Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial

被引:0
|
作者
Sebiha Özkan
Eray Çalışkan
Emek Doğer
İzzet Yücesoy
Semih Özeren
Birol Vural
机构
[1] Kocaeli University,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine
来源
关键词
Misoprostol; Dinoprostone; Labor induction;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 24
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The efficacy of misoprostol vaginal insert compared with oral misoprostol in the induction of labor of nulliparous women: A randomized national multicenter trial
    Hokkila, Emma
    Kruit, Heidi
    Rahkonen, Leena
    Timonen, Susanna
    Mattila, Mirjami
    Laatio, Liisa
    Orden, Maija-Riitta
    Uotila, Jukka
    Luukkaala, Tiina
    Tihtonen, Kati
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2019, 98 (08) : 1032 - 1039
  • [32] Vaginal misoprostol versus vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: Individual participant data meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Patabendige, Malitha
    Chan, Fei
    Vayssiere, Christophe
    Ehlinger, Virginie
    van Gemund, Nicolette
    Le Cessie, Saskia
    Prager, Martina
    Marions, Lena
    Rozenberg, Patrick
    Chevret, Sylvie
    Young, David
    Le Roux, Paul A.
    Gregson, Sarah
    Waterstone, Mark
    Rolnik, Daniel L.
    Mol, Ben Willem W.
    Li, Wentao
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 230 (01) : S430 - S431
  • [33] Comparison of vaginal misoprostol and oral misoprostol with intracervical dinoprostone gel for labor induction at term
    Sheela, C. N.
    Mhaskar, Arun
    George, Shirley
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY OF INDIA, 2007, 57 (04): : 327 - 330
  • [34] A randomized controlled trial comparing low dose vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone gel for labor induction
    Girija S.
    Manjunath A.P.
    The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 2011, 61 (2) : 153 - 160
  • [35] A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Low Dose Vaginal Misoprostol and Dinoprostone Gel for Labor Induction
    Shivarudraiah, Girija
    Palaksha, Manjunath Attibele
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY OF INDIA, 2011, 61 (02): : 153 - 160
  • [36] Vaginal dinoprostone versus Foley catheter for induction of labor: a randomized controlled trial
    Liu, Xiaohua
    Huang, Ding
    Liu, Yang
    Qu, Cuicui
    Mo, Huiqin
    Zhao, Xin
    Li, Wentao
    Mol, Ben Willem W.
    Shen, Hong
    Cheng, Weiwei
    Ying, Hao
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 230 (01) : S59 - S60
  • [37] Randomized clinical trial between hourly titrated oral misoprostol and vaginal dinoprostone for induction of labor
    Rouzi, Abdulrahim A.
    Alsibiani, Sharifa
    Mansouri, Nisma
    Alsinani, Nawal
    Darhouse, Khalid
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 210 (01)
  • [38] Comparative study of titrated oral misoprostol solution and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term pregnancy
    Xiu Wang
    Aijun Yang
    Qingyong Ma
    Xuelan Li
    Li Qin
    Tongqiang He
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2016, 294 : 495 - 503
  • [39] Comparative study of titrated oral misoprostol solution and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term pregnancy
    Wang, Xiu
    Yang, Aijun
    Ma, Qingyong
    Li, Xuelan
    Qin, Li
    He, Tongqiang
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2016, 294 (03) : 495 - 503
  • [40] Dinoprostone vaginal insert (DVI) versus adjunctive sweeping of membranes and DVI for term induction of labor
    Bhatia, Anju
    Teo, Puay Ling
    Li, Mingyue
    Lee, Jia Ying Beatrice
    Chan, Mei Xin Joanne
    Yeo, Tai Wai
    Mathur, Manisha
    Tagore, Shephali
    Yeo, George S. H.
    Arulkumaran, Sabaratnam
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2021, 47 (09) : 3171 - 3178