 915 - 920