Sex differences and the effect of instruction on reorientation abilities by humans

被引:0
|
作者
Megan N. Siemens
Debbie M. Kelly
机构
[1] University of Manitoba,Department of Psychology
[2] University of Saskatchewan,Department of Psychology
来源
Memory & Cognition | 2018年 / 46卷
关键词
Human; Reorientation; Feature; Geometry; Sex differences; Task instructions;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study examined whether differences in the amount of information provided to men and women, in the form of verbal instruction, influenced their encoding during a reorientation task. When a navigator needs to orient, featural (e.g., colour or texture) and geometry (e.g., metric information) are used to determine which direction to begin traveling. The current study used a spatial reorientation task to examine how men and women use featural and geometric cues and whether the content of the task’s instructions influenced how these cues were used. Participants were trained to find a target location in a rectangular room with distinctive objects situated at each corner. Once the participants were accurately locating the target, various tests manipulating the spatial information were conducted. We found both men and women encoded the featural cues, and even though the features provided reliable information, participants generally showed an encoding of geometry. However, when participants were not provided with any information about the spatial aspects of the task in the instructions, they failed to encode geometry. We also found that women used distant featural cues as landmarks when the featural cue closest to the target was removed, whereas men did not. Yet, when the two types of cues were placed in conflict, both sexes weighed featural cues more heavily than geometric cues. The content of the task instructions also influenced how cues were relied upon in this conflict situation. Our results have important implications for our understanding of how spatial cues are used for reorientation.
引用
收藏
页码:566 / 576
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] SEX DIFFERENCES, TARGET ARRANGEMENT AND PRIMARY MENTAL ABILITIES
    FREEMAN, JA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PARAPSYCHOLOGY, 1967, 31 (04) : 275 - 279
  • [32] Sex Differences in Behavior and Learning Abilities in Adult Rats
    Pupikina, Maria
    Sitnikova, Evgenia
    [J]. LIFE-BASEL, 2023, 13 (02):
  • [33] ROLES OF ACTIVATION AND INHIBITION IN SEX DIFFERENCES IN COGNITIVE ABILITIES
    BROVERMAN, DM
    KLAIBER, EL
    KOBAYASHI, Y
    VOGEL, W
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1968, 75 (01) : 23 - +
  • [34] PATTERNS OF MENTAL ABILITIES - ETHNIC SOCIOECONOMIC, AND SEX DIFFERENCES
    BACKMAN, ME
    [J]. AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 1972, 9 (01) : 1 - 12
  • [35] SPATIAL ABILITIES, SEX-DIFFERENCES AND EEG FUNCTIONING
    RAY, WJ
    NEWCOMBE, N
    SEMON, J
    COLE, PM
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1981, 19 (05) : 719 - 722
  • [36] A STUDY OF SEX DIFFERENCES ON THE PRIMARY MENTAL ABILITIES TEST
    Herzberg, Frederick
    Lepkin, Milton
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1954, 14 (04) : 687 - 689
  • [37] Do sex differences in construction behavior relate to differences in physical cognitive abilities?
    Lambert, Connor T.
    Balasubramanian, Gopika
    Camacho-Alpizar, Andres
    Guillette, Lauren M.
    [J]. ANIMAL COGNITION, 2022, 25 (03) : 605 - 615
  • [38] LEARNING WHATS TAUGHT - SEX-DIFFERENCES IN INSTRUCTION
    LEINHARDT, G
    SEEWALD, AM
    ENGEL, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1979, 71 (04) : 432 - 439
  • [39] Do sex differences in construction behavior relate to differences in physical cognitive abilities?
    Connor T. Lambert
    Gopika Balasubramanian
    Andrés Camacho-Alpízar
    Lauren M. Guillette
    [J]. Animal Cognition, 2022, 25 : 605 - 615
  • [40] Evaluation of sex differences in the pharmacokinetics of ranitidine in humans
    AbadSantos, F
    Carcas, AJ
    Guerra, P
    Govantes, C
    Montuenga, C
    Gomez, E
    Fernandez, A
    Frias, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1996, 36 (08): : 748 - 751