Evaluation of objective and subjective binocular ocular refraction with looking in type

被引:0
|
作者
Fukushima, Megumi [1 ]
Hirota, Masakazu [2 ,3 ]
Yukimori, Takafumi [4 ]
Hayashi, Akio [4 ]
Hirohara, Yoko [4 ]
Saika, Makoto [4 ]
Matsuoka, Kumiko [2 ]
机构
[1] Teikyo Univ, Grad Sch Med Care & Technol, Div Orthopt, Itabashi Ku, Tokyo 1738605, Japan
[2] Teikyo Univ, Fac Med Technol, Dept Orthopt, 2-11-1 Kaga,Itabashi Ku, Tokyo 1738605, Japan
[3] Teikyo Univ, Sch Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Itabashi Ku, Tokyo, Japan
[4] Topcon Corp, Itabashi Ku, Tokyo, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Ocular refraction; Refractive error; Astigmatism; Autorefractometer; Visual acuity; RESOLUTION;
D O I
10.1186/s12886-024-03449-y
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Background This study aimed to compare the results of the Chronos binocular/monocular refraction system, that measures objective and subjective ocular refraction in one unit, to objective findings obtained from a conventional autorefractometer and a conventional subjective ocular refraction using a trial-frame in real space.Methods Twenty-eight healthy volunteers (21.2 +/- 1.5 years old) were included in this study. Objective ocular refraction was measured using two tests: the Chronos binocular/monocular refraction system under binocular conditions and a conventional autorefractometer under monocular conditions. Subjective ocular refraction was measured using three tests: Chronos binocular/monocular refraction system under binocular, monocular conditions, and trial-frame in the real space under monocular conditions. The measurement distance was set to 5.0 m for each test. All ocular refractions were converted into spherical equivalents (SEs).Results The objective SE was significantly more negative with Chronos binocular/monocular refraction system under binocular condition (- 4.08 +/- 2.76 D) than with the conventional autorefractometer under monocular condition (- 3.85 +/- 2.66 D) (P = 0.002). Although, the subjective SE was significantly more negative with Chronos binocular/monocular refraction system under binocular condition (- 3.55 +/- 2.67 D) than with the trial-frame in the real space under monocular condition (- 3.33 +/- 2.75 D) (P = 0.002), Chronos binocular/monocular refraction system under monocular condition (- 3.17 +/- 2.57 D) was not significantly different from that in trial-frame in real space under monocular condition (P = 0.33).Conclusion These findings suggest that the Chronos binocular/monocular refraction system, which can complete both objective and subjective ocular refraction tests in a single unit, is suitable for screening ocular refraction, although it produces slightly more myopic results. Furthermore, subjective ocular refraction testing accuracy in Chronos binocular/monocular refraction system can be equivalent to trial-frame in real-space testing by switching from binocular to monocular condition.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] OBJECTIVE VS SUBJECTIVE POSTOPERATIVE EVALUATION
    CRIST, T
    SHINGLETON, HM
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1972, 39 (06): : 953 - +
  • [42] OBJECTIVE AND SUBJECTIVE EVALUATION AT GRADE ONE
    ZARUBA, EA
    READING TEACHER, 1968, 22 (01): : 50 - 54
  • [43] OBJECTIVE AND SUBJECTIVE EVALUATION OF INVESTMENT PROJECTS
    PARRAPENA, I
    TRIMESTRE ECONOMICO, 1969, 36 (144): : 595 - 604
  • [44] Impact of religious fasting on ocular dryness: objective and subjective assessment
    Alomari, Amal F.
    Issa, Sara
    Musleh, Asma
    Abusamak, Mohammad
    Bdair, Omar
    Alryalat, Saif Aldeen
    Al-Wakfi, Alanoud
    Jaber, Mohammed
    Alloubani, Ahmad
    Sahawneh, Haitham
    El-Faouri, Muhannd
    Aziz, Ayman Abdul
    Al Bdour, Muawyah
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2025, 12
  • [45] Subjective Comparison Between Ocular Refraction Corrections With Eyeglasses Versus Contact Lenses
    Barbu, Daniela Mariana
    2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-HEALTH AND BIOENGINEERING CONFERENCE (EHB), 2017, : 515 - 518
  • [46] SUBJECTIVE AND OBJECTIVE EVALUATION OF AN OFFICE ENVIRONMENT
    EIDE, I
    BRANDSDAL, E
    MALVIK, B
    ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 1992, 18 (01) : 63 - 72
  • [48] NOCTURNAL SLEEP - SUBJECTIVE AND OBJECTIVE EVALUATION
    STOILOVA, I
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1989, 7 (2-4) : 399 - 400
  • [49] OBJECTIVE AND SUBJECTIVE EVALUATION OF CYCLOVERGENCE AND CYCLOFUSION
    HERZAU, V
    JOOSKRATSCH, E
    DOCUMENTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 1984, 58 (01) : 85 - 90
  • [50] SUBJECTIVE AND OBJECTIVE EVALUATION OF DEEPFAKE VIDEOS
    Korshunov, Pavel
    Marcel, Sebastien
    2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH AND SIGNAL PROCESSING (ICASSP 2021), 2021, : 2510 - 2514