Modulation Depth Discrimination by Cochlear Implant Users

被引:0
|
作者
Jessica J. M. Monaghan
Robert P. Carlyon
John M. Deeks
机构
[1] Macquarie University,Cambridge Hearing Group, Medical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit
[2] National Acoustic Laboratories,undefined
[3] The Australian Hearing Hub,undefined
[4] University of Cambridge,undefined
关键词
Cochlear implant (CI); Modulation depth discrimination; Amplitude modulation sensitivity; Masking; Temporal processing; Temporal window; Envelope;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Cochlear implants (CIs) convey the amplitude envelope of speech by modulating high-rate pulse trains. However, not all of the envelope may be necessary to perceive amplitude modulations (AMs); the effective envelope depth may be limited by forward and backward masking from the envelope peaks. Three experiments used modulated pulse trains to measure which portions of the envelope can be effectively processed by CI users as a function of AM frequency. Experiment 1 used a three-interval forced-choice task to test the ability of CI users to discriminate less-modulated pulse trains from a fully modulated standard, without controlling for loudness. The stimuli in experiment 2 were identical, but a two-interval task was used in which participants were required to choose the less-modulated interval, ignoring loudness. Catch trials, in which judgements based on level or modulation depth would give opposing answers, were included. Experiment 3 employed novel stimuli whose modulation envelope could be modified below a variable point in the dynamic range, without changing the loudness of the stimulus. Overall, results showed that substantial portions of the envelope are not accurately encoded by CI users. In experiment 1, where loudness cues were available, participants on average were insensitive to changes in the bottom 30% of their dynamic range. In experiment 2, where loudness was controlled, participants appeared insensitive to changes in the bottom 50% of the dynamic range. In experiment 3, participants were insensitive to changes in the bottom 80% of the dynamic range. We discuss potential reasons for this insensitivity and implications for CI speech-processing strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 299
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Modulation Depth Discrimination by Cochlear Implant Users
    Monaghan, Jessica J. M.
    Carlyon, Robert P.
    Deeks, John M.
    JARO-JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2022, 23 (02): : 285 - 299
  • [2] Discrimination of Stochastic Frequency Modulation by Cochlear Implant Users
    Sheft, Stanley
    Cheng, Min-Yu
    Shafiro, Valeriy
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY, 2015, 26 (06) : 572 - 581
  • [3] Electrophysiological and psychophysical measures of amplitude modulation discrimination in cochlear implant users
    Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
    不详
    不详
    Proc. Int. Congr. Acoust., (2220-2226):
  • [4] Modulation frequency discrimination with single and multiple channels in cochlear implant users
    Galvin, John J., III
    Oba, Sandy
    Baskent, Deniz
    Fu, Qian-Jie
    HEARING RESEARCH, 2015, 324 : 7 - 18
  • [5] Speaker discrimination in cochlear implant users
    Muehler, R.
    Ziese, M.
    Verhey, J. L.
    HNO, 2017, 65 (03) : 243 - 249
  • [6] Speech discrimination in elderly cochlear implant users
    Nakajima, S
    Iwaki, S
    Fujisawa, N
    Yamaguchi, S
    Kawano, M
    Fujiki, N
    Naito, Y
    Honjo, I
    UPDATES IN COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION, 2000, 57 : 368 - 369
  • [7] Speech discrimination by telephone in cochlear implant users
    Castro, A
    Lassaletta, L
    Bastarrica, M
    de Sarriá, MJ
    Gavilán, J
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH EUROPEAN CONGRESS OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2004, : 153 - 158
  • [8] Musical Pitch Discrimination by Cochlear Implant Users
    Ping, Lichuan
    Yuan, Meng
    Feng, Haihong
    ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 2012, 121 (05): : 328 - 336
  • [9] Reduced visual discrimination in cochlear implant users
    Turgeon, Christine
    Champoux, Francois
    Lepore, Franco
    Ellemberg, Dave
    NEUROREPORT, 2012, 23 (06) : 385 - 389
  • [10] Sprecherunterscheidung mit CochleaimplantatenSpeaker discrimination in cochlear implant users
    R. Mühler
    M. Ziese
    J. L. Verhey
    HNO, 2017, 65 (3) : 243 - 250