Improving the performance of artificial intelligence models using the rotation forest technique for landslide susceptibility mapping

被引:0
|
作者
H. Shen
F. Huang
X. Fan
H. Shahabi
A. Shirzadi
D. Wang
C. Peng
X. Zhao
W. Chen
机构
[1] Shaanxi Nuclear Industry Engineering Survey Institute Co.,School of Civil Engineering and Architecture
[2] Ltd.,State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection
[3] Nanchang University,Department of Geomorphology, Faculty of Natural Resources
[4] Chengdu University of Technology,Department of Zrebar Lake Environmental Research, Kurdistan Studies Institute
[5] University of Kurdistan,Department of Rangeland and Watershed Management, Faculty of Natural Resources
[6] University of Kurdistan,College of Geology and Environment
[7] University of Kurdistan,undefined
[8] Institute of Water Conservancy Works Design of Xuzhou,undefined
[9] Sichuan Institute of Geological Engineering Investigation Group Co. Ltd,undefined
[10] Xi’an University of Science and Technology,undefined
关键词
Alternating decision tree; Ensemble models; J48 decision tree; Landslide spatial prediction; Random forest;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Landslide susceptibility assessment has always been the focus of landslide spatial prediction research. In the present study, Muchuan County was selected as the study area, and four well-known machine learning models were adopted, namely, rotation forest (RF), J48 decision tree (J48), alternating decision tree (ADTree) and random forest (RaF). They and their ensembles (RF-J48, RF-ADTree and RF-RaF) were applied to landslide spatial prediction in Muchuan County. Eleven landslide conditioning factors, including plan curvature, profile curvature, slope angle, elevation, topographic wetness index, land use, normalized difference vegetation index, soil, lithology, distance to roads and distance to rivers, were established. In addition, 279 landslide datasets were compiled and randomly divided into 195 landslide training datasets and 84 landslide verification datasets. The contributions of the eleven conditioning factors were analyzed by J48, ADTree, and RaF models, respectively. The results show that lithology, slope angle, elevation, land use, soil, and distance to roads were the six principal landslide conditioning factors. Then, the Jenks natural break method was used to divide the landslide susceptibility maps into five grades. In addition, the accuracy of the above six models was verified by implementing the receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. The RF-RaF model achieved the best performance, and the rest were ranked as follows: RF-ADTree model, RaF model, RF-J48 model, ADTree model and J48 model. The results could provide scientific references for local natural resource departments.
引用
收藏
页码:11239 / 11254
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Improving the performance of artificial intelligence models using the rotation forest technique for landslide susceptibility mapping
    Shen, H.
    Huang, F.
    Fan, X.
    Shahabi, H.
    Shirzadi, A.
    Wang, D.
    Peng, C.
    Zhao, X.
    Chen, W.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 20 (10) : 11239 - 11254
  • [2] Using the rotation and random forest models of ensemble learning to predict landslide susceptibility
    Zhao, Lingran
    Wu, Xueling
    Niu, Ruiqing
    Wang, Ying
    Zhang, Kaixiang
    [J]. GEOMATICS NATURAL HAZARDS & RISK, 2020, 11 (01) : 1542 - 1564
  • [3] Gully erosion susceptibility mapping using artificial intelligence and statistical models
    Razavi-Termeh, Seyed Vahid
    Sadeghi-Niaraki, Abolghasem
    Choi, Soo-Mi
    [J]. GEOMATICS NATURAL HAZARDS & RISK, 2020, 11 (01) : 821 - 845
  • [4] Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using Rotation Forest Ensemble Technique with Different Decision Trees in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China
    Fang, Zhice
    Wang, Yi
    Duan, Gonghao
    Peng, Ling
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (02) : 1 - 22
  • [5] Mapping landslide susceptibility and types using Random Forest
    Taalab, Khaled
    Cheng, Tao
    Zhang, Yang
    [J]. BIG EARTH DATA, 2018, 2 (02) : 159 - 178
  • [6] Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Based on Random Forest and Boosted Regression Tree Models, and a Comparison of Their Performance
    Park, Soyoung
    Kim, Jinsoo
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2019, 9 (05):
  • [7] Improving the forecast performance of landslide susceptibility mapping by using ensemble gradient boosting algorithms
    Ha, Hang
    Bui, Quynh Duy
    Tran, Dinh Trong
    Nguyen, Dinh Quoc
    Bui, Hanh Xuan
    Luu, Chinh
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024,
  • [8] Ubiquitous GIS-Based Forest Fire Susceptibility Mapping Using Artificial Intelligence Methods
    Razavi-Termeh, Seyed Vahid
    Sadeghi-Niaraki, Abolghasem
    Choi, Soo-Mi
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 12 (10)
  • [9] Landslide Detection and Landslide Susceptibility Mapping using Aerial Photos and Artificial Neural Networks
    Oh, Hyun-Joo
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2010, 26 (01) : 47 - 57
  • [10] Landslide susceptibility mapping using hybridized block modular intelligence model
    Shahri, Abbas Abbaszadeh
    Moud, Fardad Maghsoudi
    [J]. BULLETIN OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 80 (01) : 267 - 284