Ovarian and tubal torsion: Imaging findings on US, CT, and MRI

被引:83
|
作者
Lourenco A.P. [1 ]
Swenson D. [1 ]
Tubbs R.J. [2 ]
Lazarus E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Rhode Island Hospital, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI 02903
[2] Department of Emergency Medicine, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence
关键词
Computed tomography; Magnetic resonance imaging; Ovarian torsion; Pelvic pain; Ultrasound;
D O I
10.1007/s10140-013-1163-3
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Accurate diagnosis of adnexal torsion is often challenging, as clinical presentation is nonspecific and the differential for pelvic pain is broad. However, prompt diagnosis and treatment is critical to good clinical outcomes and preservation of the ovary and/or fallopian tube. Ultrasound (US) imaging is most frequently used to assess torsion. However, as computed tomography (CT) utilization in the emergency setting has increased, there are times when CT is the initial imaging test. Additionally, the nonspecific clinical presentation may initially be interpreted as gastrointestinal in etiology, where CT is the preferred exam. For these reasons, it is imperative to know the findings of adnexal torsion on CT as well as US. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is helpful in cases where the diagnosis remains unclear and is particularly helpful in the young or pregnant patient with equivocal sonographic findings, as it provides excellent soft tissue contrast without ionizing radiation. This article will illustrate the findings of surgically confirmed ovarian and fallopian tube torsion on US, CT, and MRI, including those in the pregnant patient. Ovarian enlargement, adnexal mass, twisting of the vascular pedicle, edematous and heterogeneous appearance of the ovary, peripheral ovarian follicles, free fluid, uterine deviation towards the side of torsion, adnexal fat stranding, tubal dilatation, and decreased adnexal enhancement will be reviewed. Familiarity with the range of imaging findings across multiple modalities is key to improving the likelihood of timely diagnosis and therefore improved clinical outcomes. © 2013 Am Soc Emergency Radiol.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 187
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Hepatic toxocariasis:: US, CT and MRI findings
    Kabaalioglu, A
    Çeken, K
    Alimoglu, E
    Saba, R
    Apaydin, A
    ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN, 2005, 26 (04): : 329 - 332
  • [22] OVARIAN TORSION - CT AND MR-IMAGING APPEARANCES
    KIMURA, I
    TOGASHI, K
    KAWAKAMI, S
    TAKAKURA, K
    MORI, T
    KONISHI, J
    RADIOLOGY, 1994, 190 (02) : 337 - 341
  • [23] Isolated tubal torsion: CT features
    Skinner, S
    Voyvodic, F
    Scroop, R
    Sanders, T
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2001, 56 (02) : 155 - 156
  • [24] Ovarian Torsion: Diagnostic Features on CT and MRI With Pathologic Correlation
    Duigenan, Shauna
    Oliva, Esther
    Lee, Susanna I.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2012, 198 (02) : W122 - W131
  • [25] Classics in abdominal imaging: the “whirlpool” sign of ovarian torsion on MRI
    Nikolaos-Achilleas Arkoudis
    Evgenia Efthymiou
    Christos Koutserimpas
    Stavros Spiliopoulos
    Abdominal Radiology, 2024, 49 : 678 - 680
  • [26] Classics in abdominal imaging: the "whirlpool" sign of ovarian torsion on MRI
    Arkoudis, Nikolaos-Achilleas
    Efthymiou, Evgenia
    Koutserimpas, Christos
    Spiliopoulos, Stavros
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2024, 49 (02) : 678 - 680
  • [27] Ovarian cancer: the clinical role of US, CT, and MRI
    Kaori Togashi
    European Radiology, 2003, 13 : L87 - L104
  • [28] Ovarian cancer: the clinical role of US, CT, and MRI
    Togashi, K
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2003, 13 (Suppl 6) : L87 - L104
  • [29] Medulloblastoma with extensive nodularity: US, CT and MRI findings
    Bekiesinska-Figatowska, Monika
    Jurkiewicz, Elzbieta
    Uliasz, Maria
    Mazurczak, Tomasz
    Barszcz, Slawomir
    Grajkowska, Wieslawa
    Roszkowski, Marcin
    POLISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2008, 73 (04) : 32 - 35
  • [30] Fascioliasis: US, CT, and MRI findings with new observations
    A. Kabaalioğlu
    M. Çubuk
    U. Şenol
    C. Çevikol
    K. Karaali
    A. Apaydin
    T. Sindel
    E. Lüleci
    Abdominal Imaging, 2000, 25 : 400 - 404