Evaluation of objective and subjective binocular ocular refraction with looking in type

被引:0
|
作者
Fukushima, Megumi [1 ]
Hirota, Masakazu [2 ,3 ]
Yukimori, Takafumi [4 ]
Hayashi, Akio [4 ]
Hirohara, Yoko [4 ]
Saika, Makoto [4 ]
Matsuoka, Kumiko [2 ]
机构
[1] Teikyo Univ, Grad Sch Med Care & Technol, Div Orthopt, Itabashi Ku, Tokyo 1738605, Japan
[2] Teikyo Univ, Fac Med Technol, Dept Orthopt, 2-11-1 Kaga,Itabashi Ku, Tokyo 1738605, Japan
[3] Teikyo Univ, Sch Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Itabashi Ku, Tokyo, Japan
[4] Topcon Corp, Itabashi Ku, Tokyo, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Ocular refraction; Refractive error; Astigmatism; Autorefractometer; Visual acuity; RESOLUTION;
D O I
10.1186/s12886-024-03449-y
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Background This study aimed to compare the results of the Chronos binocular/monocular refraction system, that measures objective and subjective ocular refraction in one unit, to objective findings obtained from a conventional autorefractometer and a conventional subjective ocular refraction using a trial-frame in real space.Methods Twenty-eight healthy volunteers (21.2 +/- 1.5 years old) were included in this study. Objective ocular refraction was measured using two tests: the Chronos binocular/monocular refraction system under binocular conditions and a conventional autorefractometer under monocular conditions. Subjective ocular refraction was measured using three tests: Chronos binocular/monocular refraction system under binocular, monocular conditions, and trial-frame in the real space under monocular conditions. The measurement distance was set to 5.0 m for each test. All ocular refractions were converted into spherical equivalents (SEs).Results The objective SE was significantly more negative with Chronos binocular/monocular refraction system under binocular condition (- 4.08 +/- 2.76 D) than with the conventional autorefractometer under monocular condition (- 3.85 +/- 2.66 D) (P = 0.002). Although, the subjective SE was significantly more negative with Chronos binocular/monocular refraction system under binocular condition (- 3.55 +/- 2.67 D) than with the trial-frame in the real space under monocular condition (- 3.33 +/- 2.75 D) (P = 0.002), Chronos binocular/monocular refraction system under monocular condition (- 3.17 +/- 2.57 D) was not significantly different from that in trial-frame in real space under monocular condition (P = 0.33).Conclusion These findings suggest that the Chronos binocular/monocular refraction system, which can complete both objective and subjective ocular refraction tests in a single unit, is suitable for screening ocular refraction, although it produces slightly more myopic results. Furthermore, subjective ocular refraction testing accuracy in Chronos binocular/monocular refraction system can be equivalent to trial-frame in real-space testing by switching from binocular to monocular condition.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Is an objective refraction optimised using the visual Strehl ratio better than a subjective refraction?
    Hastings, Gareth D.
    Marsack, Jason D.
    Nguyen, Lan Chi
    Cheng, Han
    Applegate, Raymond A.
    OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2017, 37 (03) : 317 - 325
  • [22] Study of subjective refraction values obtained using simultaneous binocular subjective (patient-assisted) autorefractor
    Nishio, K
    Haraguchi, T
    Hayashi, T
    Fukuma, Y
    Goto, I
    Tachikkawa, T
    Matsubara, M
    Negishi, K
    Ohno, K
    Noda, T
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2004, 45 : U998 - U998
  • [23] Subjective refraction determination. Part 3: Binocular adjustment, reading glasses
    Friedburg, D
    Krause, K
    OPHTHALMOLOGE, 2002, 99 (09): : 734 - 742
  • [24] Determination of the Optimum Weighting of Objective Refractions for Predicting Subjective Refraction
    Martin, J.
    Thibos, L. N.
    Bradley, A.
    Vasudevan, B.
    Himebaugh, N. L.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2010, 51 (13)
  • [25] System for Objective Assessment of the Accommodation Response During Subjective Refraction
    Garcia-Guerra, Carlos E.
    Martinez-Roda, Joan A.
    Ondategui-Parra, Juan C.
    Turull-Mallofre, Aina
    Aldaba, Mikel
    Vilaseca, Meritxell
    TRANSLATIONAL VISION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 12 (05):
  • [26] Objective estimates of subjective refraction from wavefront aberration maps
    Coe, CD
    Thibos, LN
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2004, 45 : U999 - U999
  • [27] Evaluation and comparison of subjective and objective anterior ocular surface damage in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and dry eye disease
    Tetiana Zhmud
    Galyna Drozhzhyna
    Nataliia Malachkova
    Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2023, 261 : 447 - 452
  • [28] Evaluation and comparison of subjective and objective anterior ocular surface damage in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and dry eye disease
    Zhmud, Tetiana
    Drozhzhyna, Galyna
    Malachkova, Nataliia
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 261 (02) : 447 - 452
  • [29] Objective evaluation of subjective decisions
    Siegel, M
    Wu, HD
    SCIMA 2003: IEEE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON SOFT COMPUTING TECHNIQUES IN INSTRUMENTATION, MEASUREMENT AND RELATED APPLICATIONS, 2003, : 14 - 18
  • [30] SUBJECTIVE AND OBJECTIVE EVALUATION OF PRINTING
    KUNZ, W
    PAPIER, 1988, 42 (10A): : V67 - V76