Cost analysis of robotic assisted general surgery cases in a single academic institution

被引:0
|
作者
Eva Munshower
Emily Ren
Wayne B. Bauerle
Janice Ruland
Jill Stoltzfus
Marian McDonald
Daniel R. Baillie
Maher El Chaar
机构
[1] Temple/St. Luke’s School of Medicine,Department of Research and Innovation
[2] St. Luke’s University Health Network,Cost Accounting Department
[3] St. Luke’s University Health Network,Department of Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery
[4] St. Luke’s University Hospital and Health Network,Department of Surgery, Division of Bariatric Surgery
[5] St. Luke’s University Hospital and Health Network,undefined
来源
关键词
Cost; Robotic surgery; Cholecystectomy; Inguinal hernia repair; Paraesophageal hernia repair;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Laparoscopy is currently the standard approach for minimally invasive general surgery procedures. However, robotic surgery is now increasingly being used in general surgery. Robotic surgery provides several advantages such as 3D-visualization, articulated instruments, improved ergonomics, and increased dexterity, but is also associated with an increased overall cost which limits its widespread use. In our institution, the robotic assisted approach is frequently used for the performance of general surgery cases including inguinal hernias, cholecystectomies and paraesophageal hernia (PEH) repairs. The primary aim of the study was to evaluate the differences in cost between a robotic and laparoscopic approach for the above-mentioned cases. With IRB approval, we conducted a retrospective cost analysis of patients undergoing inguinal hernia repairs, cholecystectomies and PEH repairs between June 2018 and November 2020. Patients who had a concomitant procedure, a revisional surgery, or bilateral inguinal hernia repair were excluded from the study. Cost analysis was performed using a micro-costing approach. Statistical significance was denoted by p < 0.05. There were no differences among the different groups in relation to age, gender, ethnicity, and BMI. The overall cost of the robotic (R-) approach compared to a laparoscopic (L-) approach was significantly lower for cholecystectomy ($3,199.96 vs $4019.89, p < 0.05). For inguinal hernia repairs and PEH repairs without mesh, we found no significant difference in overall costs between the R- and L- approach (R- $3835.06 vs L- $3783.50, p = 0.69) and (R- $6852.41 vs L- $6819.69, p = 0.97), respectively. However, the overall cost of PEH with mesh was significantly higher for the R- group compared to the L- group (R- $7,511.09 vs L- $6,443.32, p < 0.05). Based on our institutional cost data, use of a robotic approach when performing certain general surgery cases does not seem to be cost prohibitive.
引用
收藏
页码:557 / 564
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Safety of Live Robotic Surgery: Results from a Single Institution
    Ogaya-Pinies, Gabriel
    Abdul-Muhsin, Haidar
    Palayapalayam-Ganapathi, Hariharan
    Bonet, Xavier
    Rogers, Travis
    Rocco, Bernardo
    Coelho, Rafael
    Hernandez-Cardona, Eduardo
    Jenson, Cathy
    Patel, Vipul
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2019, 5 (04): : 693 - 697
  • [32] Attitudes of Irish General Surgery trainees to Robotic-Assisted Surgery
    Ramjit, Sinead
    O'Connell, Lauren
    Donlon, Noel
    Neary, Paul
    O'Riordain, Diarmuid
    Hafeez, Adnan
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108 : 110 - 110
  • [33] The patterns and costs of the da Vinci robotic surgery system in a large academic institution
    Prewitt R.
    Bochkarev V.
    McBride C.L.
    Kinney S.
    Oleynikov D.
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2008, 2 (1) : 17 - 20
  • [34] Robotic rectal surgery: Outcomes of the first 102 totally robotic cases handled using the single-docking technique in a reference institution
    Denadai, Marcos V. A.
    Melani, Armando G. F.
    Neto, Maximiliano C.
    Romagnolo, Luis G. C.
    Diniz, Felipe D.
    Veo, Carlos A. R.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 123 (04) : 997 - 1004
  • [35] ROBOTIC ASSISTED BARIATRIC SURGERY: SINGLE ANASTOMOSIS DUODENAL SWITCH Robotic bariatric surgery
    Cripps, C.
    Taggart, J.
    Teixeira, J.
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2017, 27 : 1152 - 1152
  • [36] Robotic-Assisted Thoracic Surgery for Early Stage Lung Cancer: Ten Years' Single Institution Experience
    Galetta, D.
    Casiraghi, M.
    Spaggiari, L.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2019, 14 (10) : S1090 - S1090
  • [37] ROBOTIC LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SINGLE-SITE UROLOGICAL SURGERY: ANALYSIS OF 50 CASES
    Autorino, R.
    White, M. A.
    Haber, G. P.
    Laydner, H.
    Khanna, R.
    Hillyer, S.
    Altunrende, F.
    Spana, G.
    Yang, B.
    Fareed, K.
    Stein, R. J.
    Kaouk, J. J.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2011, 10 (02) : 110 - 110
  • [38] Robotic Versus Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Pulmonary Segmentectomy A Cost Analysis
    Musgrove, Kelsey A.
    Hayanga, Jeremiah A.
    Holmes, Sari D.
    Leung, Alexander
    Abbas, Ghulam
    INNOVATIONS-TECHNOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES IN CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 13 (05) : 338 - 343
  • [39] Robotic Laparoendoscopic Single Site Urological Surgery: Analysis of 50 Consecutive Cases
    White, Michael A.
    Autorino, Riccardo
    Spana, Gregory
    Hillyer, Shahab
    Stein, Robert J.
    Kaouk, Jihad H.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (05): : 1696 - 1701
  • [40] Bariatric Surgery in Ireland: A Review of 300 Cases From An Academic Institution
    Fearon, N.
    Kearns, E.
    Geoghegan, J.
    Heneghan, H.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 189 (SUPPL 5) : S115 - S115