Factors affecting success in the treatment of proximal ureteral stones larger than 1 cm with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in adult patients

被引:0
|
作者
Yavuz Guler
Akif Erbin
Alper Kafkasli
Gokhun Ozmerdiven
机构
[1] Private Safa Hospital,Department of Urology
[2] Haseki Traning and Research Hospital,Department of Urology
[3] Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Traning and Research Hospital,Department of Urology
[4] Istanbul Aydin University Medical Faculty,Department of Urology
来源
Urolithiasis | 2021年 / 49卷
关键词
Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy; Hounsfield Unit; Proximal ureter diameter; Ureteral wall thickness;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of the study was to analyze the factors predicting success for the treatment of proximal ureteral stones larger than 1 cm with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) in adult patients. Between January 2014 and December 2018, 480 adult patients in total underwent SWL and data were retrospectively evaluated. Patients with multiple ureteral stones, solitary kidney, congenital abnormality, skeletal system abnormality, history of previous urinary system surgery and SWL, renal insufficiency, patients who could not tolerate SWL and pediatric patients were excluded from the study. The remaining 415 patients were divided into two groups as success (Group 1, n = 307) and failure (Group 2, n = 108). The overall success rate was 73.9%. The values of stone size, Hounsfield Unit (HU), skin to stone distance (SSD), ureteral wall thickness (UWT), proximal ureter diameter, renal pelvis diameter, hydronephrosis grade, and duration of renal colic were significantly higher in Group 2 compared to Group 1. In binary logistic regression analyses, HU, UWT, and proximal ureter diameter were found to be independent predictors. HU, UWT, and proximal ureter diameter had sensitivity and specificity of 92–92%, 88–23%, and 87–46%, with cutoff values of 740 HU, 2.5 mm and 8.5 mm, respectively. The area under the curve values were 0.96, 0.97, and 0.96 for HU, UWT, and proximal ureter diameter, respectively. The CT-based parameters, including HU, UWT, and proximal ureter diameter are independent predictive factors with excellent accuracy for the treatment of proximal ureteral stones larger than 1 cm with SWL in adult patients. Based on these factors, SWL can be considered for proximal ureteral stones larger than 1 cm.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 56
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparative analysis of ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of childhood proximal ureteral stones
    Emrullah Durmus
    Fesih Ok
    Pediatric Surgery International, 39
  • [42] Comparative analysis of ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of childhood proximal ureteral stones
    Durmus, Emrullah
    Fesih, Ok
    PEDIATRIC SURGERY INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 39 (01)
  • [43] The efficacy of early extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for the treatment of 5 to 10 mm upper ureteral stones: An observational study
    Aydamirov, Mubariz
    Karkin, Kadir
    Altunkol, Adem
    Vuruskan, Ediz
    Kaplan, Eyup
    Gurlen, Guclu
    Aksay, Bugra
    Akgun, Omer Faruk
    Gozukara, Keremhan
    Ortaoglu, Ferhat
    Tunckiran, Muslum Ahmet
    MEDICINE, 2024, 103 (30)
  • [44] The efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for symptomatic ureteral stones: Predictors of treatment failure without the assistance of computed tomography
    Chiang, Bing-Juin
    Liao, Chun-Hou
    Lin, Yu-Hua
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (09):
  • [45] Comparing the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of proximal ureteral stones in children: A retrospective study
    Bagci, Uygar
    Dinckal, Mustafa
    Tekin, Ali
    Kizilay, Fuat
    Nazli, Oktay
    Ulman, Ibrahim
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 30 (11) : 985 - 990
  • [46] Stone clearance after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in patients with solitary pure calcium oxalate stones smaller than 1.0 cm in the proximal ureter, with special reference to monohydrate and dihydrate content
    Ichiyanagi, Osamu
    Nagaoka, Akira
    Izumi, Takuji
    Kawamura, Yuko
    Tsukigi, Masaaki
    Ishii, Tatsuya
    Ohji, Hiroshi
    Kato, Tomoyuki
    Tomita, Yoshihiko
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 47 (02) : 131 - 139
  • [47] Can intervals in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy sessions affect success in the treatment of upper ureteral stones?
    Turan, Turgay
    Efioglu, Ozgur
    Danacioglu, Yavuz Onur
    Sendogan, Furkan
    Culpan, Meftun
    Gunaydin, Bilal
    Atis, Ramazan Gokhan
    Caskurlu, Turhan
    Yildirim, Asif
    VIDEOSURGERY AND OTHER MINIINVASIVE TECHNIQUES, 2018, 13 (04) : 507 - 511
  • [48] THE FEASIBILITY OF SHOCKWAVE LITHOTRIPSY FOR THE TREATMENT OF OVER 1CM SIZED, LOWER CALYCEAL STONES
    Oh, Jin Kyu
    Chang, JooHyun
    Lee, SangChul
    Kim, Tae Beom
    Kim, Khae Hawn
    Jung, Han
    Yoon, Sang Jin
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2011, 25 : A252 - A252
  • [49] Prognostic Factors of Success of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) in the Treatment of Renal Stones
    Abdulla Al-Ansari
    Khalid As-Sadiq
    Sami Al-Said
    Nagy Younis
    Osama A. Jaleel
    Ahmed A. Shokeir
    International Urology and Nephrology, 2006, 38 : 63 - 67
  • [50] Prognostic factors of success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in the treatment of renal stones
    Al-Ansari, Abdulla
    As-Sadiq, Khalid
    Al-Said, Sami
    Younis, Nagy
    Jaleel, Osama A.
    Shokeir, Ahmed A.
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2006, 38 (01) : 63 - 67