A randomized controlled trial comparing low dose vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone gel for labor induction

被引:0
|
作者
Girija S. [1 ]
Manjunath A.P. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Dept of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Manipal University, Dr TMA Pai Rotary Hospital Karkala, Manipal, Karnataka State
[2] Dept of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kasturba Medical College
关键词
dinoprostone; induction of labor; low dose; misoprostol;
D O I
10.1007/s13224-011-0031-x
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: To compare the safety and efficacy of low dose misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction Methods: It was an open label randomized controlled trial conducted at department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Dr TMA Pai Rotary Hospital, Karkala. The main outcome measure was induction-to-vaginal delivery interval. Secondary outcome measures were the labor characteristics, maternal complications and neonatal outcomes. Results: Out of 320 eligible women included for final analysis, 159 received misoprostol and 161 dinoprostone. There was no significant difference between the two groups in induction-to-vaginal delivery interval, mode of delivery, number of women delivering within 24 hours and neonatal outcomes. The efficacies of the two prostaglandins were similar. Conclusion: Low dose misoprostol is as efficient as dinoprostone in achieving active labor and delivering with in 24 hours. The maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with each group were similar. It is a cheaper alternative for labor induction. © 2011 Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecological Societies of India (FOGSI).
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 160
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of fetal safety of vaginal Misoprostol tablet and Dinoprostone gel for induction of labor: An open-label randomized control trial
    Samanta, Ajanta
    Rakshit, Bibek Mohan
    Mistri, Pallab Kumar
    Chakraborty, Arup
    Bag, Tarasankar
    Das, Piyali
    Pande, Arindam
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2023, 49 (09) : 2267 - 2272
  • [22] Misoprostol vaginal insert compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert a randomized controlled trial
    Wing, Deborah A.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 112 (04): : 801 - 812
  • [23] A randomized controlled trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter plus oxytocin for labor induction
    Moraes Filho, Olimpio B.
    Albuquerque, Rivaldo M.
    Cecatti, Jose G.
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2010, 89 (08) : 1045 - 1052
  • [24] RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF VAGINAL MISOPROSTOL AND INTRACERVICAL PROSTAGLANDIN E(2) GEL FOR INDUCTION OF LABOR AT TERM
    VARAKLIS, K
    GUMINA, R
    STUBBLEFIELD, PG
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 86 (04): : 541 - 544
  • [25] A prospective randomized trial of labor induction with vaginal controlled-release dinoprostone inserts with or without oxytocin and misoprostol plus oxytocin
    Tanir, H. M.
    Sener, T.
    Yildiz, C.
    Kaya, M.
    Kurt, I.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 35 (01): : 65 - 68
  • [26] Labor induction with prostaglandin E1 misoprostol compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert:: A randomized trial
    Sanchez-Ramos, L
    Peterson, DE
    Delke, I
    Gaudier, FL
    Kaunitz, AM
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 91 (03): : 401 - 405
  • [27] Oral Misoprostol and Vaginal Isosorbide Mononitrate for Labor Induction A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Collingham, Justin P.
    Fuh, Katherine C.
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    Pullen, Kristin M.
    Lyell, Deirdre J.
    El-Sayed, Yasser Y.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 116 (01): : 121 - 126
  • [28] Comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term: A randomized controlled trial
    Paungmora, N
    Herabutya, Y
    O-Prasertsawat, P
    Punyavachira, P
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2004, 30 (05) : 358 - 362
  • [29] High-dose vaginal misoprostol versus concentrated oxytocin plus low-dose vaginal misoprostol for midtrimester labor induction: A randomized trial
    Nuthalapaty, FS
    Ramsey, PS
    Biggio, JR
    Owen, J
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 193 (03) : 1065 - 1070
  • [30] Titrated oral compared with vaginal misoprostol for labor induction - A randomized controlled trial
    Cheng, Shi-Yann
    Ming, Ho
    Lee, Jui-Chi
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 111 (01): : 119 - 125