A randomized controlled trial comparing low dose vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone gel for labor induction

被引:0
|
作者
Girija S. [1 ]
Manjunath A.P. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Dept of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Manipal University, Dr TMA Pai Rotary Hospital Karkala, Manipal, Karnataka State
[2] Dept of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kasturba Medical College
关键词
dinoprostone; induction of labor; low dose; misoprostol;
D O I
10.1007/s13224-011-0031-x
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: To compare the safety and efficacy of low dose misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction Methods: It was an open label randomized controlled trial conducted at department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Dr TMA Pai Rotary Hospital, Karkala. The main outcome measure was induction-to-vaginal delivery interval. Secondary outcome measures were the labor characteristics, maternal complications and neonatal outcomes. Results: Out of 320 eligible women included for final analysis, 159 received misoprostol and 161 dinoprostone. There was no significant difference between the two groups in induction-to-vaginal delivery interval, mode of delivery, number of women delivering within 24 hours and neonatal outcomes. The efficacies of the two prostaglandins were similar. Conclusion: Low dose misoprostol is as efficient as dinoprostone in achieving active labor and delivering with in 24 hours. The maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with each group were similar. It is a cheaper alternative for labor induction. © 2011 Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecological Societies of India (FOGSI).
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 160
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Low Dose Vaginal Misoprostol and Dinoprostone Gel for Labor Induction
    Shivarudraiah, Girija
    Palaksha, Manjunath Attibele
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY OF INDIA, 2011, 61 (02): : 153 - 160
  • [2] Oral misoprostol, low dose vaginal misoprostol, and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: Randomized controlled trial
    Young, David C.
    Delaney, Tina
    Armson, B. Anthony
    Fanning, Cora
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (01):
  • [3] Is Low Dose Vaginal Misoprostol Better Than Dinoprostone Gel For Induction of Labor: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Madaan, Monika
    Agrawal, Swati
    Puri, Manju
    Nigam, Aruna
    Kaur, Harvinder
    Trivedi, Shubha Sagar
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2014, 8 (09) : OC31 - OC34
  • [4] Oral misoprostol or vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction:: A randomized controlled trial
    Dällenbach, P
    Boulvain, M
    Viardot, C
    Irion, O
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 188 (01) : 162 - 167
  • [5] Oral Misoprostol or vaginal Dinoprostone for labor induction? Randomized controlled trial
    Dallen-Bach, P
    Boulvain, M
    Viardot, C
    Irion, O
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 185 (06) : S108 - S108
  • [6] Oral and vaginal misoprostol compared with dinoprostone for induction of labor: A randomized controlled trial
    le Roux, PA
    Olarogun, JO
    Penny, J
    Anthony, J
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 99 (02): : 201 - 205
  • [7] A randomised controlled trial comparing low dose vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal gel for inducing labour at term
    Gregson, S
    Waterstone, M
    Norman, I
    Murrells, T
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2005, 112 (04) : 438 - 444
  • [8] A randomised trial comparing low dose vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for labour induction
    van Gemund, N
    Scherjon, S
    le Cessie, S
    van Leeuwen, JHS
    van Roosmalen, J
    Kanhai, HHH
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2004, 111 (01) : 42 - 49
  • [9] Oral misoprostol, low dose vaginal misoprostol, and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: Randomized controlled trial (vol 15, e0227245, 2020)
    Young, David C.
    Delaney, Tina
    Armson, B. Anthony
    Fanning, Cora
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (05):
  • [10] Misoprostol versus Dinoprostone for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial
    Shaheen, Nighat
    Khalil, Safia
    RAWAL MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 39 (03): : 307 - 310