Optimization of Process Parameters for Removal of Arsenic Using Activated Carbon-Based Iron-Containing Adsorbents by Response Surface Methodology

被引:0
|
作者
Aslı Özge Avcı Tuna
Ercan Özdemir
Esra Bilgin Simsek
Ulker Beker
机构
[1] Yildiz Technical University,Chemical Engineering Department
[2] Gebze Institute of Technology,Clean Energy and Nanotechnology Research Center
[3] Yalova University,Chemical and Process Engineering Department
来源
关键词
Activated carbon; Iron (oxy-hydr) oxides; Arsenic; Box–Behnken; Response surface methodology;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this study, arsenate removal by apricot stone-based activated carbon (IAC) modified with iron (oxy-hydr)oxides was carried out. For this purpose, hybrid adsorbents based on Fe2+-loaded activated carbon (IAC–Fe(II)) and Fe3+-loaded activated carbon (IAC–Fe(III)) were synthesized by precipitation method. A three-level, three-factor Box–Behnken experimental design combined with response surface methodology (RSM) was employed to find the optimum combination of process parameters for maximizing the As(V) adsorption capacity of activated carbon-based iron-containing hybrid adsorbent. Three important operation parameters, namely, initial pH of solution (3.0–7.0), temperature (25–65 °C), and initial As(V) concentration (0.5–8.5 mg L−1), were chosen as the independent variables, while the As(V) adsorption capacities of hybrid adsorbents were designated as dependent variables. Lack of fit test showed that the quadratic model provided the best fit to experimental data for both adsorbents with the highest coefficients of determination (R2), adjusted R2, and p-values for lack of fit. The standardized effects of the independent variables and their interactions were tested by analysis of variance and Pareto chart. The model F-values (FIAC–Fe(II)=330.39 and FIAC–Fe(III)=36.19) and R2 values (R2IAC–Fe(II)=0.9977 and R2IAC–Fe(III)=0.9789) of second-order polynomial regression equations indicated the significance of the regression models. Optimum process conditions for As(V) adsorption onto IAC–Fe(II) were 63.68 °C, pH 3.10, and 8.4 mg L−1 initial arsenic concentration, while 25.22 °C, pH 3.07, and 8.28 mg L−1 initial As(V) concentration were found to be optimum conditions for IAC–Fe(III).
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Optimization of adsorption parameters of activated carbon modified with the oxidizing agent on adsorptive removal of toluene using response surface methodology (RSM)
    Khoshakhlagh, Amir Hossein
    Beygzadeh, Mojtaba
    Golbabaei, Farideh
    Carrasco-Marin, Francisco
    Shahtaheri, Seyed Jamaleddin
    JOURNAL OF DISPERSION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 42 (14) : 2101 - 2115
  • [22] Optimization of process parameters for methylene blue removal by jute stick using response surface methodology
    Ghosh, Rakesh Kumar
    Ray, Deb Prasad
    Debnath, Sanjoy
    Tewari, Avisek
    Das, Ipsita
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRESS & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2019, 38 (05)
  • [23] Optimization of process parameters using response surface methodology for the removal of phenol by emulsion liquid membrane
    Balasubramanian, A.
    Venkatesan, S.
    POLISH JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 14 (01) : 46 - 49
  • [24] Optimization of batch process parameters using response surface methodology for dye removal by a novel adsorbent
    Ravikumar, K
    Pakshirajan, K
    Swaminathan, T
    Balu, K
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2005, 105 (03) : 131 - 138
  • [25] Optimization of Process Parameters by Response Surface Methodology for Methylene Blue Removal Using Cellulose Dusts
    Sharifi, Seyed Hassan
    Archin, Saltanat
    Asadpour, Ghasem
    CIVIL ENGINEERING JOURNAL-TEHRAN, 2018, 4 (03): : 620 - 634
  • [26] Optimization of process parameters using response surface methodology: A review
    Chelladurai, Samson Jerold Samuel
    Murugan, K.
    Ray, Abhra Pratip
    Upadhyaya, Makarand
    Narasimharaj, Venugopal
    Gnanasekaran, S.
    MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2021, 37 : 1301 - 1304
  • [27] Optimization of water desalination using carbon-based adsorbents
    Méndez, A
    Gascó, G
    DESALINATION, 2005, 183 (1-3) : 249 - 255
  • [28] Optimization of iron removal in water by nanobubbles using response surface methodology
    Sun, Cuizhen
    Wang, Guoxiu
    Sun, Caijuan
    Liu, Rupeng
    Zhang, Zhibin
    Marhaba, Taha
    Zhang, Wen
    WATER SUPPLY, 2021, 21 (04) : 1608 - 1617
  • [29] Optimization of iron removal in water by nanobubbles using response surface methodology
    Sun C.
    Wang G.
    Sun C.
    Liu R.
    Zhang Z.
    Marhaba T.
    Zhang W.
    Water Science and Technology: Water Supply, 2021, 21 (04): : 1608 - 1617
  • [30] Process Optimization for the Preparation of Activated Carbon from Jatropha Hull Using Response Surface Methodology
    Duan, X.
    Peng, J.
    Srinivasakannan, C.
    Zhang, L.
    Xia, H.
    Yang, K.
    Zhang, Z.
    ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2011, 33 (21) : 2005 - 2017