Cost analysis of robotic assisted general surgery cases in a single academic institution

被引:0
|
作者
Eva Munshower
Emily Ren
Wayne B. Bauerle
Janice Ruland
Jill Stoltzfus
Marian McDonald
Daniel R. Baillie
Maher El Chaar
机构
[1] Temple/St. Luke’s School of Medicine,Department of Research and Innovation
[2] St. Luke’s University Health Network,Cost Accounting Department
[3] St. Luke’s University Health Network,Department of Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery
[4] St. Luke’s University Hospital and Health Network,Department of Surgery, Division of Bariatric Surgery
[5] St. Luke’s University Hospital and Health Network,undefined
来源
关键词
Cost; Robotic surgery; Cholecystectomy; Inguinal hernia repair; Paraesophageal hernia repair;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Laparoscopy is currently the standard approach for minimally invasive general surgery procedures. However, robotic surgery is now increasingly being used in general surgery. Robotic surgery provides several advantages such as 3D-visualization, articulated instruments, improved ergonomics, and increased dexterity, but is also associated with an increased overall cost which limits its widespread use. In our institution, the robotic assisted approach is frequently used for the performance of general surgery cases including inguinal hernias, cholecystectomies and paraesophageal hernia (PEH) repairs. The primary aim of the study was to evaluate the differences in cost between a robotic and laparoscopic approach for the above-mentioned cases. With IRB approval, we conducted a retrospective cost analysis of patients undergoing inguinal hernia repairs, cholecystectomies and PEH repairs between June 2018 and November 2020. Patients who had a concomitant procedure, a revisional surgery, or bilateral inguinal hernia repair were excluded from the study. Cost analysis was performed using a micro-costing approach. Statistical significance was denoted by p < 0.05. There were no differences among the different groups in relation to age, gender, ethnicity, and BMI. The overall cost of the robotic (R-) approach compared to a laparoscopic (L-) approach was significantly lower for cholecystectomy ($3,199.96 vs $4019.89, p < 0.05). For inguinal hernia repairs and PEH repairs without mesh, we found no significant difference in overall costs between the R- and L- approach (R- $3835.06 vs L- $3783.50, p = 0.69) and (R- $6852.41 vs L- $6819.69, p = 0.97), respectively. However, the overall cost of PEH with mesh was significantly higher for the R- group compared to the L- group (R- $7,511.09 vs L- $6,443.32, p < 0.05). Based on our institutional cost data, use of a robotic approach when performing certain general surgery cases does not seem to be cost prohibitive.
引用
收藏
页码:557 / 564
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [22] Cost Comparison of Laparoscopic and Robotic Colon Resections at a Hybrid Academic/Community Institution
    Johns, Michael S.
    Gough, Benjamin
    McCarthy, Elizabeth
    Vaid, Sachin
    Petrelli, Nicholas James
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2020, 231 (04) : E94 - E94
  • [23] Single-port video-assisted thoracic surgery in 1063 cases: a single-institution experience
    Xie, Dong
    Wang, Haifeng
    Fei, Ke
    Chen, Chang
    Zhao, Deping
    Zhou, Xiao
    Xie, Boxiong
    Jiang, Lei
    Chen, Qiankun
    Song, Nan
    Dai, Jie
    Jiang, Gening
    Zhu, Yuming
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2016, 49 : 31 - 36
  • [24] Patient outcomes and cost in robotic emergency general surgery
    Grimsley, Emily A.
    Janjua, Haroon M.
    Herron, Thomas
    Read, Meagan D.
    Lorch, Steven
    Cha, John Y.
    Farach, Sandra M.
    Douglas, Geoffrey P.
    Kuo, Paul C.
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2023, 17 (06) : 2937 - 2944
  • [25] Patient outcomes and cost in robotic emergency general surgery
    Emily A. Grimsley
    Haroon M. Janjua
    Thomas Herron
    Meagan D. Read
    Steven Lorch
    John Y. Cha
    Sandra M. Farach
    Geoffrey P. Douglas
    Paul C. Kuo
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2023, 17 : 2937 - 2944
  • [26] Robotic-assisted navigated minimally invasive pedicle screw placement in the first 100 cases at a single institution
    Huntsman, Kade T.
    Ahrendtsen, Leigh A.
    Riggleman, Jessica R.
    Ledonio, Charles G.
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2020, 14 (01) : 199 - 203
  • [27] Robotic-assisted navigated minimally invasive pedicle screw placement in the first 100 cases at a single institution
    Kade T. Huntsman
    Leigh A. Ahrendtsen
    Jessica R. Riggleman
    Charles G. Ledonio
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2020, 14 : 199 - 203
  • [28] Complications of Robotic Surgery in Pediatric Urology: A Single Institution Experience
    Bansal, Danesh
    Defoor, W. Robert, Jr.
    Reddy, Pramod P.
    Minevich, Eugene A.
    Noh, Paul H.
    UROLOGY, 2013, 82 (04) : 917 - 920
  • [29] COST ANALYSIS OF THE ROBOTIC SURGERY IN ITALY
    Turchetti, G.
    Pierotti, F.
    Palla, I
    Manetti, S.
    Cuschieri, A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (03) : A157 - A157
  • [30] A retrospective analysis of atypical fibroxanthoma treated with Mohs micrographic surgery at a single academic institution
    Matsumoto, Andrew
    Brown, Zoe
    Matsumoto, Martha
    Vandergriff, Travis
    Srivastava, Divya
    Nijhawan, Rajiv I.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2021, 84 (03) : 794 - 796