Field performance of a low-cost sensor in the monitoring of particulate matter in Santiago, Chile

被引:0
|
作者
Matías Tagle
Francisca Rojas
Felipe Reyes
Yeanice Vásquez
Fredrik Hallgren
Jenny Lindén
Dimitar Kolev
Ågot K. Watne
Pedro Oyola
机构
[1] Antonio Bellet 292,Centro Mario Molina Chile
[2] Aschebergsgatan 44,IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute
[3] RISE Acreo,undefined
[4] Research Institutes of Sweden,undefined
[5] Environment Administration,undefined
[6] City of Gothenburg,undefined
来源
关键词
Citizen science; Reproducibility; Relative humidity; SDS011;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Integration of low-cost air quality sensors with the internet of things (IoT) has become a feasible approach towards the development of smart cities. Several studies have assessed the performance of low-cost air quality sensors by comparing their measurements with reference instruments. We examined the performance of a low-cost IoT particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) sensor in the urban environment of Santiago, Chile. The prototype was assembled from a PM10–PM2.5 sensor (SDS011), a temperature and relative humidity sensor (BME280) and an IoT board (ESP8266/Node MCU). Field tests were conducted at three regulatory monitoring stations during the 2018 austral winter and spring seasons. The sensors at each site were operated in parallel with continuous reference air quality monitors (BAM 1020 and TEOM 1400) and a filter-based sampler (Partisol 2000i). Variability between sensor units (n = 7) and the correlation between the sensor and reference instruments were examined. Moderate inter-unit variability was observed between sensors for PM2.5 (normalized root-mean-square error 9–24%) and PM10 (10–37%). The correlations between the 1-h average concentrations reported by the sensors and continuous monitors were higher for PM2.5 (R2 0.47–0.86) than PM10 (0.24–0.56). The correlations (R2) between the 24-h PM2.5 averages from the sensors and reference instruments were 0.63–0.87 for continuous monitoring and 0.69–0.93 for filter-based samplers. Correlation analysis revealed that sensors tended to overestimate PM concentrations in high relative humidity (RH > 75%) and underestimate when RH was below 50%. Overall, the prototype evaluated exhibited adequate performance and may be potentially suitable for monitoring daily PM2.5 averages after correcting for RH.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Field performance of a low-cost sensor in the monitoring of particulate matter in Santiago, Chile
    Tagle, Matias
    Rojas, Francisca
    Reyes, Felipe
    Vasquez, Yeanice
    Hallgren, Fredrik
    Linden, Jenny
    Kolev, Dimitar
    Watne, Agot K.
    Oyola, Pedro
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2020, 192 (03)
  • [2] Field and Laboratory Evaluations of the Low-Cost Plantower Particulate Matter Sensor
    Zamora, Misti Levy
    Xiong, Fulizi
    Gentner, Drew
    Kerkez, Branko
    Kohrman-Glaser, Joseph
    Koehler, Kirsten
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 53 (02) : 838 - 849
  • [3] Low-Cost Sensor Node for Air Quality Monitoring: Field Tests and Validation of Particulate Matter Measurements
    Schilt, Ueli
    Barahona, Braulio
    Buck, Roger
    Meyer, Patrick
    Kappani, Prince
    Mockli, Yannis
    Meyer, Markus
    Schuetz, Philipp
    [J]. SENSORS, 2023, 23 (02)
  • [4] Effect of environmental conditions on the performance of a low-cost atmospheric particulate matter sensor
    Macias-Hernandez, Barbara A.
    Tello-Leal, Edgar
    Barrios, S. Oliver
    Leiva-Guzman, Manuel A.
    Toro, A. Richard
    [J]. URBAN CLIMATE, 2023, 52
  • [5] Designing a low-cost wireless sensor network for particulate matter monitoring: Implementation, calibration, and field-test
    Zafra-Perez, A.
    Medina-Garcia, J.
    Boente, C.
    Gomez-Galan, J. A.
    de la Campa, A. Sanchez
    de la Rosa, J. D.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2024, 15 (09)
  • [6] Performance Evaluation of Low-cost Particulate Matter Sensors
    Marinov, Marin B.
    Hensel, Stefan
    Ganev, Borislav
    Nikolov, Georgi
    [J]. 2017 XXVI INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE ELECTRONICS (ET), 2017,
  • [7] Ambient and laboratory evaluation of a low-cost particulate matter sensor
    Kelly, K. E.
    Whitaker, J.
    Petty, A.
    Widmer, C.
    Dybwad, A.
    Sleeth, D.
    Martin, R.
    Butterfield, A.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2017, 221 : 491 - 500
  • [8] Preliminary research for low-cost particulate matter sensor network
    Bathory, Csongor
    Kiss, Marton L.
    Trohak, Attila
    Dobo, Zsolt
    Palotas, Arpad Bence
    [J]. 11TH CONFERENCE ON INTERDISCIPLINARY PROBLEMS IN ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND ENGINEERING (EKO-DOK 2019), 2019, 100
  • [9] Field Evaluation of Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors in Beijing
    Mei, Han
    Han, Pengfei
    Wang, Yinan
    Zeng, Ning
    Liu, Di
    Cai, Qixiang
    Deng, Zhaoze
    Wang, Yinghong
    Pan, Yuepeng
    Tang, Xiao
    [J]. SENSORS, 2020, 20 (16) : 1 - 17
  • [10] Calibration of low-cost particulate matter sensors for coal dust monitoring
    Amoah, Nana A.
    Xu, Guang
    Kumar, Ashish Ranjan
    Wang, Yang
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 859