Cost comparison of open approach, transoral laser microsurgery and transoral robotic surgery for partial and total laryngectomies

被引:0
|
作者
Manon Dombrée
Ralph Crott
Georges Lawson
Pascal Janne
Annick Castiaux
Bruno Krug
机构
[1] University of Namur,Business Administration Department
[2] University of Namur,Namur Research Institute for Life Sciences
[3] CHU UCL Mont-Godinne–Dinant,Department of Head and Neck Surgery
[4] CHU UCL Mont-Godinne–Dinant,Administration
[5] CHU UCL Mont-Godinne–Dinant,Nuclear Medicine Division
[6] Université Catholique de Louvain,Institute of Health and Society
[7] Université Catholique de Louvain,undefined
关键词
Cost analysis; Activity-based costing; Laryngeal cancer; Laryngectomy; Robotic surgery;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Activity-based costing is used to give a better insight into the actual cost structure of open, transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) and transoral robotic surgery (TORS) supraglottic and total laryngectomies. Cost data were obtained from hospital administration, personnel and vendor structured interviews. A process map identified 17 activities, to which the detailed cost data are related. One-way sensitivity analyses on the patient throughput, the cost of the equipment or operative times were performed. The total cost for supraglottic open (135–203 min), TLM (110–210 min) and TORS (35–130 min) approaches were 3,349 € (3,193–3,499 €), 3,461 € (3,207–3,664 €) and 5,650 € (4,297–5,974 €), respectively. For total laryngectomy, the overall cost were 3,581 € (3,215–3,846 €) for open and 6,767 € (6,418–7,389 €) for TORS. TORS cost is mostly influenced by equipment (54 %) where the other procedures are predominantly determined by personnel cost (about 45 %). Even when we doubled the yearly case-load, used the shortest operative times or a calculation without robot equipment costs we did not reach cost equivalence. TORS is more expensive than standard approaches and mainly influenced by purchase and maintenance costs and the use of proprietary instruments. Further trials on long-term outcomes and costs following TORS are needed to evaluate its cost-effectiveness.
引用
收藏
页码:2825 / 2834
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of functional and oncological treatment outcomes after transoral robotic surgery and open surgery for supraglottic laryngeal cancer
    Karabulut, B.
    Deveci, I.
    Surmeli, M.
    Sahin-Yilmaz, A.
    Oysu, C.
    JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2018, 132 (09): : 832 - 836
  • [42] Transoral Robotic Surgery Using the Thulium:YAG Laser A Prospective Study
    Van Abel, Kathryn M.
    Moore, Eric J.
    Carlson, Matthew L.
    Davidson, Jennifer A.
    Garcia, Joaquin J.
    Olsen, Steven M.
    Olsen, Kerry D.
    ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2012, 138 (02) : 158 - 166
  • [43] Expert perspectives for transoral robotic versus laser surgery for supraglottic carcinomas
    Loubieres, Charlotte
    Hans, Stephane
    Lechien, Jerome R.
    Ansarin, Mohssen
    Atallah, Sarah
    Barbut, Jonathan
    Bizeau, Alain
    Burkey, Brian
    Ceruse, Philippe
    Choussy, Olivier
    Couineau, Florent
    del Pujol, Erwan De Mones
    Dolivet, Gilles
    Fakhry, Nicolas
    Garrel, Renaud
    Giger, Roland
    Golusinski, Wojciech
    Gorphe, Philippe
    Lorentz, Clemence
    Malard, Olivier
    Meccariello, Giuseppe
    Moriniere, Sylvain
    Pellini, Raul
    Saroul, Nicolas
    Tagliabue, Marta
    Vergez, Sebastien
    Vilaseca, Isabel
    Villeneuve, Alexandre
    Baudouin, Robin
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2024, : 907 - 917
  • [44] Feasibility and Clinical Outcomes of Transoral Robotic Surgery and Transoral Robot-Assisted Carbon Dioxide Laser for Hypopharyngeal Carcinoma
    Durmus, Kasim
    Kucur, Cuneyt
    Uysal, Ismail O.
    Dziegielewski, Peter T.
    Ozer, Enver
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 26 (01) : 237 - 239
  • [45] Comparison of transoral robotic surgery with other surgeries for obstructive sleep apnea
    Yung-An Tsou
    Wen-Dien Chang
    Scientific Reports, 10
  • [46] Transoral Robotic Surgery with Laser for Head and Neck Cancers: A Feasibility Study
    Benazzo, Marco
    Canzi, Pietro
    Occhini, Antonio
    ORL-JOURNAL FOR OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2012, 74 (03): : 124 - 128
  • [47] Comparison of transoral robotic surgery with other surgeries for obstructive sleep apnea
    Tsou, Yung-An
    Chang, Wen-Dien
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [48] Transoral Robotic Surgery in the Seated Position: Rethinking Our Operative Approach
    Moore, Eric J.
    Van Abel, Kathryn M.
    Olsen, Kerry D.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2017, 127 (01): : 122 - 126
  • [49] Transoral Robotic Approach to Parapharyngeal Space Tumors: Changes in Paradigm of Surgery
    Sharma, Vikas
    Panda, Naresh K.
    Bakshi, Jaimanti
    Shrestha, Prazwal
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2024, 76 (05) : 4974 - 4978
  • [50] A 9-year analysis of transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) of head and neck cancer on their potential suitability for transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for estimation of future TORS-specific caseload
    Von Scotti, F.
    Kapsreiter, M.
    Scherl, C.
    Iro, H.
    Bohr, C.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 22 (10) : 2949 - 2953