Effect of Interpregnancy Interval on Infant Low Birth Weight: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using the Michigan Maternally Linked Birth Database

被引:51
|
作者
Bao-Ping Zhu
Thu Le
机构
[1] National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion,Applied Sciences Branch, Division of Reproductive Health
[2] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,Michigan Department of Community Health
[3] Division of Epidemiology Services,undefined
关键词
low birth weight; birth interval; pregnancy spacing; cohort study;
D O I
10.1023/A:1025184304391
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To examine the relationship between interpregnancy interval and low birth weight (LBW), using the retrospective cohort design. Methods: We used the maternally linked Michigan livebirth data documented between 1989 and 2000 to evaluate LBW in relation to interpregnancy (i.e., delivery-to-conception) interval, overall and at levels of other reproductive risk factors. We fit separate logistic regression models for pairs of first-second, second-third, third-fourth, and fourth-fifth births to control for confounding. Results: Of the 565,911 infants identified, 5.5% had LBW. Univariate and stratified analyses showed that the risk for LBW was lowest when the interpregnancy interval was 18–23 months, and increased with shorter or longer intervals. This J-shaped relationship persisted after controlling for all risk factors simultaneously. For example, among the first-second birth pairs, the adjusted odds ratios (AORs) for LBW associated with interpregnancy intervals <6, 24–59, 60–95, and 96–136 months were 1.4 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.3–1.5), 1.5 (95% CI = 1.3–1.6), 1.1 (95% CI = 1.0–1.1) and 1.5 (95% CI = 1.3–1.8), respectively, compared with an interval of 18–23 months. Among the second-third birth pairs, the AORs were 1.5 (95% CI = 1.3–1.6), 1.3 (95% CI = 1.2–1.4), 1.1 (95% CI = 1.0–1.1), and 1.6 (95% CI = 1.3–2.0), respectively. Among the third-fourth birth pairs, the AORs were 1.2 (95% CI = 1.1–1.4), 1.3 (95% CI = 1.1–1.5), 1.0 (95% CI = 0.9–1.1), and 1.4 (95% CI = 1.0–2.0), respectively. Among the fourth-fifth birth pairs, the AORs were 1.3 (95% CI = 1.1–1.6), 1.2 (95% CI = 0.9–1.5), 1.1 (95% CI = 1.0–1.4), and 1.3 (95% CI = 0.8–2.3), respectively. The population attributable risk associated with interpregnancy intervals shorter than 18 months or longer than 23 months was 9.4%. Conclusion: These data suggest that spacing pregnancies appropriately could be used as a strategy for preventing LBW.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 178
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The joint influence of marital status, interpregnancy interval, and neighborhood on small for gestational age birth: A retrospective cohort study
    Auger N.
    Daniel M.
    Platt R.W.
    Luo Z.-C.
    Wu Y.
    Choinière R.
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 8 (1)
  • [22] Retrospective cohort study of the association between maternal employment precarity and infant low birth weight in women in the USA
    Patil, Divya
    Enquobahrie, Daniel A.
    Peckham, Trevor
    Seixas, Noah
    Hajat, Anjum
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (01):
  • [23] Interpregnancy interval and adverse birth outcomes: a population-based cohort study of twins
    Dhamrait, Gursimran
    O'Donnell, Melissa
    Christian, Hayley
    Taylor, Catherine L.
    Pereira, Gavin
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [24] Interpregnancy interval and adverse birth outcomes: a population-based cohort study of twins
    Gursimran Dhamrait
    Melissa O’Donnell
    Hayley Christian
    Catherine L. Taylor
    Gavin Pereira
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 24
  • [25] Interpregnancy interval and risk of preterm birth and neonatal death: retrospective cohort study (vol 327, pg 313, 2003)
    Smith, GCS
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 327 (7419): : 851 - 851
  • [26] Effect of interpregnancy interval on gestational diabetes: a retrospective matched cohort study
    Gebremedhin, Amanuel T.
    Regan, Annette K.
    Ball, Stephen
    Betran, Ana P.
    Foo, Damien
    Gissler, Mika
    Haberg, Siri E.
    Malacova, Eva
    Marinovich, M. Luke
    Pereira, Gavin
    ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 39 : 33 - 38
  • [27] Effect of interpregnancy interval on infant low birthweight: A longitudinal study.
    Zhu, BP
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2002, 155 (11) : s85 - s85
  • [28] PERIODONTAL THERAPY AND PRETERM BIRTH, LOW BIRTH WEIGHT NOT LINKED, STUDY FINDS
    不详
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 2011, 142 (02): : 133 - 133
  • [29] Non-linear association between interpregnancy interval after vaginal delivery and singleton preterm birth: a retrospective cohort study
    Zhuang, Tingting
    Zhang, Yu
    Ren, Xueli
    Pan, Qixin
    Sun, Jingli
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [30] IMMEDIATE INTUBATION AT BIRTH OF THE VERY-LOW-BIRTH-WEIGHT INFANT - EFFECT ON SURVIVAL
    DREW, JH
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DISEASES OF CHILDREN, 1982, 136 (03): : 207 - 210