Ovarian and tubal torsion: Imaging findings on US, CT, and MRI

被引:83
|
作者
Lourenco A.P. [1 ]
Swenson D. [1 ]
Tubbs R.J. [2 ]
Lazarus E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Rhode Island Hospital, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI 02903
[2] Department of Emergency Medicine, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence
关键词
Computed tomography; Magnetic resonance imaging; Ovarian torsion; Pelvic pain; Ultrasound;
D O I
10.1007/s10140-013-1163-3
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Accurate diagnosis of adnexal torsion is often challenging, as clinical presentation is nonspecific and the differential for pelvic pain is broad. However, prompt diagnosis and treatment is critical to good clinical outcomes and preservation of the ovary and/or fallopian tube. Ultrasound (US) imaging is most frequently used to assess torsion. However, as computed tomography (CT) utilization in the emergency setting has increased, there are times when CT is the initial imaging test. Additionally, the nonspecific clinical presentation may initially be interpreted as gastrointestinal in etiology, where CT is the preferred exam. For these reasons, it is imperative to know the findings of adnexal torsion on CT as well as US. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is helpful in cases where the diagnosis remains unclear and is particularly helpful in the young or pregnant patient with equivocal sonographic findings, as it provides excellent soft tissue contrast without ionizing radiation. This article will illustrate the findings of surgically confirmed ovarian and fallopian tube torsion on US, CT, and MRI, including those in the pregnant patient. Ovarian enlargement, adnexal mass, twisting of the vascular pedicle, edematous and heterogeneous appearance of the ovary, peripheral ovarian follicles, free fluid, uterine deviation towards the side of torsion, adnexal fat stranding, tubal dilatation, and decreased adnexal enhancement will be reviewed. Familiarity with the range of imaging findings across multiple modalities is key to improving the likelihood of timely diagnosis and therefore improved clinical outcomes. © 2013 Am Soc Emergency Radiol.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 187
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Pictorial US, CT and MRI Findings of Common Hepatic Tumours
    Mulla, Mubashir
    Singh, Rajeev
    CURRENT MEDICAL IMAGING, 2010, 6 (03) : 178 - 190
  • [42] Sclerosing stromal tumor of the ovary: US, CT, and MRI findings
    P. Torricelli
    A. Caruso Lombardi
    F. Boselli
    G. Rossi
    Abdominal Imaging, 2002, 27 : 588 - 591
  • [43] Sclerosing stromal tumor of the ovary: US, CT, and MRI findings
    Torricelli, P
    Lombardi, AC
    Boselli, F
    Rossi, G
    ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2002, 27 (05): : 588 - 591
  • [44] Uterine Angiolipoleiomyoma with US, CT, and MRI Findings: A Case Report
    Seo, Geojeong
    Park, Jinyoung
    Lee, Eunjoo
    Han, Jiyeon
    Kim, Dasom
    Kim, Donghyun
    Park, Jungwon
    Kwag, Minha
    Park, Hayoung
    CURRENT MEDICAL IMAGING, 2022, 18 (11) : 1248 - 1252
  • [45] DIAGNOSIS OF HCC BY IMAGING BIOMARKERS: US, CT, AND MRI
    Zech, C. J.
    TUMOR BIOLOGY, 2010, 31 : S18 - S19
  • [46] Peri-intraprocedural imaging: US, CT, and MRI
    Crocetti, Laura
    Della Pina, Clotilde
    Cioni, Dania
    Lencioni, Riccardo
    ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2011, 36 (06): : 648 - 660
  • [47] Imaging of hyperparathyroidism: US, CT, MRI and MIBI scintigraphy
    Giron, J
    Ouhayoun, E
    Dahan, M
    Berjaud, J
    Esquerre, JP
    Senac, JP
    Railhac, JJ
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1996, 21 (03) : 167 - 173
  • [48] Peri-intraprocedural imaging: US, CT, and MRI
    Laura Crocetti
    Clotilde Della Pina
    Dania Cioni
    Riccardo Lencioni
    Abdominal Imaging, 2011, 36 : 648 - 660
  • [49] Imaging of Head and Neck Cancer With CT, MRI, and US
    Junn, Jacqueline C.
    Soderlund, Karl A.
    Glastonbury, Christine M.
    SEMINARS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2020, 51 (01) : 3 - 12
  • [50] Adnexal Torsion: Diagnostic Imaging Features on CT and MRI With Pathologic Correlation
    Duigenan, S.
    Lee, S.
    Oliva, E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 194 (05)