Cost comparison of open approach, transoral laser microsurgery and transoral robotic surgery for partial and total laryngectomies

被引:0
|
作者
Manon Dombrée
Ralph Crott
Georges Lawson
Pascal Janne
Annick Castiaux
Bruno Krug
机构
[1] University of Namur,Business Administration Department
[2] University of Namur,Namur Research Institute for Life Sciences
[3] CHU UCL Mont-Godinne–Dinant,Department of Head and Neck Surgery
[4] CHU UCL Mont-Godinne–Dinant,Administration
[5] CHU UCL Mont-Godinne–Dinant,Nuclear Medicine Division
[6] Université Catholique de Louvain,Institute of Health and Society
[7] Université Catholique de Louvain,undefined
关键词
Cost analysis; Activity-based costing; Laryngeal cancer; Laryngectomy; Robotic surgery;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Activity-based costing is used to give a better insight into the actual cost structure of open, transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) and transoral robotic surgery (TORS) supraglottic and total laryngectomies. Cost data were obtained from hospital administration, personnel and vendor structured interviews. A process map identified 17 activities, to which the detailed cost data are related. One-way sensitivity analyses on the patient throughput, the cost of the equipment or operative times were performed. The total cost for supraglottic open (135–203 min), TLM (110–210 min) and TORS (35–130 min) approaches were 3,349 € (3,193–3,499 €), 3,461 € (3,207–3,664 €) and 5,650 € (4,297–5,974 €), respectively. For total laryngectomy, the overall cost were 3,581 € (3,215–3,846 €) for open and 6,767 € (6,418–7,389 €) for TORS. TORS cost is mostly influenced by equipment (54 %) where the other procedures are predominantly determined by personnel cost (about 45 %). Even when we doubled the yearly case-load, used the shortest operative times or a calculation without robot equipment costs we did not reach cost equivalence. TORS is more expensive than standard approaches and mainly influenced by purchase and maintenance costs and the use of proprietary instruments. Further trials on long-term outcomes and costs following TORS are needed to evaluate its cost-effectiveness.
引用
收藏
页码:2825 / 2834
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Transoral robotic surgery (TORS): Glottic microsurgery in a canine model
    O'Malley, BW
    Weinstein, GS
    Hockstein, NG
    JOURNAL OF VOICE, 2006, 20 (02) : 263 - 268
  • [22] Comparison study of transoral robotic surgery and radical open surgery for hypopharyngeal cancer
    Park, Young Min
    Byeon, Hyung Kwon
    Chung, Hyun Pil
    Choi, Eun Chang
    Kim, Se-Heon
    ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2013, 133 (06) : 641 - 648
  • [23] Parapharyngeal Space Surgery via a Transoral Approach Using a Robotic Surgical System: Transoral Robotic Surgery
    Park, Young Min
    De Virgilio, Armando
    Kim, Won Shik
    Chung, Hyun Pil
    Kim, Se-Heon
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2013, 23 (03): : 231 - 236
  • [24] Reflection on Transoral Robotic Surgery vs Transoral Laser Microsurgery in HPV-Positive Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma-Reply
    O'Hara, James T.
    Hurt, Christopher N.
    Jones, Terry M.
    JAMA OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2025,
  • [25] Assessment of Margins in Transoral Laser and Robotic Surgery
    Hamzany, Yaniv
    Brasnu, Daniel
    Shpitzer, Thomas
    Shvero, Jacob
    RAMBAM MAIMONIDES MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 5 (02):
  • [26] Design and control of a novel robotic microsurgical forceps for Transoral Laser Microsurgery
    Chauhan, Manish
    Deshpande, Nikhil
    Barresi, Giacinto
    Pacchierotti, Claudio
    Prattichizzo, Domenico
    Caldwell, Darwin G.
    Mattos, Leonardo S.
    2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED INTELLIGENT MECHATRONICS (AIM), 2017, : 737 - 742
  • [27] Oropharyngeal free flap reconstruction: Transoral robotic surgery versus open approach
    Porcuna, David Viros
    Soria, Constanza Vina
    Poyatos, Jordi Vila
    Viarnes, Mar Palau
    Lopez, Paloma Malagon
    Lluch, Carlota Gonzalez
    Sune, Carmen Higueras
    Guisasola, Carlos M. Pollan
    Lopez, Cristian Carrasco
    LARYNGOSCOPE INVESTIGATIVE OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2023, 8 (06): : 1564 - 1570
  • [28] Cost-Effective and Safe Dental Protection for Transoral Laser Microsurgery
    Ozgursoy, Ozan B.
    Garvey, Christopher
    JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2010, 39 (03): : E16 - E17
  • [29] Soft robotic manipulator for intraoperative MRI-guided transoral laser microsurgery
    Fang, Ge
    Chow, Marco C. K.
    Ho, Justin D. L.
    He, Zhuoliang
    Wang, Kui
    Ng, T. C.
    Tsoi, James K. H.
    Chan, Po-Ling
    Chang, Hing-Chiu
    Chan, Danny Tat-Ming
    Liu, Yun-hui
    Holsinger, Christopher
    Chan, Jason Ying-Kuen
    Kwok, Ka-Wai
    SCIENCE ROBOTICS, 2021, 6 (57)
  • [30] A cost effective custom dental guard for transoral robotic surgery
    Daniel Benito
    Margaret C. Michel
    Punam G. Thakkar
    Joseph F. Goodman
    Nader Sadeghi
    Arjun S. Joshi
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2020, 14 : 91 - 94