Auditory cues for orientation and postural control in sighted and congenitally blind people

被引:0
|
作者
R. D. Easton
Anthony J. Greene
Paul DiZio
James R. Lackner
机构
[1] Boston College,
[2] Department of Psychology,undefined
[3] Chestnut Hill,undefined
[4] MA 02167,undefined
[5] USA Fax: +1-617 552-0523,undefined
[6] e-mail: Randolph.Easton@bc.edu,undefined
[7] Brandeis University,undefined
[8] Waltham,undefined
[9] MA 02154,undefined
[10] USA,undefined
来源
关键词
Key words Balance; Auditory information; Vision; Blindness; Human;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study assessed whether stationary auditory information could affect body and head sway (as does visual and haptic information) in sighted and congenitally blind people. Two speakers, one placed adjacent to each ear, significantly stabilized center-of-foot-pressure sway in a tandem Romberg stance, while neither a single speaker in front of subjects nor a head-mounted sonar device reduced center-of-pressure sway. Center-of-pressure sway was reduced to the same level in the two-speaker condition for sighted and blind subjects. Both groups also evidenced reduced head sway in the two-speaker condition, although blind subjects’ head sway was significantly larger than that of sighted subjects. The advantage of the two-speaker condition was probably attributable to the nature of distance compared with directional auditory information. The results rule out a deficit model of spatial hearing in blind people and are consistent with one version of a compensation model. Analysis of maximum cross-correlations between center-of-pressure and head sway, and associated time lags suggest that blind and sighted people may use different sensorimotor strategies to achieve stability.
引用
收藏
页码:541 / 550
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Shorter latencies of components of middle latency auditory evoked potentials in congenitally blind compared to normal sighted subjects
    Manjunath, NK
    Srinivas, R
    Nirmala, KS
    Nagendra, HR
    Kumar, A
    Telles, S
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 1998, 95 (3-4) : 173 - 181
  • [22] Multivoxel Pattern Analysis Reveals Auditory Motion Information in MT plus of Both Congenitally Blind and Sighted Individuals
    Strnad, Lukas
    Peelen, Marius V.
    Bedny, Marina
    Caramazza, Alfonso
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (04):
  • [23] Lack of Visual Experience Affects Multimodal Language Production: Evidence From Congenitally Blind and Sighted People
    Mamus, Ezgi
    Speed, Laura J.
    Rissman, Lilia
    Majid, Asifa
    Ozyurek, Asli
    [J]. COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2023, 47 (01)
  • [24] Rapid processing of haptic cues for postural control in blind subjects
    Schieppati, Marco
    Schmid, Monica
    Sozzi, Stefania
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2014, 125 (07) : 1427 - 1439
  • [25] Spatial scaling in congenitally blind and sighted individuals: similarities and differences
    Szubielska, Magdalena
    Mohring, Wenke
    Szewczyk, Marta
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 31 (04) : 476 - 486
  • [26] TACTUAL PICTURE-RECOGNITION IN CONGENITALLY BLIND AND SIGHTED CHILDREN
    PATHAK, K
    PRING, L
    [J]. APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 3 (04) : 337 - 350
  • [27] COGNITIVE MODELS FOR SPATIAL REPRESENTATIONS IN CONGENITALLY BLIND, ADVENTITIOUSLY BLIND, AND SIGHTED SUBJECTS
    ROSENCRANZ, D
    SUSLICK, R
    [J]. NEW OUTLOOK FOR THE BLIND, 1976, 70 (05): : 188 - 194
  • [28] Correlates of contrastive focus in congenitally blind adults and sighted adults
    Menard, Lucie
    Leclerc, Annie
    Tiede, Mark
    Premont, Amelie
    Turgeon, Christine
    Trudeau-Fisette, Pamela
    Cote, Dominique
    [J]. 14TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL SPEECH COMMUNICATION ASSOCIATION (INTERSPEECH 2013), VOLS 1-5, 2013, : 3509 - 3513
  • [29] AN ANALYSIS OF SPACE-PERCEPTION IN CONGENITALLY BLIND AND IN SIGHTED INDIVIDUALS
    HUNTER, WF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1964, 70 (02): : 325 - 329
  • [30] VERBAL AND SPATIAL INTERFERENCE EFFECTS IN CONGENITALLY BLIND AND SIGHTED SUBJECTS
    HAMPSON, PJ
    DUFFY, C
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE, 1984, 38 (03): : 411 - 420