Challenges for Corporate Ethics in Marketing Genetic Tests

被引:0
|
作者
Bryn Williams-Jones
Vural Ozdemir
机构
[1] Université de Montréal,Groupe de recherche en bioéthique, Département de médecine sociale et préventive, Faculté de médecine
[2] University of California Irvine,Biomarker and Clinical Pharmacology Unit, VA Long Beach Healthcare System, Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, College of Medicine
来源
关键词
biotechnology; genetic testing; disease susceptibility; pharmacogenomics; corporate ethics; business ethics; marketing; commercialization; intellectual property rights; truth in advertising;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Public discussions of ethical issues related to the biotechnology industry tend to treat “biotechnology” as a single, undifferentiated technology. Similarly, the pros and cons associated with this entire sector tend to get lumped together, such that individuals and groups often situate themselves as either “pro-” or “anti-” biotechnology as a whole. But different biotechnologies and their particular application context pose very different challenges for ethical corporate decision-making. Even within a single product category, different specialty products can pose strikingly different ethical challenges. In this paper, we focus on the single over-arching category of “genetic testing” and compare tests for disease susceptibility and drug response. We highlight the diversity of ethical challenges – grouped under the broad categories of “truth in advertising” and “protecting intellectual property” – raised by the commercialization and marketing of these technologies. By examining social and technical differences between genetic tests, and the associated corporate ethics challenges posed by their commercialization, our intent is to contribute to the nascent business ethics literature examining issues raised by the development and marketing of genetic tests.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 44
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] CORPORATE ETHICS
    KAUPE, AF
    [J]. FORTUNE, 1976, 94 (06) : 55 - 55
  • [32] CORPORATE ETHICS
    JANCAUSKAS, RC
    [J]. FORTUNE, 1977, 95 (01) : 45 - &
  • [33] European Journal of Marketing, Special Edition: ‘Corporate Identity and Corporate Marketing’
    Rosa Chun
    [J]. Corporate Reputation Review, 2001, 4 (3) : 276 - 283
  • [34] "Marketing Ethics" Embedded in the Marketing Course
    Ge, Zhiqiong
    [J]. 2013 ASIAN CONFERENCE ON THE SOCIAL SCIENCES (ACSS 2013), PT 2, 2013, 4 : 71 - 74
  • [35] Ethics and clinical utility of direct-to-consumer genetic tests
    Sarin, Rajiv
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2015, 11 (01) : 1 - 2
  • [36] Corporate citizenship: Challenging the corporate centricity in corporate marketing
    Andersen, Sophie Esmann
    Johansen, Trine Susanne
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2021, 131 : 686 - 699
  • [37] Social Responsibility and Business Ethics VII. Circular Economy and the Role of Corporate Social Marketing
    Popescu, Doina, I
    [J]. QUALITY-ACCESS TO SUCCESS, 2018, 19 (163): : 118 - 121
  • [38] MARKETING AND THE CORPORATE SPONSOR
    COX, J
    [J]. TRANSFUSION, 1984, 24 (05) : 447 - 447
  • [39] Dynamics and ethics of comprehensive preimplantation genetic testing: a review of the challenges
    Hens, Kristien
    Dondorp, Wybo
    Handyside, Alan H.
    Harper, Joyce
    Newson, Ainsley J.
    Pennings, Guido
    Rehmann-Sutter, Christoph
    de Wert, Guido
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2013, 19 (04) : 366 - 375
  • [40] ETHICS AND NEWBORN GENETIC SCREENING: New Technologies, New Challenges
    Peterson, James
    [J]. PERSPECTIVES ON SCIENCE AND CHRISTIAN FAITH, 2010, 62 (04): : 286 - 286