Lower bounds on signed edge total domination numbers in graphs

被引:0
|
作者
H. Karami
S. M. Sheikholeslami
Abdollah Khodkar
机构
[1] Azarbaijan University of Tarbiat Moallem,Department of Mathematics
[2] University of West Georgia,Department of Mathematics
来源
关键词
signed edge domination; signed edge total dominating function; signed edge total domination number;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The open neighborhood NG(e) of an edge e in a graph G is the set consisting of all edges having a common end-vertex with e. Let f be a function on E(G), the edge set of G, into the set {−1, 1}. If \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ \sum\limits_{x \in N_G (e)} {f(x) \geqslant 1} $$\end{document} for each e ∈ E(G), then f is called a signed edge total dominating function of G. The minimum of the values \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ \sum\limits_{e \in E(G)} {f(e)} $$\end{document}, taken over all signed edge total dominating function f of G, is called the signed edge total domination number of G and is denoted by γst′(G). Obviously, γst′(G) is defined only for graphs G which have no connected components isomorphic to K2. In this paper we present some lower bounds for γst′(G). In particular, we prove that γst′(T) ⩾ 2 − m/3 for every tree T of size m ⩾ 2. We also classify all trees T with γst′(T).
引用
收藏
页码:595 / 603
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] SIGNED TOTAL ROMAN EDGE DOMINATION IN GRAPHS
    Asgharsharghi, Leila
    Sheikholeslami, Seyed Mahmoud
    [J]. DISCUSSIONES MATHEMATICAE GRAPH THEORY, 2017, 37 (04) : 1039 - 1053
  • [22] Sharp lower bounds on signed domination numbers of digraphs
    Meng, Wei
    Wang, Ruixia
    [J]. ARS COMBINATORIA, 2015, 121 : 281 - 289
  • [23] Lower bounds on nonnegative signed domination parameters in graphs
    Ghameshlou, Arezoo. N.
    [J]. AKCE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GRAPHS AND COMBINATORICS, 2020, 17 (01) : 503 - 509
  • [24] On the lower bounds of partial signed domination number of graphs
    Xing, HM
    Sun, L
    [J]. ARS COMBINATORIA, 2005, 74 : 269 - 273
  • [25] NEW BOUNDS ON THE SIGNED TOTAL DOMINATION NUMBER OF GRAPHS
    Mochaddam, Seyyed Mehdi Hosseini
    Mojdeh, Doost Ali
    Samadi, Babak
    Volkmann, Lutz
    [J]. DISCUSSIONES MATHEMATICAE GRAPH THEORY, 2016, 36 (02) : 467 - 477
  • [26] Signed total Roman domination and domatic numbers in graphs
    Guo, Yubao
    Volkmann, Lutz
    Wang, Yun
    [J]. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2025, 487
  • [27] Signed (total) domination numbers and Laplacian spectrum of graphs
    Ghameshlou, A. N.
    Sheikholeslami, S. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DISCRETE MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES & CRYPTOGRAPHY, 2009, 12 (01): : 93 - 99
  • [28] On the signed total Roman domination and domatic numbers of graphs
    Volkmann, Lutz
    [J]. DISCRETE APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2016, 214 : 179 - 186
  • [29] Twin signed total domination numbers in directed graphs
    Atapour, M.
    Bodaghli, A.
    Sheikholeslami, S. M.
    [J]. ARS COMBINATORIA, 2018, 138 : 119 - 131
  • [30] Bounds of the Signed Edge Domination Number of Complete Multipartite Graphs
    Yancai ZHAO
    [J]. Journal of Mathematical Research with Applications, 2023, 43 (02) : 161 - 165