Sex differences and the effect of instruction on reorientation abilities by humans

被引:0
|
作者
Megan N. Siemens
Debbie M. Kelly
机构
[1] University of Manitoba,Department of Psychology
[2] University of Saskatchewan,Department of Psychology
来源
Memory & Cognition | 2018年 / 46卷
关键词
Human; Reorientation; Feature; Geometry; Sex differences; Task instructions;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study examined whether differences in the amount of information provided to men and women, in the form of verbal instruction, influenced their encoding during a reorientation task. When a navigator needs to orient, featural (e.g., colour or texture) and geometry (e.g., metric information) are used to determine which direction to begin traveling. The current study used a spatial reorientation task to examine how men and women use featural and geometric cues and whether the content of the task’s instructions influenced how these cues were used. Participants were trained to find a target location in a rectangular room with distinctive objects situated at each corner. Once the participants were accurately locating the target, various tests manipulating the spatial information were conducted. We found both men and women encoded the featural cues, and even though the features provided reliable information, participants generally showed an encoding of geometry. However, when participants were not provided with any information about the spatial aspects of the task in the instructions, they failed to encode geometry. We also found that women used distant featural cues as landmarks when the featural cue closest to the target was removed, whereas men did not. Yet, when the two types of cues were placed in conflict, both sexes weighed featural cues more heavily than geometric cues. The content of the task instructions also influenced how cues were relied upon in this conflict situation. Our results have important implications for our understanding of how spatial cues are used for reorientation.
引用
收藏
页码:566 / 576
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Age and sex differences in a virtual version of the reorientation task
    Luciana Picucci
    Alessandro O. Caffò
    Andrea Bosco
    [J]. Cognitive Processing, 2009, 10 : 272 - 275
  • [12] Sex and sex-role differences in specific cognitive abilities
    Reilly, David
    Neumann, David L.
    Andrews, Glenda
    [J]. INTELLIGENCE, 2016, 54 : 147 - 158
  • [13] SEX-DIFFERENCES IN LATERALIZATION FOR SPATIAL ABILITIES
    KINGSBERG, SA
    LABARBA, RC
    BOWERS, CA
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE PSYCHONOMIC SOCIETY, 1987, 25 (04) : 247 - 250
  • [14] Sex differences in spatial abilities and spatial activity
    Nordvik, H
    Krekling, S
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 31 (3-4) : 24125 - 24125
  • [15] Individual and sex differences in learning abilities of ravens
    Range, F.
    Bugnyar, T.
    Schloegl, C.
    Kotrschal, K.
    [J]. BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES, 2006, 73 (01) : 100 - 106
  • [16] Age and Sex Differences in Verbal and Visuospatial Abilities
    Barel, Efrat
    Tzischinsky, Orna
    [J]. ADVANCES IN COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 14 (02) : 51 - 61
  • [17] Sexual selection and sex differences in mathematical abilities
    Geary, DC
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 1996, 19 (02) : 229 - &
  • [18] Sex differences in cortical neuroplasticity in humans
    Kuo, Min-Fang
    Paulus, Walter
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    [J]. NEUROREPORT, 2006, 17 (16) : 1703 - 1707
  • [19] SEX DIFFERENCES AND POSSIBLE SEX LINKAGE IN COGNITIVE ABILITIES - PRELIMINARY FINDINGS
    ZONDERMAN, AB
    SPUHLER, KP
    VANDENBERG, SG
    [J]. BEHAVIOR GENETICS, 1975, 5 (01) : 113 - 113
  • [20] SEX AND AGE-DIFFERENCES IN COGNITIVE-ABILITIES
    WILSON, JR
    [J]. BEHAVIOR GENETICS, 1976, 6 (01) : 120 - 121