Effect of Interpregnancy Interval on Infant Low Birth Weight: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using the Michigan Maternally Linked Birth Database

被引:51
|
作者
Bao-Ping Zhu
Thu Le
机构
[1] National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion,Applied Sciences Branch, Division of Reproductive Health
[2] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,Michigan Department of Community Health
[3] Division of Epidemiology Services,undefined
关键词
low birth weight; birth interval; pregnancy spacing; cohort study;
D O I
10.1023/A:1025184304391
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To examine the relationship between interpregnancy interval and low birth weight (LBW), using the retrospective cohort design. Methods: We used the maternally linked Michigan livebirth data documented between 1989 and 2000 to evaluate LBW in relation to interpregnancy (i.e., delivery-to-conception) interval, overall and at levels of other reproductive risk factors. We fit separate logistic regression models for pairs of first-second, second-third, third-fourth, and fourth-fifth births to control for confounding. Results: Of the 565,911 infants identified, 5.5% had LBW. Univariate and stratified analyses showed that the risk for LBW was lowest when the interpregnancy interval was 18–23 months, and increased with shorter or longer intervals. This J-shaped relationship persisted after controlling for all risk factors simultaneously. For example, among the first-second birth pairs, the adjusted odds ratios (AORs) for LBW associated with interpregnancy intervals <6, 24–59, 60–95, and 96–136 months were 1.4 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.3–1.5), 1.5 (95% CI = 1.3–1.6), 1.1 (95% CI = 1.0–1.1) and 1.5 (95% CI = 1.3–1.8), respectively, compared with an interval of 18–23 months. Among the second-third birth pairs, the AORs were 1.5 (95% CI = 1.3–1.6), 1.3 (95% CI = 1.2–1.4), 1.1 (95% CI = 1.0–1.1), and 1.6 (95% CI = 1.3–2.0), respectively. Among the third-fourth birth pairs, the AORs were 1.2 (95% CI = 1.1–1.4), 1.3 (95% CI = 1.1–1.5), 1.0 (95% CI = 0.9–1.1), and 1.4 (95% CI = 1.0–2.0), respectively. Among the fourth-fifth birth pairs, the AORs were 1.3 (95% CI = 1.1–1.6), 1.2 (95% CI = 0.9–1.5), 1.1 (95% CI = 1.0–1.4), and 1.3 (95% CI = 0.8–2.3), respectively. The population attributable risk associated with interpregnancy intervals shorter than 18 months or longer than 23 months was 9.4%. Conclusion: These data suggest that spacing pregnancies appropriately could be used as a strategy for preventing LBW.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 178
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Increase in Weight in Low Birth Weight and Very Low Birth Weight Infants Fed Fortified Breast Milk versus Formula Milk: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Lok, Kris Yuet Wan
    Chau, Pui Hing
    Fan, Heidi Sze Lok
    Chan, Kam Ming
    Chan, Bill H.
    Fung, Genevieve P. C.
    Tarrant, Marie
    NUTRIENTS, 2017, 9 (05)
  • [32] Low birth weight and cardiovascular risk factors in Auckland adolescents: a retrospective cohort study
    Daly, Barbara
    Scragg, Robert
    Schaaf, David
    Metcalf, Patricia
    NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 118 (1220) : 24 - 34
  • [33] The Israel Neonatal Network and National Very Low Birth Weight Infant Database
    Reichman, Brian
    Klinger, Gil
    Zangen, Shmuel
    Levitzki, Orna
    Lerner-Geva, Liat
    PEDIATRIC MEDICINE, 2023, 6
  • [34] A cohort study of dysmenorrhea and risk of low birth weight
    Feng, Baoying
    Li, Han
    Peng, Yang
    Jiang, Qunjiao
    Wu, Yanan
    Liu, Shun
    Zeng, Xiaoyun
    Qiu, Xiaoqiang
    Huang, Dongping
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2022, 35 (25): : 6442 - 6448
  • [35] Associations between interpregnancy interval and preterm birth by previous preterm birth status in four high-income countries: a cohort study
    Marinovich, M. L.
    Regan, A. K.
    Gissler, M.
    Magnus, M. C.
    Haberg, S. E.
    Mayo, J. A.
    Shaw, G. M.
    Bell, J.
    Nassar, N.
    Ball, S.
    Gebremedhin, A. T.
    Marston, C.
    de Klerk, N.
    Betran, A. P.
    Padula, A. M.
    Pereira, G.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2021, 128 (07) : 1134 - 1143
  • [36] Predictors of low birth weight and preterm birth in rural Uganda: Findings from a birth cohort study
    Bater, Jorick
    Lauer, Jacqueline M.
    Ghosh, Shibani
    Webb, Patrick
    Agaba, Edgar
    Bashaasha, Bernard
    Turyashemererwa, Florence M.
    Shrestha, Robin
    Duggan, Christopher P.
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (07):
  • [37] Birth Weight Ratio as an Alternative to Birth Weight Percentile to Express Infant Weight in Research and Clinical Practice: A Nationwide Cohort Study
    Voskamp, Bart Jan
    Kazemier, Brenda M.
    Schuit, Ewoud
    Mol, Ben Willem J.
    Buimer, Maarten
    Pajkrt, Eva
    Ganzevoort, Wessel
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 2014
  • [39] Association between interpregnancy interval and adverse birth outcomes in women with a previous stillbirth: an international cohort study
    Regan, Annette K.
    Gissler, Mika
    Magnus, Maria C.
    Haberg, Siri E.
    Ball, Stephen
    Malacova, Eva
    Nassar, Natasha
    Leonard, Helen
    Pereira, Gavin
    LANCET, 2019, 393 (10180): : 1527 - 1535
  • [40] Developing a Maternally Linked Birth Dataset to Study the Generational Recurrence of Low Birthweight in Virginia
    Derek A. Chapman
    Gandarvaka Gray
    Maternal and Child Health Journal, 2014, 18 : 488 - 496