Possible Root Infection of Cercospora beticola in Sugar Beet

被引:0
|
作者
Jessica Vereijssen
Hans J.H.M. Schneider
Aad A.J. Termorshuizen
机构
[1] IRS (Institute of Sugar Beet Research),Biological Farming Systems
[2] Wageningen University,undefined
来源
关键词
disease; primary infection site; root incubation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A potential primary infection site of the foliar pathogen Cercospora beticola in sugar beet is described. Sugar beet seedlings of the susceptible cv. Auris were grown in a standard soil for 14 days. A monoconidial culture of a C. beticola isolate was grown to produce conidia. In experiment 1, roots were immersed in a conidial suspension of isolate code IRS 00-4, or in tap water (control), for 2 days. After incubation seedlings were potted in a peat – fine river sand mixture and placed at low relative humidity (RH) (<80%) or high RH (≈100%). Twelve days after infection, seedlings at high RH showed more disease incidence (90%) than seedlings grown at low RH (disease incidence = 25%), whereas no disease symptoms developed in the control seedlings. Cercospora leaf spots (CLSs) developed on the cotyledons, leaves, petioles and stems of the seedlings. In experiment 2, roots were immersed in a conidial suspension of isolate code IRS 00-2 for 5 h. Thirty-four days after infection at high RH, 100% disease incidence was observed in the treated seedlings and one CLS in the control treatment. First indications of leaf spot development were observed as reddish purple discolouration of individual parenchymatic cells. Because splash dispersal and symptoms due to infested soil were excluded, we showed that it is possible to obtain CLS symptoms in sugar beet seedlings when their roots were immersed in conidial suspensions of C. beticola, thus demonstrating that roots can be a primary infection site.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 106
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Managing resistance of Cercospora beticola Sacc for integrated disease management in sugar beet
    Budakov, D.
    Stojsin, V.
    Bagi, F.
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2011, 101 (06) : S22 - S22
  • [32] Fungal diseases of sugar beet (Cercospora beticola, Erysiphe betae) experience with IFS-Model Cercospora
    Spitzer, T
    Fiser, F
    LISTY CUKROVARNICKE A REPARSKE, 2001, 117 (02): : 44 - 46
  • [33] SUGAR BEET QUALITY IN DEPENDENCE ON VARIETY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF FUNGICIDES ON CERCOSPORA BETICOLA SACC
    Kristek, Andrija
    Kristek, Suzana
    Kraljicak, Zeljko
    Resic, Ivo
    Radan, Zvonko
    LISTY CUKROVARNICKE A REPARSKE, 2015, 131 (5-6): : 173 - 177
  • [34] Using fungicides and improved host resistance to manage Cercospora beticola in sugar beet
    Khan, M. F. R.
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2020, 110 (12) : 13 - 13
  • [35] ROOT YIELD AND QUALITY DEPENDING ON SUGAR BEET HYBRIDS AND PROTECTION AGAINST FUNGI CERCOSPORA. BETICOLA SACC.
    Kristek, Andrija
    Kristek, Suzana
    Galovic, Stjepan
    CEREAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2008, 36 : 375 - 378
  • [36] Non-invasive Presymptomatic Detection of Cercospora beticola Infection and Identification of Early Metabolic Responses in Sugar Beet
    Arens, Nadja
    Backhaus, Andreas
    Doell, Stefanie
    Fischer, Sandra
    Seiffert, Udo
    Mock, Hans-Peter
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2016, 7
  • [37] Fluctuations in Number of Cercospora beticola Conidia in Relationship to Environment and Disease Severity in Sugar Beet
    Khan, J.
    Qi, A.
    Khan, M. F. R.
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2009, 99 (07) : 796 - 801
  • [38] NEGATIVE RELATIONSHIP OF STOMATAL SIZE AND DENSITY WITH RESISTANCE IN SUGAR-BEET TO CERCOSPORA BETICOLA
    RUPPEL, EG
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1972, 62 (09) : 1095 - &
  • [39] Improvement of Lesion Phenotyping in Cercospora beticola-Sugar Beet Interaction by Hyperspectral Imaging
    Leucker, Marlene
    Mahlein, Anne-Katrin
    Steiner, Ulrike
    Oerke, Erich -Christian
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2016, 106 (02) : 177 - 184
  • [40] MULTIVARIATE MODELS FOR ESTIMATION OF YIELD LOSSES IN SUGAR-BEET DUE TO CERCOSPORA BETICOLA
    KELBER, E
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PFLANZENKRANKHEITEN UND PFLANZENSCHUTZ-JOURNAL OF PLANT DISEASES AND PROTECTION, 1977, 84 (03): : 174 - 186