Local and Global Error Models to Improve Uncertainty Quantification

被引:0
|
作者
Laureline Josset
Ivan Lunati
机构
[1] University of Lausanne,CRET
来源
Mathematical Geosciences | 2013年 / 45卷
关键词
Multiscale finite volume; Distance kernel method; Stochastic simulation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In groundwater applications, Monte Carlo methods are employed to model the uncertainty on geological parameters. However, their brute-force application becomes computationally prohibitive for highly detailed geological descriptions, complex physical processes, and a large number of realizations. The Distance Kernel Method (DKM) overcomes this issue by clustering the realizations in a multidimensional space based on the flow responses obtained by means of an approximate (computationally cheaper) model; then, the uncertainty is estimated from the exact responses that are computed only for one representative realization per cluster (the medoid). Usually, DKM is employed to decrease the size of the sample of realizations that are considered to estimate the uncertainty. We propose to use the information from the approximate responses for uncertainty quantification. The subset of exact solutions provided by DKM is then employed to construct an error model and correct the potential bias of the approximate model. Two error models are devised that both employ the difference between approximate and exact medoid solutions, but differ in the way medoid errors are interpolated to correct the whole set of realizations. The Local Error Model rests upon the clustering defined by DKM and can be seen as a natural way to account for intra-cluster variability; the Global Error Model employs a linear interpolation of all medoid errors regardless of the cluster to which the single realization belongs. These error models are evaluated for an idealized pollution problem in which the uncertainty of the breakthrough curve needs to be estimated. For this numerical test case, we demonstrate that the error models improve the uncertainty quantification provided by the DKM algorithm and are effective in correcting the bias of the estimate computed solely from the MsFV results. The framework presented here is not specific to the methods considered and can be applied to other combinations of approximate models and techniques to select a subset of realizations.
引用
收藏
页码:601 / 620
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] LOCAL ESTIMATION OF GLOBAL DISCRETIZATION ERROR
    STETTER, HJ
    [J]. SIAM JOURNAL ON NUMERICAL ANALYSIS, 1971, 8 (03) : 512 - &
  • [32] Bayesian uncertainty quantification for anaerobic digestion models
    Picard-Weibel, Antoine
    Capson-Tojo, Gabriel
    Guedj, Benjamin
    Moscoviz, Roman
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 394
  • [33] Uncertainty quantification for monotone stochastic degradation models
    Chen, Piao
    Ye, Zhi-Sheng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF QUALITY TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 50 (02) : 207 - 219
  • [34] Uncertainty quantification of multispecies droplet evaporation models
    Lupo, Giandomenico
    Duwig, Christophe
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER, 2020, 154
  • [35] An uncertainty quantification method for nanomaterial prediction models
    O. Arda Vanli
    Li-Jen Chen
    Chao-his Tsai
    Chuck Zhang
    Ben Wang
    [J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2014, 70 : 33 - 44
  • [36] ONLINE QUANTIFICATION OF INPUT UNCERTAINTY FOR PARAMETRIC MODELS
    Zhou, Enlu
    Liu, Tianyi
    [J]. 2018 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE (WSC), 2018, : 1587 - 1598
  • [37] On the uncertainty quantification of blood flow viscosity models
    Pereira, J. M. C.
    Serra e Moura, J. P.
    Ervilha, A. R.
    Pereira, J. C. F.
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2013, 101 : 253 - 265
  • [38] Uncertainty quantification in continuous fragmentation airburst models
    McMullan, S.
    Collins, G. S.
    [J]. ICARUS, 2019, 327 : 19 - 35
  • [39] Variational inference: uncertainty quantification in additive models
    Lichter, Jens
    Wiemann, Paul F., V
    Kneib, Thomas
    [J]. ASTA-ADVANCES IN STATISTICAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 108 (02) : 279 - 331
  • [40] An uncertainty quantification method for nanomaterial prediction models
    Vanli, O. Arda
    Chen, Li-Jen
    Tsai, Chao-his
    Zhang, Chuck
    Wang, Ben
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 70 (1-4): : 33 - 44