Cost comparison of open approach, transoral laser microsurgery and transoral robotic surgery for partial and total laryngectomies

被引:0
|
作者
Manon Dombrée
Ralph Crott
Georges Lawson
Pascal Janne
Annick Castiaux
Bruno Krug
机构
[1] University of Namur,Business Administration Department
[2] University of Namur,Namur Research Institute for Life Sciences
[3] CHU UCL Mont-Godinne–Dinant,Department of Head and Neck Surgery
[4] CHU UCL Mont-Godinne–Dinant,Administration
[5] CHU UCL Mont-Godinne–Dinant,Nuclear Medicine Division
[6] Université Catholique de Louvain,Institute of Health and Society
[7] Université Catholique de Louvain,undefined
关键词
Cost analysis; Activity-based costing; Laryngeal cancer; Laryngectomy; Robotic surgery;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Activity-based costing is used to give a better insight into the actual cost structure of open, transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) and transoral robotic surgery (TORS) supraglottic and total laryngectomies. Cost data were obtained from hospital administration, personnel and vendor structured interviews. A process map identified 17 activities, to which the detailed cost data are related. One-way sensitivity analyses on the patient throughput, the cost of the equipment or operative times were performed. The total cost for supraglottic open (135–203 min), TLM (110–210 min) and TORS (35–130 min) approaches were 3,349 € (3,193–3,499 €), 3,461 € (3,207–3,664 €) and 5,650 € (4,297–5,974 €), respectively. For total laryngectomy, the overall cost were 3,581 € (3,215–3,846 €) for open and 6,767 € (6,418–7,389 €) for TORS. TORS cost is mostly influenced by equipment (54 %) where the other procedures are predominantly determined by personnel cost (about 45 %). Even when we doubled the yearly case-load, used the shortest operative times or a calculation without robot equipment costs we did not reach cost equivalence. TORS is more expensive than standard approaches and mainly influenced by purchase and maintenance costs and the use of proprietary instruments. Further trials on long-term outcomes and costs following TORS are needed to evaluate its cost-effectiveness.
引用
收藏
页码:2825 / 2834
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cost comparison of open approach, transoral laser microsurgery and transoral robotic surgery for partial and total laryngectomies
    Dombree, Manon
    Crott, Ralph
    Lawson, Georges
    Janne, Pascal
    Castiaux, Annick
    Krug, Bruno
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2014, 271 (10) : 2825 - 2834
  • [2] Transoral Laser Microsurgery for Managing Laryngeal Stenosis After Reconstructive Partial Laryngectomies
    Lucioni, Marco
    Bertolin, Andy
    Lionello, Marco
    Giacomelli, Luciano
    Ghirardo, Guido
    Rizzotto, Giuseppe
    Marioni, Gino
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2017, 127 (02): : 359 - 365
  • [3] Transoral robotic surgery and transoral laser microsurgery for oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer
    Sumer B.D.
    Goyal V.
    Truelson J.M.
    Myers L.L.
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2013, 7 (4) : 377 - 383
  • [4] Transoral robotic surgery vs transoral laser microsurgery for resection of supraglottic cancer: a pilot surgery
    Ansarin, Mohssen
    Zorzi, Stefano
    Massaro, Maria Angela
    Tagliabue, Marta
    Proh, Michele
    Giugliano, Gioacchino
    Calabrese, Luca
    Chiesa, Fausto
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2014, 10 (01): : 107 - 112
  • [5] Laryngeal Cancer Surgery: History and Current Indications of Transoral Laser Microsurgery and Transoral Robotic Surgery
    Hans, Stephane
    Baudouin, Robin
    Circiu, Marta P.
    Couineau, Florent
    Lisan, Quentin
    Crevier-Buchman, Lise
    Lechien, Jerome R.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (19)
  • [6] Lingual Thyroidectomy: The Mayo Clinic Experience With Transoral Laser Microsurgery and Transoral Robotic Surgery
    Howard, Brittany E.
    Moore, Eric J.
    Hinni, Michael L.
    ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 2014, 123 (03): : 183 - 187
  • [7] Outcomes of transoral laser microsurgery and transoral robotic surgery in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma
    Sievert, Matti
    Goncalves, Miguel
    Zbidat, Ali
    Traxdorf, Maximilian
    Mueller, Sarina K.
    Iro, Heinrich
    Gostian, Antoniu-Oreste
    AURIS NASUS LARYNX, 2021, 48 (02) : 295 - 301
  • [8] Oncologic outcomes of transoral laser microsurgery versus open partial laryngectomies in the management of early stage glottic carcinoma
    Gong, Hongli
    Huang, Qiang
    Shi, Yong
    Gao, Chunli
    Hsueh, Chi-Yao
    Wu, Chunping
    Tao, Lei
    Zhang, Ming
    Zhou, Jian
    Cao, Pengyu
    Zhou, Liang
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2022, 43 (06)
  • [9] Transoral Laser Microsurgery and Transoral Robotic Surgery in Aging Patients: A State-of-The-Art Review
    Lechien, Jerome R.
    CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS IN AGING, 2024, 19 : 2121 - 2132
  • [10] Successful Application of Transoral Robotic Surgery in Failures of Traditional Transoral Laser Microsurgery: Critical Considerations
    Vicini, Claudio
    Leone, Carlo Antonio
    Montevecchi, Filippo
    Dinelli, Elisa
    Seccia, Veronica
    Dallan, Iacopo
    ORL-JOURNAL FOR OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2014, 76 (02): : 98 - 104