Cost analysis of robotic assisted general surgery cases in a single academic institution

被引:0
|
作者
Eva Munshower
Emily Ren
Wayne B. Bauerle
Janice Ruland
Jill Stoltzfus
Marian McDonald
Daniel R. Baillie
Maher El Chaar
机构
[1] Temple/St. Luke’s School of Medicine,Department of Research and Innovation
[2] St. Luke’s University Health Network,Cost Accounting Department
[3] St. Luke’s University Health Network,Department of Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery
[4] St. Luke’s University Hospital and Health Network,Department of Surgery, Division of Bariatric Surgery
[5] St. Luke’s University Hospital and Health Network,undefined
来源
关键词
Cost; Robotic surgery; Cholecystectomy; Inguinal hernia repair; Paraesophageal hernia repair;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Laparoscopy is currently the standard approach for minimally invasive general surgery procedures. However, robotic surgery is now increasingly being used in general surgery. Robotic surgery provides several advantages such as 3D-visualization, articulated instruments, improved ergonomics, and increased dexterity, but is also associated with an increased overall cost which limits its widespread use. In our institution, the robotic assisted approach is frequently used for the performance of general surgery cases including inguinal hernias, cholecystectomies and paraesophageal hernia (PEH) repairs. The primary aim of the study was to evaluate the differences in cost between a robotic and laparoscopic approach for the above-mentioned cases. With IRB approval, we conducted a retrospective cost analysis of patients undergoing inguinal hernia repairs, cholecystectomies and PEH repairs between June 2018 and November 2020. Patients who had a concomitant procedure, a revisional surgery, or bilateral inguinal hernia repair were excluded from the study. Cost analysis was performed using a micro-costing approach. Statistical significance was denoted by p < 0.05. There were no differences among the different groups in relation to age, gender, ethnicity, and BMI. The overall cost of the robotic (R-) approach compared to a laparoscopic (L-) approach was significantly lower for cholecystectomy ($3,199.96 vs $4019.89, p < 0.05). For inguinal hernia repairs and PEH repairs without mesh, we found no significant difference in overall costs between the R- and L- approach (R- $3835.06 vs L- $3783.50, p = 0.69) and (R- $6852.41 vs L- $6819.69, p = 0.97), respectively. However, the overall cost of PEH with mesh was significantly higher for the R- group compared to the L- group (R- $7,511.09 vs L- $6,443.32, p < 0.05). Based on our institutional cost data, use of a robotic approach when performing certain general surgery cases does not seem to be cost prohibitive.
引用
收藏
页码:557 / 564
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cost analysis of robotic assisted general surgery cases in a single academic institution
    Munshower, Eva
    Ren, Emily
    Bauerle, Wayne B.
    Ruland, Janice
    Stoltzfus, Jill
    McDonald, Marian
    Baillie, Daniel R.
    El Chaar, Maher
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2023, 17 (02) : 557 - 564
  • [2] Expense of Robotic Thyroidectomy A Cost Analysis at a Single Institution
    Broome, James T.
    Pomeroy, Sharon
    Solorzano, Carmen C.
    ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2012, 147 (12) : 1102 - 1106
  • [3] Perioperative Risk Assessment in Robotic General Surgery Lessons Learned From 884 Cases at a Single Institution
    Buchs, Nicolas C.
    Addeo, Pietro
    Bianco, Francesco M.
    Gorodner, Veronica
    Ayloo, Subhashini M.
    Elli, Enrique F.
    Oberholzer, Jose
    Benedetti, Enrico
    Giulianotti, Pier C.
    ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2012, 147 (08) : 701 - 708
  • [4] An Australian experience of robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: an analysis of over 2000 cases at a single institution
    Wetherell, D.
    Gyomber, D.
    Jack, G.
    Webb, D.
    Harewood, L.
    Lawrentschuk, N.
    Parker, F.
    Bolton, D.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 111 : 18 - 18
  • [5] Robotic-Assisted Pelvic Surgery: Early Outcomes in a Single Institution
    Scripcariu, Dragos Viorel
    Filip, Bogdan
    Hogea, Maximilian
    Vieriu, Razvan
    Spinu, Mihaela
    Gavrilescu, Mihaela-Madalina
    Florescu, Ioana
    Scripcariu, Viorel
    CHIRURGIA, 2023, 118 (01) : 39 - 47
  • [6] Robotic-assisted laparoscopic tubal anastomosis: Single institution analysis
    Ghomi, Ali
    Nolan, William
    Rodgers, Bruce
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2020, 16 (06): : 1 - 5
  • [7] Cost analysis of training residents in robotic-assisted surgery
    Chen, Xiaodong
    Meara, Michael
    Harzman, Alan
    Pieper, Heidi
    Ellison, E. Christopher
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 37 (04): : 2765 - 2769
  • [8] Cost analysis of training residents in robotic-assisted surgery
    Xiaodong Chen
    Michael Meara
    Alan Harzman
    Heidi Pieper
    E Christopher Ellison
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2023, 37 : 2765 - 2769
  • [9] Cost analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic general surgery procedures
    Rana M. Higgins
    Matthew J. Frelich
    Matthew E. Bosler
    Jon C. Gould
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2017, 31 : 185 - 192
  • [10] Cost analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic general surgery procedures
    Higgins, Rana M.
    Frelich, Matthew J.
    Bosler, Matthew E.
    Gould, Jon C.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 31 (01): : 185 - 192