Towards the conservation of crop wild relative diversity in North Africa: checklist, prioritisation and inventory

被引:0
|
作者
Sami Lala
Ahmed Amri
Nigel Maxted
机构
[1] University of Birmingham,School of Biosciences
[2] Genetic Resources Section in the International Centre for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA),undefined
来源
关键词
Agrobiodiversity; Checklist; Conservation; Crop wild relatives; Inventory; Prioritisation; North Africa;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Crop wild relatives (CWR) are wild species that are more or less genetically related to crops that can be used to introgress useful genes for improvement of productivity, resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses and quality of cultivated crops. They are important in crop improvement to achieve food security for an increasing population and to overcome the challenges caused by climate change and the new virulence of major diseases and pests. These genetic resources are increasingly threatened in their natural habitats through over-exploitation and land reclamation and degradation. Therefore, their efficient and effective conservation would be taxonomically and genetically valuable and will contribute to maintaining and promoting the sustainability of crop diversity, facilitating agricultural production and supporting the increasing demand for food, feed and natural resources. A checklist of 5780 Crop Wild Relatives (CWR) taxa from North Africa was obtained using the CWR Catalogue for Europe and the Mediterranean (PGR Forum). Of which consists 76% of the flora of North Africa. The checklist contains 5588 (~97%) native taxa and 192 introduced. Families with higher taxa richness are Fabaceae, Asteraceae, and Poaceae. These three families constitute more than 33% of the total taxa included in the checklist. About 9% (502) CWR taxa identified as a priority for conservation in North Africa using four criteria, the economic value of the crop, the relatedness degree of wild relatives to their crop, threat status using IUCN red list assessment, and finally the centre of origin and/or diversity of the crop. Of these, 112 taxa were assigned high, 268 medium and 122 low priorities for effective conservation. Those assessed as threatened using IUCN Red list and national assessment represent approximately 2% (119 taxa) of the CWR in the region. However, 21 taxa are assessed as critically endangered (CR), 53 as endangered (EN), and 45 as vulnerable (VU). Wild relatives of some globally important crops are present, with those related to wheat (Triticum aestivum L. and T. durum L.) and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) among the highest priority crops for the North Africa region. Amongst CWR assessed as threatened, only 8 (6.7%) CWR are related to food crops, Avena agadiriana B.R. Baum. et G. Fedak (VU), A. atlantica B.R. Baum et G. Fedak (VU), A. murphyi Ladiz. (EN), Beta macrocarpa Guss. (EN), Olea europaea subsp. maroccana Guss. (VU), Rorippa hayanica Maire (VU) and Aegilops bicornis (Forssk.) Jaub. et Spach (VU). The wild relative of Safflower Carthamus glaucus M. Bieb is restricted to Egypt and Libya and assessed as rare in Egypt. The information available about the conservation and threat status of CWR in North Africa still lags behind, and more investigations are required.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 124
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] In situ conservation of Helosciadium nodiflorum: a crop wild relative of celery in Germany
    Inga Mewis
    Nadine Bernhardt
    Maria Bönisch
    Jonathan Brassac
    Annette Naumann
    Matthias Zander
    Uta Schirmak
    Marion Nachtigall
    Christian Ulrichs
    [J]. Conservation Genetics, 2024, 25 (1) : 227 - 243
  • [32] Inventory and prioritization for the conservation of crop wild relatives in The Netherlands under climate change
    van Treuren, Rob
    Hoekstra, Roel
    van Hintum, Theo J. L.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2017, 216 : 123 - 139
  • [33] A prioritized crop wild relative inventory to help underpin global food security
    Vincent, Holly
    Wiersema, John
    Kell, Shelagh
    Fielder, Hannah
    Dobbie, Samantha
    Castaneda-Alvarez, Nora P.
    Guarino, Luigi
    Eastwood, Ruth
    Leon, Blanca
    Maxted, Nigel
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2013, 167 : 265 - 275
  • [34] Priority areas for the in situ conservation of crop wild relatives in South Africa
    Holness, Stephen
    Hamer, Michelle
    Brehm, Joana Magos
    Raimondo, Domitilla
    [J]. PLANT GENETIC RESOURCES-CHARACTERIZATION AND UTILIZATION, 2019, 17 (02): : 115 - 127
  • [35] Toward Integrated Conservation of North America's Crop Wild Relatives
    Khoury, Colin K.
    Greene, Stephanie L.
    Krishnan, Sarada
    Miller, Allison J.
    Moreau, Tara
    Williams, Karen A.
    Rodriguez-Bonilla, Lorraine
    Spurrier, Carol S.
    Zalapa, Juan
    Nabhan, Gary Paul
    [J]. NATURAL AREAS JOURNAL, 2020, 40 (01) : 96 - 100
  • [36] Agrobiodiversity Conservation: Securing the Diversity of Crop Wild Relatives and Landraces Preface
    [J]. AGROBIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION: SECURING THE DIVERSITY OF CROP WILD RELATIVES AND LANDRACES, 2012, : IX - X
  • [37] Review of congruence between global crop wild relative hotspots and centres of crop origin/diversity
    Maxted, Nigel
    Vincent, Holly
    [J]. GENETIC RESOURCES AND CROP EVOLUTION, 2021, 68 (04) : 1283 - 1297
  • [38] Review of congruence between global crop wild relative hotspots and centres of crop origin/diversity
    Nigel Maxted
    Holly Vincent
    [J]. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 2021, 68 : 1283 - 1297
  • [39] Modeling of crop wild relative species identifies areas globally for in situ conservation
    Holly Vincent
    Ahmed Amri
    Nora P. Castañeda-Álvarez
    Hannes Dempewolf
    Ehsan Dulloo
    Luigi Guarino
    David Hole
    Chikelu Mba
    Alvaro Toledo
    Nigel Maxted
    [J]. Communications Biology, 2
  • [40] Modeling of crop wild relative species identifies areas globally for in situ conservation
    Vincent, Holly
    Amri, Ahmed
    Castaneda-Alvarez, Nora P.
    Dempewolf, Hannes
    Dulloo, Ehsan
    Guarino, Luigi
    Hole, David
    Mba, Chikelu
    Toledo, Alvaro
    Maxted, Nigel
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS BIOLOGY, 2019, 2 (1)