A randomized controlled trial comparing low dose vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone gel for labor induction

被引:0
|
作者
Girija S. [1 ]
Manjunath A.P. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Dept of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Manipal University, Dr TMA Pai Rotary Hospital Karkala, Manipal, Karnataka State
[2] Dept of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kasturba Medical College
关键词
dinoprostone; induction of labor; low dose; misoprostol;
D O I
10.1007/s13224-011-0031-x
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: To compare the safety and efficacy of low dose misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction Methods: It was an open label randomized controlled trial conducted at department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Dr TMA Pai Rotary Hospital, Karkala. The main outcome measure was induction-to-vaginal delivery interval. Secondary outcome measures were the labor characteristics, maternal complications and neonatal outcomes. Results: Out of 320 eligible women included for final analysis, 159 received misoprostol and 161 dinoprostone. There was no significant difference between the two groups in induction-to-vaginal delivery interval, mode of delivery, number of women delivering within 24 hours and neonatal outcomes. The efficacies of the two prostaglandins were similar. Conclusion: Low dose misoprostol is as efficient as dinoprostone in achieving active labor and delivering with in 24 hours. The maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with each group were similar. It is a cheaper alternative for labor induction. © 2011 Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecological Societies of India (FOGSI).
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 160
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Oral versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor in Enugu, Nigeria: a randomized controlled trial
    Ezechukwu, Paschalina Constance
    Ugwu, Emmanuel Onyebuchi
    Obi, Samuel Nnamdi
    Chigbu, Chibuike Ogwuegbu
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2015, 291 (03) : 537 - 544
  • [42] Titrated oral compared with vaginal misoprostol for labor induction: A randomized controlled trial - In reply
    Cheng, Shi-Yann
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 111 (06): : 1445 - 1445
  • [43] Oral versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor in Enugu, Nigeria: a randomized controlled trial
    Paschalina Constance Ezechukwu
    Emmanuel Onyebuchi Ugwu
    Samuel Nnamdi Obi
    Chibuike Ogwuegbu Chigbu
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2015, 291 : 537 - 544
  • [44] Twice-daily versus once-daily vaginal dinoprostone gel for induction of labor at term: A randomized controlled trial
    David, Marion
    Gueye, Henriette Paule
    Drame, M. Moustapha
    Sibiude, Jeanne
    Penager, Cecile
    Janky, Eustase
    Mandelbrot, Laurent
    Hcini, Najeh
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2024, 292 : 107 - 111
  • [45] Effectiveness of dinoprostone gel, misoprostol vaginal insert and dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labour in twin pregnancies
    Gent, J.
    Oliver, E.
    Quigley, H.
    Sharp, A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2023, 286 : 23 - 27
  • [46] Misoprostol for term labor induction: A randomized controlled trial
    Saeed, Gulshan A.
    Fakhar, Shazia
    Nisar, Nadia
    Alam, Ali Yawar
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 50 (01): : 15 - 19
  • [47] Combination of Foley Bulb and Vaginal Misoprostol Compared With Vaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Carbone, Jeanine F.
    Tuuli, Methodius G.
    Fogertey, Patricia J.
    Roehl, Kimberly A.
    Macones, George A.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 121 (02): : 247 - 252
  • [48] Combination of Foley Bulb and Vaginal Misoprostol Compared With Vaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Visser, Liesbeth
    de Graaf, Irene M.
    Mol, Ben Willem J.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 122 (01): : 156 - 157
  • [49] A comparison of misoprostol to dinoprostone vaginal insert for cervical ripening in labor induction
    Bennett, Carrie
    Yao, Meng
    Farrell, Ruth
    Goje, Oluwatosin
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 222 (01) : S145 - S146
  • [50] A randomized clinical trial comparing vaginal misoprostol to cervical Foley plus oral misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction
    Thigpen, B
    Bofill, J
    Bufkin, L
    Woodring, T
    Moore, L
    Morrison, J
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 191 (06) : S18 - S18