Modulation Depth Discrimination by Cochlear Implant Users

被引:0
|
作者
Jessica J. M. Monaghan
Robert P. Carlyon
John M. Deeks
机构
[1] Macquarie University,Cambridge Hearing Group, Medical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit
[2] National Acoustic Laboratories,undefined
[3] The Australian Hearing Hub,undefined
[4] University of Cambridge,undefined
关键词
Cochlear implant (CI); Modulation depth discrimination; Amplitude modulation sensitivity; Masking; Temporal processing; Temporal window; Envelope;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Cochlear implants (CIs) convey the amplitude envelope of speech by modulating high-rate pulse trains. However, not all of the envelope may be necessary to perceive amplitude modulations (AMs); the effective envelope depth may be limited by forward and backward masking from the envelope peaks. Three experiments used modulated pulse trains to measure which portions of the envelope can be effectively processed by CI users as a function of AM frequency. Experiment 1 used a three-interval forced-choice task to test the ability of CI users to discriminate less-modulated pulse trains from a fully modulated standard, without controlling for loudness. The stimuli in experiment 2 were identical, but a two-interval task was used in which participants were required to choose the less-modulated interval, ignoring loudness. Catch trials, in which judgements based on level or modulation depth would give opposing answers, were included. Experiment 3 employed novel stimuli whose modulation envelope could be modified below a variable point in the dynamic range, without changing the loudness of the stimulus. Overall, results showed that substantial portions of the envelope are not accurately encoded by CI users. In experiment 1, where loudness cues were available, participants on average were insensitive to changes in the bottom 30% of their dynamic range. In experiment 2, where loudness was controlled, participants appeared insensitive to changes in the bottom 50% of the dynamic range. In experiment 3, participants were insensitive to changes in the bottom 80% of the dynamic range. We discuss potential reasons for this insensitivity and implications for CI speech-processing strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 299
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Enhanced Pitch Discrimination for Cochlear Implant Users with a New Haptic Neuroprosthetic
    Mark D. Fletcher
    Nour Thini
    Samuel W. Perry
    Scientific Reports, 10
  • [32] Factors affecting talker discrimination ability in adult cochlear implant users
    Li, Michael M.
    Moberly, Aaron C.
    Tamati, Terrin N.
    JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS, 2022, 99
  • [33] Auditory Mismatch Negativity In Cochlear Implant Users:A Window To Spectral Discrimination
    Lopez-Valdes, Alejandro
    Mc Laughlin, Myles
    Viani, Laura
    Walshe, Peter
    Smith, Jaclyn
    Zeng, Fang-Gang
    Reilly, Richard B.
    2013 35TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC), 2013, : 3555 - 3558
  • [34] Discrimination and sensorimotor adaptation of self-produced vowels in cochlear implant users
    Borjigin, Agudemu
    Bakst, Sarah
    Anderson, Katla
    Litovsky, Ruth Y.
    Niziolek, Caroline A.
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2024, 155 (03): : 1895 - 1908
  • [35] Voice Discrimination in Quiet and in Background Noise by Simulated and Real Cochlear Implant Users
    Levin, Michal
    Zaltz, Yael
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2023, 66 (12): : 5169 - 5186
  • [36] The effect of perimodiolar placement on speech perception and frequency discrimination by cochlear implant users
    Fitzgerald, Matthew B.
    Shapiro, William H.
    McDonald, Paulette D.
    Neuburger, Heidi S.
    Ashburn-Reed, Sara
    Immerman, Sara
    Jethanamest, Daniel
    Roland, J. Thomas
    Svirsky, Mario A.
    ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2007, 127 (04) : 378 - 383
  • [37] Development of electrophysiological and behavioural measures of electrode discrimination in adult cochlear implant users
    Mathew, Rajeev
    Vickers, Deborah
    Boyle, Patrick
    Shaida, Azhar
    Selvadurai, David
    Jiang, Dan
    Undurraga, Jaime
    HEARING RESEARCH, 2018, 367 : 74 - 87
  • [38] Discrimination of Rippled-Spectrum Signals by Prelingual and Postlingual Cochlear Implant Users
    Nechaev D.I.
    Goykhburg M.V.
    Supin A.Y.
    Bakhshinyan V.V.
    Tavartkiladze G.A.
    Human Physiology, 2020, 46 (2) : 119 - 126
  • [39] The Relationship of Pitch Discrimination with Segregation of Tonal and Speech Streams for Cochlear Implant Users
    Camarena, Andres
    Ardis, Matthew
    Fujioka, Takako
    Fitzgerald, Matthew B.
    Goldsworthy, Raymond L.
    TRENDS IN HEARING, 2024, 28
  • [40] Rate discrimination, gap detection and ranking of temporal pitch in cochlear implant users
    Cosentino, Stefano
    Carlyon, Robert P.
    Deeks, John M.
    Parkinson, Wendy
    Bierer, Julie A.
    JARO-JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2016, 17 (04): : 371 - 382