Possible Root Infection of Cercospora beticola in Sugar Beet

被引:0
|
作者
Jessica Vereijssen
Hans J.H.M. Schneider
Aad A.J. Termorshuizen
机构
[1] IRS (Institute of Sugar Beet Research),Biological Farming Systems
[2] Wageningen University,undefined
来源
关键词
disease; primary infection site; root incubation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A potential primary infection site of the foliar pathogen Cercospora beticola in sugar beet is described. Sugar beet seedlings of the susceptible cv. Auris were grown in a standard soil for 14 days. A monoconidial culture of a C. beticola isolate was grown to produce conidia. In experiment 1, roots were immersed in a conidial suspension of isolate code IRS 00-4, or in tap water (control), for 2 days. After incubation seedlings were potted in a peat – fine river sand mixture and placed at low relative humidity (RH) (<80%) or high RH (≈100%). Twelve days after infection, seedlings at high RH showed more disease incidence (90%) than seedlings grown at low RH (disease incidence = 25%), whereas no disease symptoms developed in the control seedlings. Cercospora leaf spots (CLSs) developed on the cotyledons, leaves, petioles and stems of the seedlings. In experiment 2, roots were immersed in a conidial suspension of isolate code IRS 00-2 for 5 h. Thirty-four days after infection at high RH, 100% disease incidence was observed in the treated seedlings and one CLS in the control treatment. First indications of leaf spot development were observed as reddish purple discolouration of individual parenchymatic cells. Because splash dispersal and symptoms due to infested soil were excluded, we showed that it is possible to obtain CLS symptoms in sugar beet seedlings when their roots were immersed in conidial suspensions of C. beticola, thus demonstrating that roots can be a primary infection site.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 106
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] HARMFUL FACTORS IN SUGAR BEET - DISEASES: CERCOSPORA LEAF SPOT (CERCOSPORA BETICOLA SACC.)
    Bittner, Vit
    LISTY CUKROVARNICKE A REPARSKE, 2012, 128 (12): : 374 - 376
  • [22] Transcript Profiles in Sugar Beet Genotypes Uncover Timing and Strength of Defense Reactions to Cercospora beticola Infection
    Weltmeier, Fridtjof
    Maeser, Anja
    Menze, Andreas
    Hennig, Steffen
    Schad, Martina
    Breuer, Frank
    Schulz, Britta
    Holtschulte, Bernd
    Nehls, Reinhard
    Stahl, Dietmar J.
    MOLECULAR PLANT-MICROBE INTERACTIONS, 2011, 24 (07) : 758 - 772
  • [23] First Report of QoI Insensitive Cercospora beticola on Sugar Beet in Ontario, Canada
    Trueman, C. L.
    Hanson, L. E.
    Rosenzweig, N.
    Jiang, Q. W.
    Kirk, W. W.
    PLANT DISEASE, 2013, 97 (09) : 1255 - 1255
  • [24] EFFICACY OF TREATMENTS IN CONTROLLING CERCOSPORIOSIS (Cercospora beticola Sacc.) IN SUGAR BEET
    Toth, Kinga
    Cristea, Stelica
    SCIENTIFIC PAPERS-SERIES A-AGRONOMY, 2020, 63 (02): : 236 - 239
  • [25] VARIATION AMONG ISOLATES OF CERCOSPORA-BETICOLA FROM SUGAR-BEET
    RUPPEL, EG
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1972, 62 (01) : 134 - &
  • [26] Overview of sugar beet leaf spot disease caused by Cercospora beticola Sacc
    EL Housni, Zakariae
    Abdessalem, Tahiri
    Radouane, Nabil
    Ezrari, Said
    Zegoumou, Abderrahim
    Ouijja, Abderrahman
    ARCHIVES OF PHYTOPATHOLOGY AND PLANT PROTECTION, 2023, : 503 - 528
  • [27] Indirect evidence for sexual reproduction in Cercospora beticola populations from sugar beet
    Groenewald, M.
    Linde, C. C.
    Groenewald, J. Z.
    Crous, P. W.
    PLANT PATHOLOGY, 2008, 57 (01) : 25 - 32
  • [28] Regular rainfall reduces efficacy of fungicides at controlling Cercospora beticola in sugar beet
    Khan, M. F. R.
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2021, 111 (10) : 142 - 142
  • [29] ON THE SUSCEPTIBILITY TO CERCOSPORA-BETICOLA SACC OF SOME SUGAR-BEET GENOTYPES
    DAMBRA, V
    FERRATA, M
    RIVISTA DI PATOLOGIA VEGETALE, 1983, 19 (02): : 99 - 106
  • [30] Monitoring Fungicide Sensitivity of Cercospora beticola of Sugar Beet for Disease Management Decisions
    Secor, Gary A.
    Rivera, Viviana V.
    Khan, M. F. R.
    Gudmestad, Neil C.
    PLANT DISEASE, 2010, 94 (11) : 1272 - 1282