Nonstationary-volatility robust panel unit root tests and the great moderation

被引:0
|
作者
Christoph Hanck
Robert Czudaj
机构
[1] University of Duisburg-Essen,Chair for Econometrics, Department of Economics
来源
关键词
Panel unit root test; Nonstationary volatility; Cross-sectional dependence; GDP stationarity; Inflation stationarity; C12; C23; E31; O40;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper argues that typical applications of panel unit root tests should take possible nonstationarity in the volatility process of the innovations of the panel time series into account. Nonstationary volatility arises, for instance, when there are structural breaks in the innovation variances. A prominent example is the reduction in GDP growth variances enjoyed by many industrialized countries, known as the ‘Great moderation.’ It also proposes a new testing approach for panel unit roots that is, unlike many existing tests, robust to such volatility processes. The panel test is based on Simes’ (Biometrika 73:751–754, 1986) classical multiple test, which combines evidence from time series unit root tests of the series in the panel. As time series tests, we employ the recent proposals of Cavaliere and Taylor (J Time Ser Anal 29:300–330, 2008b). The panel test is robust to general patterns of cross-sectional dependence and yet is straightforward to implement, only requiring valid p\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$p$$\end{document} values of time series tests, and no resampling. Simulations show other panel unit root tests to suffer from sometimes severe size distortions under nonstationary volatility and that this can be remedied using the test proposed here. We use the methods to test for unit roots in OECD panels of gross domestic products and inflation rates, yielding inference robust to the ‘Great moderation’. We find little evidence of trend stationarity and mixed evidence regarding inflation stationarity.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 187
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] TAR panel unit root tests and real convergence
    Beyaert, Arielle
    Camacho, Maximo
    REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2008, 12 (03) : 668 - 681
  • [32] Panel unit-root tests for heteroskedastic panels
    Herwartz, Helmut
    Maxand, Simone
    Raters, Fabian H. C.
    Walle, Yabibal M.
    STATA JOURNAL, 2018, 18 (01): : 184 - 196
  • [33] Incidental trends and the power of panel unit root tests
    Moon, Hyungsik Roger
    Perron, Benoit
    Phillips, Peter C. B.
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2007, 141 (02) : 416 - 459
  • [34] Robust tests of the unit root hypothesis should not be "modified"
    Thompson, SB
    ECONOMETRIC THEORY, 2004, 20 (02) : 360 - 381
  • [35] Pooled Panel Unit Root Tests and the Effect of Past Initialization
    Westerlund, Joakim
    ECONOMETRIC REVIEWS, 2016, 35 (03) : 396 - 427
  • [36] Panel unit root tests in the presence of a multifactor error structure
    Pesaran, M. Hashem
    Smith, L. Vanessa
    Yamagata, Takashi
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2013, 175 (02) : 94 - 115
  • [37] Generalized fixed-T panel unit root tests
    Karavias, Yiannis
    Tzavalis, Elias
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF STATISTICS, 2019, 46 (04) : 1227 - 1251
  • [38] Panel unit root tests of firm size and its growth
    Chen, JR
    Lu, WC
    APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2003, 10 (06) : 343 - 345
  • [39] Panel LM unit root tests with level and trend shifts
    Lee, Junsoo
    Tieslau, Margie
    ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2019, 80 : 1 - 10
  • [40] Simple panel unit root tests to detect changes in persistence
    Costantini, Mauro
    Gutierrez, Luciano
    ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2007, 96 (03) : 363 - 368