Factors affecting success in the treatment of proximal ureteral stones larger than 1 cm with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in adult patients

被引:0
|
作者
Yavuz Guler
Akif Erbin
Alper Kafkasli
Gokhun Ozmerdiven
机构
[1] Private Safa Hospital,Department of Urology
[2] Haseki Traning and Research Hospital,Department of Urology
[3] Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Traning and Research Hospital,Department of Urology
[4] Istanbul Aydin University Medical Faculty,Department of Urology
来源
Urolithiasis | 2021年 / 49卷
关键词
Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy; Hounsfield Unit; Proximal ureter diameter; Ureteral wall thickness;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of the study was to analyze the factors predicting success for the treatment of proximal ureteral stones larger than 1 cm with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) in adult patients. Between January 2014 and December 2018, 480 adult patients in total underwent SWL and data were retrospectively evaluated. Patients with multiple ureteral stones, solitary kidney, congenital abnormality, skeletal system abnormality, history of previous urinary system surgery and SWL, renal insufficiency, patients who could not tolerate SWL and pediatric patients were excluded from the study. The remaining 415 patients were divided into two groups as success (Group 1, n = 307) and failure (Group 2, n = 108). The overall success rate was 73.9%. The values of stone size, Hounsfield Unit (HU), skin to stone distance (SSD), ureteral wall thickness (UWT), proximal ureter diameter, renal pelvis diameter, hydronephrosis grade, and duration of renal colic were significantly higher in Group 2 compared to Group 1. In binary logistic regression analyses, HU, UWT, and proximal ureter diameter were found to be independent predictors. HU, UWT, and proximal ureter diameter had sensitivity and specificity of 92–92%, 88–23%, and 87–46%, with cutoff values of 740 HU, 2.5 mm and 8.5 mm, respectively. The area under the curve values were 0.96, 0.97, and 0.96 for HU, UWT, and proximal ureter diameter, respectively. The CT-based parameters, including HU, UWT, and proximal ureter diameter are independent predictive factors with excellent accuracy for the treatment of proximal ureteral stones larger than 1 cm with SWL in adult patients. Based on these factors, SWL can be considered for proximal ureteral stones larger than 1 cm.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:51 / 56
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Factors influencing the efficacy of ultrasound-guided extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in the treatment of ureteral stones: a retrospective study
    Liang, Junjie
    Xie, Linguo
    Gao, Hongwei
    Yang, Rui
    Liu, Jinling
    Liu, Chunyu
    UROLITHIASIS, 2023, 52 (01)
  • [22] Upper ureteral stones larger than 1cm treatment using with TUL
    不详
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2004, 18 : A162 - A162
  • [23] Erratum to: Is routine ureteral stenting necessary after uncomplicated ureteroscopic lithotripsy for lower ureteral stones larger than 1 cm?
    Kenan Isen
    Salih Boğatekin
    Suat Em
    Huseyin Ergin
    Vehbi Kiliç
    Urological Research, 2008, 36 (2): : 121 - 121
  • [24] Does morbid obesity influence the success and complication rates of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for upper ureteral stones?
    Dede, Onur
    Sener, Nevzat Can
    Bas, Okan
    Dede, Gulay
    Bagbanci, Muhammet Sahin
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 41 (01): : 20 - 23
  • [25] Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for solitary distal ureteral stones: Does the degree of urinary obstruction affect success?
    Demirbas, M
    Kose, AC
    Samli, M
    Guler, C
    Kara, T
    Karalar, M
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2004, 18 (03) : 237 - 240
  • [26] Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of proximal ureteral stones: Does the presence and degree of hydronephrosis affect success?
    Seitz, C
    Fajkovic, H
    Waldert, M
    Tanovic, E
    Remzi, M
    Kramer, G
    Marberger, M
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2006, 49 (02) : 378 - 383
  • [27] Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for the Treatment of Ureteral Stones : a Critique on Success Rate
    Barzegarnezhad, Ayoub
    Kerigh, Behzad Feizzadeh
    Azizi, Fariborz
    AMBIENT SCIENCE, 2016, 3
  • [28] Complementary Ureterorenoscopy after extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in proximal ureteral stones: success and complications
    Demirelli, Erhan
    Ogreden, Ercan
    Tok, Dogan Sabri
    Demiray, Ozay
    Karadayi, Mehmet
    Oguz, Ural
    REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2022, 68 (08): : 1068 - 1072
  • [29] Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy for Ureteral Stones Twelve Years of Experience with 2836 Patients at a Single Center
    Demirbas, Murat
    Samli, Murat
    Karalar, Mustafa
    Kose, Ahmet C.
    UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2012, 9 (03) : 557 - 561
  • [30] Ureteral wall thickness is an independent parameter affecting the success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy treatment in ureteral stones above the iliac crest
    Bulbul, Emre
    Ilki, Fahri Yavuz
    Gultekin, Mehmet Hamza
    Erozenci, Ahmet
    Tutar, Onur
    Citgez, Sinharib
    Tansu, Nejat
    Onal, Bulent
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2021, 75 (07)